Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Nick Betteridge
On 14/07/16 18:10, Daniel Bünzli wrote: > Le jeudi, 14 juillet 2016 à 17:53, Nick Betteridge a écrit : >> My Atmel Zigbit modem is currently strapped to my cubieboard - when I >> destroy the unikernel, the radio carries on singing. Is that what >> you're asking, or are you talking about modem man

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Daniel Bünzli
Le jeudi, 14 juillet 2016 à 18:10, Daniel Bünzli a écrit : > Since you have to deal with that idea anyway I'd say it's better not to > support a restart event. It could however be added as a *hint* to the stop event payload. Daniel ___ MirageOS-de

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Daniel Bünzli
Le jeudi, 14 juillet 2016 à 17:53, Nick Betteridge a écrit : > My Atmel Zigbit modem is currently strapped to my cubieboard - when I > destroy the unikernel, the radio carries on singing. Is that what > you're asking, or are you talking about modem management in general? > > Incidentally, another

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Nick Betteridge
On 14/07/16 17:35, Nik Sultana wrote: > I wonder if there's a mature interface for life-cycling lightweight > processes in the Erlang ecosystem, perhaps covering the variety of > phases you described originally. (I'm thinking of Erlang and lightweight > processes since the lifecycle phases in the

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Nick Betteridge
On 14/07/16 17:35, Nik Sultana wrote: > I wonder if there's a mature interface for life-cycling lightweight > processes in the Erlang ecosystem, perhaps covering the variety of > phases you described originally. (I'm thinking of Erlang and lightweight > processes since the lifecycle phases in the i

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Nik Sultana
I wonder if there's a mature interface for life-cycling lightweight processes in the Erlang ecosystem, perhaps covering the variety of phases you described originally. (I'm thinking of Erlang and lightweight processes since the lifecycle phases in the interface developed for such processes migh

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 14 July 2016 at 17:22, Nick Betteridge wrote: > >> >>> The basic calls would be Start, Stop, Pause, Resume. Restart? > >> I suspect restart may be difficult to distinguish in certain >> contexts, this would make it an unreliable event. Do you have any >> particular use c

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Nick Betteridge
> >> The basic calls would be Start, Stop, Pause, Resume. Restart? > I suspect restart may be difficult to distinguish in certain > contexts, this would make it an unreliable event. Do you have any > particular use cas for something you'd like to do knowing that you >

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Richard Mortier
On 14 July 2016 at 16:22, Nick Betteridge wrote: > > The basic calls would be Start, Stop, Pause, Resume. Restart? >>> I suspect restart may be difficult to distinguish in certain contexts, this would make it an unreliable event. Do you have any particular use cas for somet

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Nick Betteridge
>>> The basic calls would be Start, Stop, Pause, Resume. Restart? >> >>> I suspect restart may be difficult to distinguish in certain >>> contexts, this would make it an unreliable event. Do you have any >>> particular use cas for something you'd like to do knowing that you >>> are going to r

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Nik Sultana
On 2016-07-14 14:19, Richard Mortier wrote: On 14 July 2016 at 14:11, Daniel Bünzli wrote: Le jeudi, 14 juillet 2016 à 13:06, Nick Betteridge a écrit : The basic calls would be Start, Stop, Pause, Resume. Restart? I suspect restart may be difficult to distinguish in certain contexts, this

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Richard Mortier
On 14 July 2016 at 14:11, Daniel Bünzli wrote: > Le jeudi, 14 juillet 2016 à 13:06, Nick Betteridge a écrit : > >> The basic calls would be Start, Stop, Pause, Resume. Restart? > I suspect restart may be difficult to distinguish in certain contexts, this > would make it an unreliable event. Do y

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Daniel Bünzli
Le jeudi, 14 juillet 2016 à 13:06, Nick Betteridge a écrit : > Big thanks, of course, to Gemma for organising the event. Yes ! > The basic calls would be Start, Stop, Pause, Resume. Restart? I suspect restart may be difficult to distinguish in certain contexts, this would make it an unreliable

[MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

2016-07-14 Thread Nick Betteridge
Firstly, just let me say that I had a great time yesterday at the Hackathon - finally managed to meet all of the people involved and working on/with Mirage - and very grateful for all of the suggestions (Solo5/Alpine etc). Big thanks, of course, to Gemma for organising the event. I'd li