在 2018/11/24 13:30, Edward Diener 写道:
> ==> Starting prepare()...
> patch: invalid argument 'E:\\Programming\\VersionControl' for
> '$VERSION_CONTROL'
> Valid arguments are:
> - 'none', 'off'
> - 'simple', 'never'
> - 'existing', 'nil'
> - 'numbered', 't'
> ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in
sounds like VERSION_CONTROL is interfering to me. Isnt that a subversion
macro ?, might explain why pacman goes nuts.
Den 24-11-2018 kl. 06:30 skrev Edward Diener:
On 11/23/2018 10:04 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2018/11/24 上午9:31, Edward Diener 写道:
On 11/23/2018 5:06 PM, Greg Jung wrote:
You
On 11/23/2018 10:04 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2018/11/24 上午9:31, Edward Diener 写道:
On 11/23/2018 5:06 PM, Greg Jung wrote:
You should try "makepkg -g" and paste/copy the results, for the lines
that
are different, into the PKGBUILD.
Then, makepkg --check can be used to test it.
When I run makepkg
在 2018/11/24 上午9:31, Edward Diener 写道:
> On 11/23/2018 5:06 PM, Greg Jung wrote:
>> You should try "makepkg -g" and paste/copy the results, for the lines
>> that
>> are different, into the PKGBUILD.
>> Then, makepkg --check can be used to test it.
>
> When I run makepkg -g I get:
>
> ==> ERROR:
On 11/23/2018 5:49 PM, Earnie via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
On 11/23/2018 3:12 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
On 11/23/2018 9:06 AM, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2018/11/23 21:55, Edward Diener 写道:
On 11/22/2018 9:07 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
binutils-2.30.tar.bz2
On 11/23/2018 5:06 PM, Greg Jung wrote:
You should try "makepkg -g" and paste/copy the results, for the lines that
are different, into the PKGBUILD.
Then, makepkg --check can be used to test it.
When I run makepkg -g I get:
==> ERROR: pkgname is not allowed to start with a hyphen.
==> ERROR:
On 11/23/2018 3:12 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
On 11/23/2018 9:06 AM, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2018/11/23 21:55, Edward Diener 写道:
On 11/22/2018 9:07 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
binutils-2.30.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key
13FCEF89DD9E3C4F)
==>
You should try "makepkg -g" and paste/copy the results, for the lines that
are different, into the PKGBUILD.
Then, makepkg --check can be used to test it.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:51 AM Edward Diener <
eldlistmaili...@tropicsoft.com> wrote:
> On 11/23/2018 9:06 AM, Liu Hao wrote:
> > 在
W dniu 22.11.2018 o 09:51, Mateusz pisze:
> W dniu 21.11.2018 o 23:39, Martin Storsjö pisze:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Mateusz wrote:
>>
>>> Problem is in libstdc++.a which uses fseeko64 from libmingwex.
>>>
>>> My proposition is:
>>> we could build two libmingwex -- libmingwex for msvcrt and
W dniu 23.11.2018 o 00:50, Edward Diener pisze:
> There is a bug which in binutils which causes clang targeting mingw-64/gcc on
> Windows to create a bad windows executable. The bug is explained at
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23872 and is fixed at
>
On 11/23/2018 9:06 AM, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2018/11/23 21:55, Edward Diener 写道:
On 11/22/2018 9:07 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
binutils-2.30.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key 13FCEF89DD9E3C4F)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be
So much confusion for something so simple ...
On 11/22/2018 10:30 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2018/11/23 上午10:37, Edward Diener 写道
I do not believe I am trying to upgrade an MSYS2 package. Rather I am
trying to fix a mingw-64/gcc-8.1 installation in Windows itself so that
the binutils part of the
在 2018/11/23 21:55, Edward Diener 写道:
> On 11/22/2018 9:07 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
> ==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
> binutils-2.30.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key 13FCEF89DD9E3C4F)
> ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
>
> Do you have any idea of
On 11/22/2018 9:07 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2018/11/23 上午7:50, Edward Diener 写道:
There is a bug which in binutils which causes clang targeting
mingw-64/gcc on Windows to create a bad windows executable. The bug is
explained at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23872 and
is fixed at
On 11/22/2018 10:25 PM, Greg Jung wrote:
The recipe from Liu Hao is correct for what it describes and now the
nomenclature
needs to be discussed so that you can explain what you need. You have
called something
"mingw-64" which is none of the options.
When I wrote mingw-64 I meant mingw-w64.
15 matches
Mail list logo