On 25/12/2013 7:31 AM, niXman wrote:
> Ivan Garramona 2013-12-25 00:19:
>> I'm even planning to move my projects from the buggy VC++ 2013
>> to Clang.
> Why Clang? Why not GCC/MinGW-W64?
>
> As far as I know, Clang optimizes much worse than GCC. Small plus Clang
> in that it compiles a little bit f
Hello Kai,
Kai Tietz writes:
> Sounds interesting. But honestly, llvm (Clang) is for Windows right
> now pretty unusable. Major basic features of compiler are missing.
LLVM is one thing and Clang another. LLVM works fine on Windows. Lacks
some features compared to *nix, but it is useful since
Regards,
>>
>> Jose
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Ruben Van Boxem
>> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:18:03
>> To:
>> mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Reply-To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-p
Ruben Van Boxem 2013-12-27 16:54:
> I was busy setting up some new build scripts, and hoped to
> get a new Clang build out with a newer GCC's libstdc++, but haven't
> finished that little project yet. Wish me luck on that :-)
Why yet another build scripts? Our scripts can build CLang.
Maybe with o
oxem
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:18:03
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net<
> mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Reply-To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] clang on Windows
>
>
> -
t's use both gcc and clang. It's about choice. The more tools, the better.
Regards,
Jose
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Van Boxem
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:18:03
To:
mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Reply-To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ming
2013/12/27 niXman
> Óscar Fuentes 2013-12-25 00:51:
> > In my projects, programs compiled with Clang (since 3.2) run about 5%
> > faster than with g++ (4.8.1). That's on Linux x86_64.
> My tests indicate the opposite.
>
> > Diagnostics are much better than any other C++ compiler,
> What are you t
Óscar Fuentes 2013-12-25 00:51:
> In my projects, programs compiled with Clang (since 3.2) run about 5%
> faster than with g++ (4.8.1). That's on Linux x86_64.
My tests indicate the opposite.
> Diagnostics are much better than any other C++ compiler,
What are you talking?
> Standards compliance i
Ivan Garramona
writes:
> Clang+MinGW-w64 is working pretty well for me.
For me the inability of creating C++ DLLs (exporting classes and
template instantiations) is a show stopper. I had problems with some
Boost libraries (boost::thread, IIRC) but that could be fixable.
I'm glad that it works f
niXman writes:
> Ivan Garramona 2013-12-25 00:19:
>> I'm even planning to move my projects from the buggy VC++ 2013
>> to Clang.
> Why Clang? Why not GCC/MinGW-W64?
>
> As far as I know, Clang optimizes much worse than GCC.
In my projects, programs compiled with Clang (since 3.2) run about 5%
fa
Alexpux writes:
> This topic about removing dependency from GCC libs - libstdc++ and libgcc as
> I understand.
Why shall users interested on Clang worry about replacing libstdc++ and
libgcc when there are core features missing, such as C++ DLLs?
> There are two projects that can replace them:
Ivan Garramona 2013-12-25 00:19:
> I'm even planning to move my projects from the buggy VC++ 2013
> to Clang.
Why Clang? Why not GCC/MinGW-W64?
As far as I know, Clang optimizes much worse than GCC. Small plus Clang
in that it compiles a little bit faster than GCC.
I really do not understand the
2013/12/24 Óscar Fuentes
> Ivan Garramona
> writes:
>
> > I think Clang svn uses its integrated assembler.
>
> IIRC Clang uses the integrated assembler since a few releases ago.
>
> > But it still needs GCC for linking though.
>
> On Windows, Clang needs MinGW or VS for linking and for the runti
25 дек. 2013 г., в 0:08, Óscar Fuentes написал(а):
> Alexpux writes:
>
>> My 50 cents to this topic. There are some interesting discussion about
>> porting clang to self-hosting on windows
>> http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Porting-libcxxabi-Unwind-to-Windows-MingW-32-bit-td403539
Alexpux writes:
> My 50 cents to this topic. There are some interesting discussion about
> porting clang to self-hosting on windows
> http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Porting-libcxxabi-Unwind-to-Windows-MingW-32-bit-td4035390.html
AFAIK Clang could use (actually uses?) GCC exception
24 дек. 2013 г., в 23:13, Óscar Fuentes написал(а):
> Ivan Garramona
> writes:
>
>> I think Clang svn uses its integrated assembler.
>
> IIRC Clang uses the integrated assembler since a few releases ago.
>
>> But it still needs GCC for linking though.
>
> On Windows, Clang needs MinGW or VS
Ivan Garramona
writes:
> I think Clang svn uses its integrated assembler.
IIRC Clang uses the integrated assembler since a few releases ago.
> But it still needs GCC for linking though.
On Windows, Clang needs MinGW or VS for linking and for the runtime
libraries and headers (SDK, standard C/C
I think Clang svn uses its integrated assembler. But it still needs GCC for
linking though.
2013/12/24 Óscar Fuentes
> Baruch Burstein
> writes:
>
> > And if I compile it with MinGW then it uses MinGW's toolchain, no?
>
> Correct.
>
> > Does Clang not have it's own toolchain (specifically link
Baruch Burstein
writes:
> And if I compile it with MinGW then it uses MinGW's toolchain, no?
Correct.
> Does Clang not have it's own toolchain (specifically linker)?
They are creating one ( http://lld.llvm.org ) but it is not
production-ready yet.
llvm-link is for manipulating LLVM IR files.
And if I compile it with MinGW then it uses MinGW's toolchain, no? Does
Clang not have it's own toolchain (specifically linker)?
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Ivan Garramona
wrote:
> You have to compile Clang with MinGW, otherwise Clang will use VS's
> toolchain.
>
>
> 2013/12/23 Baruch Burst
You have to compile Clang with MinGW, otherwise Clang will use VS's
toolchain.
2013/12/23 Baruch Burstein
> I apologize if this is not the right place for this. If so, letme know and
> I will not post more questions about clang to here.
>
> This question is really targeted towards Ruben and oth
I apologize if this is not the right place for this. If so, letme know and
I will not post more questions about clang to here.
This question is really targeted towards Ruben and others on this list who
have built clang toolchains for Windows. I just tried building clang myself
(nothing fancy, just
22 matches
Mail list logo
