On 02/26/13 15:53, Vincent Torri wrote:
> hey
>
> while compiling libvmime 0.9.1 with gcc 4.7.2 (targetting 64 bits), i
> had that error
>
> libtool: compile: x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
> -I/opt/efl64/include -I.. -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1
> -IC:/MinGW/msys/1.0/opt/gst/0
hey
while compiling libvmime 0.9.1 with gcc 4.7.2 (targetting 64 bits), i
had that error
libtool: compile: x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
-I/opt/efl64/include -I.. -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1
-IC:/MinGW/msys/1.0/opt/gst/0.10/x86_64/include
-Ic:/gstreamer-sdk/0.10/x86_64/incl
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai Tietz [mailto:ktiet...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:00 AM
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] SJLJ vs DW2 - fact checking
>
> Hello Kai,
>
> 2013/2/26 Koehne Kai :
> > Hi there,
> >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Ruben Van Boxem [mailto:vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:01 AM
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] SJLJ vs DW2 - fact checking
>
> 2013/2/26 Koehne Kai
>
>
> Hi there,
>
>
Hello Kai,
2013/2/26 Koehne Kai :
> Hi there,
>
> For Qt 5.0 we've been packaging a 32bit mingw-builds toolchain with SJLJ
> exception handling. However, it now became clear that the performance penalty
> for SJLJ is quite heavy (e.g. 25% for startup of a medium-sized application,
> up to 3x sl
2013/2/26 Koehne Kai
> Hi there,
>
> For Qt 5.0 we've been packaging a 32bit mingw-builds toolchain with SJLJ
> exception handling. However, it now became clear that the performance
> penalty for SJLJ is quite heavy (e.g. 25% for startup of a medium-sized
> application, up to 3x slow down for a s
Hi there,
For Qt 5.0 we've been packaging a 32bit mingw-builds toolchain with SJLJ
exception handling. However, it now became clear that the performance penalty
for SJLJ is quite heavy (e.g. 25% for startup of a medium-sized application, up
to 3x slow down for a small test application, see also
