On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, LIU Hao wrote:
在 2023-02-13 06:13, Martin Storsjö 写道:
When a subset of ssp functions were implemented in
7478c20848f60e6238547db63d1a5bc450d468cc, only functions that were
referenced with _FORTIFY_SOURCE were added. This set of functions
accidentally missed __gets_chk,
LIU Hao wrote:
Side note: I am a bit curious how this function is supposed to be
useful. Generally speaking `get()` should never be used.
__gets_chk() may (only) be useful to fortify very old code.
From the C/C++ standards point of view, the gets() prototype should be
disabled if C11 or
在 2023-02-13 06:13, Martin Storsjö 写道:
When a subset of ssp functions were implemented in
7478c20848f60e6238547db63d1a5bc450d468cc, only functions that were
referenced with _FORTIFY_SOURCE were added. This set of functions
accidentally missed __gets_chk, which we do reference if fortification
is
When a subset of ssp functions were implemented in
7478c20848f60e6238547db63d1a5bc450d468cc, only functions that were
referenced with _FORTIFY_SOURCE were added. This set of functions
accidentally missed __gets_chk, which we do reference if fortification
is enabled.
Thus, this fixes an accidental
