If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
Is it correct ?
PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
use _POSIX_ anymore.
MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid with !__STDC__.
--
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
> Is it correct ?
>
> PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
> use _POSIX_ anymore.
> MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid with !__STDC__.
I believe (but not necessarily correct ab
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
> > Is it correct ?
> >
> > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
> > use _POSIX_ anymore.
> > MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid wit
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
>
>> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>> > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
>> > Is it correct ?
>> >
>> > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
>> > use _POSIX_
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
>>
>>> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>>> > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
>>> > Is it correct ?
>>> >
>>> > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last
On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
>>>
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
> Is it correc
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > If we define _POS
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
>
>> On 11/7/14, Dongs
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> 2014-11-07