Hi folks,
These changes have been merged! Thanks for all of you who helped out,
particularly Drup and Hannes who provided a lot of helpful code review
and feedback. Also, many thanks to haesbaert, as charrua-core was a
dream to work with -- charrua-client is very small, and over half of it
i
On 3 Nov 2016, at 16:47, Richard Mortier wrote:
>
> All;
>
> Following the demise of the Cubieboard2 and Cubietruck images hosted at
> blobs.openmirage.org, and Ian Campbell's sterling work to get Alpine images
> started at the hackathon, I've finally taken some time to try and
> reinvigorate
All;
Following the demise of the Cubieboard2 and Cubietruck images hosted at
blobs.openmirage.org, and Ian Campbell's sterling work to get Alpine images
started at the hackathon, I've finally taken some time to try and
reinvigorate `mirage/xen-arm-builder`.
Travis finally went green, so I've just
> On 3 Nov 2016, at 13:01, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday 3 November 2016 at 13:19, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>
>> I'm porting cstruct opam packages to topkg, and need to make a backwards
>> incompatible change to the ocamlfind layout. It is currently:
>>
>> cstruct
>> cstruct.lwt
On 3 Nov 2016, at 12:57, Hannes Mehnert wrote:
>
> On 03/11/2016 12:19, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> I'm porting cstruct opam packages to topkg, and need to make a backwards
>> incompatible change to the ocamlfind layout. It is currently:
>>
>> cstruct
>> cstruct.lwt
>> cstruct.ppx
>> cstruct.u
On Thursday 3 November 2016 at 13:19, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> I'm porting cstruct opam packages to topkg, and need to make a backwards
> incompatible change to the ocamlfind layout. It is currently:
>
> cstruct
> cstruct.lwt
> cstruct.ppx
> cstruct.unix
>
> I propose to change these ocamlf
On 03/11/2016 12:19, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> I'm porting cstruct opam packages to topkg, and need to make a backwards
> incompatible change to the ocamlfind layout. It is currently:
>
> cstruct
> cstruct.lwt
> cstruct.ppx
> cstruct.unix
>
> I propose to change these ocamlfind packages to
>
I'm porting cstruct opam packages to topkg, and need to make a backwards
incompatible change to the ocamlfind layout. It is currently:
cstruct
cstruct.lwt
cstruct.ppx
cstruct.unix
I propose to change these ocamlfind packages to
cstruct
cstruct-lwt
cstruct-ppx
cstruct-unix
so that they are th
If you are planning on attending, we'd appreciate the Doodle being filled in
this week so that we can sort out catering in good time.
http://doodle.com/poll/fsy7gue9xvbvvdm8
Feel free to fill it in if you're not sure yet of your attendance. Excess food
will be given to Jimmy's Night Shelter so i
On 3 Nov 2016, at 09:37, Federico Gimenez wrote:
>
> Hello everyone, I've started porting ocaml-crunch to topkg, have this so far
> [1].
That's looking simpler!
> I have a problem with the tests, not sure what's the best approach to port
> them given that now they are based on make and are te
Hello everyone, I've started porting ocaml-crunch to topkg, have this so
far [1].
I have a problem with the tests, not sure what's the best approach to port
them given that now they are based on make and are testing the binary
product of the build process. Moreover, when i try to execute them with
11 matches
Mail list logo
