> One of the problems with doing a Mirage release is the sheer number of
> often-interdependent packages that need releasing at once, and the
> lack of a way to do so atomically. The inevitable breakage seems to
> cause considerable pain if you're unlucky enough to be doing something
> else at the
> Try running
>
> xe sr-list
>
This is what I got:
sudo xe sr-list
uuid ( RO): a0ceb329-83cb-d074-50d9-53846aa40ff7
name-label ( RW): XenServer Tools
name-description ( RW): XenServer Tools ISOs
host ( RO): cubieboard2
type ( RO): i
> On 4 Jun 2015, at 18:00, Nick Betteridge wrote:
>
> Excellent, they both compile, but I'm getting an error with the upload:
>
> ./dns.xe
> Uploading VDI containing unikernel
> result = [ version="1.0"?>StatusSuccessValueOpaqueRef:da16d417-e6d1-c55f-1957-5f2e169d44ff]
> result = [ version="1.0
Excellent, they both compile, but I'm getting an error with the upload:
./dns.xe
Uploading VDI containing unikernel
result = [StatusSuccessValueOpaqueRef:da16d417-e6d1-c55f-1957-5f2e169d44ff]
result = [StatusSuccessValueOpaqueRef:02d446ef-7760-6096-09cd-909e82b9d706]
result = [StatusSuccessValueOp
> On 4 Jun 2015, at 17:16, Nick Betteridge wrote:
>
>
> > Try
> >
> > opam pin add mbr-format git://github.com/djs55/ocaml-mbr#release.0.3
> > opam pin add xe-unikernel-upload
> > git://github.com/djs55/xe-unikernel-upload#new-mirage-interfaces
> >
> > I have built these but not tested them.
> Try
>
> opam pin add mbr-format git://github.com/djs55/ocaml-mbr#release.0.3
> opam pin add xe-unikernel-upload
> git://github.com/djs55/xe-unikernel-upload#new-mirage-interfaces
>
> I have built these but not tested them. Let me know if they work for you and
> I’ll try to release them into
> On 4 Jun 2015, at 09:49, Nick Betteridge wrote:
>
> Beaten to it by Dave.
>
> While we're taking about api on cubie, trying to install xe-unikernel-upload
> wants me to downgrade an awful lot of packages. I really don't want to
> downgrade from mirage 2.5 to 2.1 - whats the best way of tack
>
> I think the main source of trouble is that some repositories are not
> packaged and thus it is not obvious which are their dependencies:
> - - mirage-skeleton/mirage-www: should it work with
> mirage-as-released-in-opam? or the development repo mirage-dev? or
> master from various packages?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Hi,
On 06/04/2015 08:49, Thomas Gazagnaire wrote:
> Libraries in mirage-dev are in flux and people using it should
> expect breakage -- reporting these breakages on the list or on
> GitHub is *very* useful to converge to a stable state. Once
> stabi
Le jeudi, 4 juin 2015 à 11:34, Richard Mortier a écrit :
> I think what I'm really saying is: a lightweight way to request a
> consistent set of packages without needing to setup a dev opam repo.
I think this is tracked by https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/1734
Daniel
__
On 4 June 2015 at 08:49, Thomas Gazagnaire wrote:
>> A thought occurred that one way for users to deal with this relatively
>> straightforwardly might be to add the ability for opam to pin packages
>> based on a datetime. We might then announce that a release was
>> in-progress, and anyone who car
Beaten to it by Dave.
While we're taking about api on cubie, trying to install xe-unikernel-upload
wants me to downgrade an awful lot of packages. I really don't want to
downgrade from mirage 2.5 to 2.1 - whats the best way of tackling this?
Cheers
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:40:20 +0100
Subject:
Thanks for the input, I normally set up the board with a static ip address so
that I can find it easily - I'll ask on the xapi list.
___
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@lists.xenproject.org
http://list
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> On 4 June 2015 at 09:22, Nick Betteridge
> wrote:
> > Each time I fire up a '2 and leave it on overnight and then try and ssh
> into
> > the board the following morning, I get a no route to host. Doing an arp
> on
> > my machine will list t
On 4 June 2015 at 09:22, Nick Betteridge wrote:
> Each time I fire up a '2 and leave it on overnight and then try and ssh into
> the board the following morning, I get a no route to host. Doing an arp on
> my machine will list the ip address but default to a 0:0:0:0:0:0 mac
> address. Incidentally
Each time I fire up a '2 and leave it on overnight and then try and ssh into
the board the following morning, I get a no route to host. Doing an arp on my
machine will list the ip address but default to a 0:0:0:0:0:0 mac address.
Incidentally, all of the running unikernels on the board are still
> A thought occurred that one way for users to deal with this relatively
> straightforwardly might be to add the ability for opam to pin packages
> based on a datetime. We might then announce that a release was
> in-progress, and anyone who cared could pin all packages to some
> "safe" time before
17 matches
Mail list logo
