Frankly, I didn't like it, either. But there doesn't seem to be a good
way to dynamically determine the Windows version. And a compile time
option would need to default to the least common denominator of not
having the high res timer available. But there's really no point in
using this code
Frankly, I didn't like it, either. But there doesn't seem to be a good
way to dynamically determine the Windows version. And a compile time
option would need to default to the least common denominator of not
having the high res timer available. But there's really no point in
using this code
I'm open to suggestions on how to determine the Windows version. Only
newer versions support the high res timer.
On 1/2/2022 3:50 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
Glenn Burkhardt
writes:
Reading the registry on every call to clock_nanosleep is wasteful.
Glenn Burkhardt
writes:
Reading the registry on every call to clock_nanosleep is wasteful.
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Hi. Here's a patch that uses high res timers for clock_nanosleep.
*** clock.c.origSun Jan 2 13:40:55 2022
--- clock.c Sun Jan 2 14:09:09 2022
***
*** 6,11
--- 6,12
#include
#include
+ #include
#include
#include
#ifndef IN_WINPTHREAD
**
