> This is suboptimal, but a better solution is unclear and I think that we
> should deal with the regression without waiting.
In my humble opinion, I would suggest removing/editing **only** the
problematic declarations in the C language instead of the whole file,
like Liu Hao did with the
Hi,
I sent this as a patch earlier, but it got stuck on moderation due to
the size. Please review commit:
https://github.com/cjacek/mingw-w64/commit/c073fb0c62a785cc5524e660568e85a89de2c0d5
This is suboptimal, but a better solution is unclear and I think that we
should deal with the
Yes, this is MSYS2's mingw-w64-gcc/binutils issue. You can find
related issues here[1]. If you didn't find any issue with your exact
problem you can create a new issue there[2]. Or join MSYS2 Gitter
channel just for normal discussion[3].
[1]:
hello
i've updated mingw-w64 with pacman in MSYS2 and i have this warning
each time gcc is called :
C:/Documents/msys2/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/10.2.0/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld.exe:
warning: --export-dynamic is not supported for PE+ targets, did you
mean
