On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Mook
mookgcc+sf.mingw-w64-pub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:22 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
For some reason yet unknown to me, the gcc-provided headers
have
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/3/23 NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Mook
mookgcc+sf.mingw-w64-pub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21,
2010/3/23 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/3/23 NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Mook
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/3/23 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/3/23 NightStrike
2010/3/23 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/3/23 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Kai Tietz
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/3/23 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/3/23 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, NightStrike
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't understand, how can a fixinclude fix this thing??
As I understand it, our headers are already being fixincluded. It's
fixincludes that causes GCC to override us. That means that there's
stuff in our headers that GCC
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't understand, how can a fixinclude fix this thing??
As I understand it,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:51 AM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Doug Semler dougsem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:22:48 NightStrike wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
For some reason yet unknown
2010/3/22 Doug Semler dougsem...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:51 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Doug Semler dougsem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:22:48 NightStrike wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Ozkan Sezer
Thanks Ozkan, that did the trick... the linear algebra libs now compile and
work as expected...
thanks,
-dave
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Dave Camarillo
dave.camari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm having a little
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:22 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
For some reason yet unknown to me, the gcc-provided headers
have priority over the system provided headers and float.h is
especially problematic: Not
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Dave Camarillo
dave.camari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm having a little trouble with the include paths used by mingw-w64
and was hoping for some insight... I have this chunk of code compiling
correctly under the normal mingw system, but have some problems
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
For some reason yet unknown to me, the gcc-provided headers
have priority over the system provided headers and float.h is
especially problematic: Not installing or deleting it is the solution,
at least for now.
If gcc
14 matches
Mail list logo
