On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Alexpux wrote:
>
>> 22 янв. 2015 г., в 12:50, Jacek Caban написал(а):
>>
>> On 01/22/15 06:05, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>>> Passed full gcc 4.9 32 bit and 64 bit building, then pushed.
>>
>> Did anyone review the patch before you pushed? You shouldn't mark is as
>>
On 22.01.2015 12:10, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2015-01-22 6:35 GMT+01:00 Dongsheng Song wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, LRN wrote:
And, of course, i've just stepped on the same rake... Here's a patch that
*actually* fixes this
> 22 янв. 2015 г., в 12:50, Jacek Caban написал(а):
>
> On 01/22/15 06:05, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>> Passed full gcc 4.9 32 bit and 64 bit building, then pushed.
>
> Did anyone review the patch before you pushed? You shouldn't mark is as
> DATA until it has emulation code.
Agree with it.
Rega
On 01/22/15 06:05, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Passed full gcc 4.9 32 bit and 64 bit building, then pushed.
Did anyone review the patch before you pushed? You shouldn't mark is as
DATA until it has emulation code.
Jacek
--
Yes, looks ok to me too. So please go ahead and apply.
Thanks,
Kai
2015-01-22 6:35 GMT+01:00 Dongsheng Song :
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Dongsheng Song
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, LRN wrote:
>>> And, of course, i've just stepped on the same rake... Here's a patch that
