Hello MirageOS!
I’m working on a simple application that accepts a form post, parses the input,
and then adds the info into a list of records. Once I have this list of
records, I’m planning on writing it out to a file using the FS interface,
here’s the function I’ve written:
module Main .
Hi Dan,
I’m building some software that aims to make it easy to run unikernels on the
major cloud platforms. For MirageOS, Solo5 seems to be a super simple way to
make that happen - on GCE anyway. A few quick commands and you’re good to go.
It would be great to be able to do the same on Xen ba
Andrew Stuart wrote on 11/17/2016
02:52:27 PM:
> I’m curious to understand - if solo5 had Xen PV on HVM drivers
> https://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Linux_PV_on_HVM_drivers, would it work
> on Xen/EC2/HVM? Is the only obstacle to it working that Solo5
> doesn’t have the Xen virtual network and disk
>> That's correct, Xen HVM uses the Xen split device driver model, not virtio,
>> so Solo5 does not contain drivers for them.
I’m curious to understand - if solo5 had Xen PV on HVM drivers
https://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Linux_PV_on_HVM_drivers, would it work on
Xen/EC2/HVM? Is the only obstacle
On 17/11/2016 17:06, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2016, at 15:55, Mindy wrote:
>>
>> On 11/17/2016 09:47 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the update Thomas; I've converted your notes below into a
>>> mirage.io blog post so it's easier to reference to users; edits welcome on
merged
___
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
On 17 November 2016 at 16:41, Amir Chaudhry wrote:
> I think the point is that if you already know what you're doing, it's not so
> bad. If you're *not* familiar with it, then it can seem fairly complicated
> compared to other static site generators.
>
Ah right -- yes, I completely agree with t
I think the point is that if you already know what you're doing, it's not so
bad. If you're *not* familiar with it, then it can seem fairly complicated
compared to other static site generators.
Best wishes,
Amir
--
Sent via mobile
> On 17 Nov 2016, at 16:29, Richard Mortier
> wrote:
>
>> O
On 17 November 2016 at 16:06, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> I also acknowledge that it's a royal pain to build mirage-www locally right
> now, so I am working on making it a more lightweight unikernel (by staging
> the HTML generation) as part of the MirageOS3 release efforts. More on that
> when
On 17 Nov 2016, at 15:55, Mindy wrote:
>
> On 11/17/2016 09:47 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the update Thomas; I've converted your notes below into a
>> mirage.io blog post so it's easier to reference to users; edits welcome on :
>> https://github.com/mirage/mirage-www/pull/500
On 11/17/2016 09:47 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
Thanks for the update Thomas; I've converted your notes below into a mirage.io
blog post so it's easier to reference to users; edits welcome on :
https://github.com/mirage/mirage-www/pull/500
I really like the idea of shorter, more frequent blog
Thanks for the update Thomas; I've converted your notes below into a mirage.io
blog post so it's easier to reference to users; edits welcome on :
https://github.com/mirage/mirage-www/pull/500
regards,
Anil
> On 17 Nov 2016, at 12:06, Thomas Gazagnaire wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am in the proce
> The question is - should the xen build of Solo5/MirageOS boot on EC2?
Just to clarify, Solo5 is only used for the virtio and ukvm backends, the
Xen backend is not related to Solo5.
> The virtio build boots OK on EC2, but without network driver.
> The xen build does not boot on EC2, grub says “
Hi all,
I am in the process of releasing Irmin 0.12.0[1] which brings support for
native file-system watchers, to improve the performance of watches.
Previously, an Irmin apps who wanted to use watches would set-up file-system
scanning/polling by doing:
let () = Irmin_unix.install_dir_pol
14 matches
Mail list logo
