Hi Anil,
Thanks a lot for the comments! We'll try to use ocamlclean
Regards,
Wassim H.
On Monday, November 23, 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> Hi Wassim,
>
> It's definitely possible to get the image size of MirageOS builds down
> from where they are right now. As background, there are two
Hi Amir,
Thanks for the note. I just added it to the agenda.
Regards,
Wassim H.
On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Amir Chaudhry wrote:
> Hello Wassim,
>
> There are likely further things that can be done to reduce image size but
> I’m not sure of the status of that work. It might be time to r
Hi Wassim,
It's definitely possible to get the image size of MirageOS builds down from
where they are right now. As background, there are two ways to build unikernel
images:
- Native code compilation: this generates fast x86_64/ARM unikernels that link
against the OCaml 'libasmrun' runtime to
Hello Wassim,
There are likely further things that can be done to reduce image size but I’m
not sure of the status of that work. It might be time to revisit some of that
to see where it stands.
If you add an agenda item to the next MirageOS call (and join the call too)
[1], then we can rememb
Dear colleagues,
A question please about the size of unikernel images:
I built mirage console "hello world" and the stripped disk image size is
3.2 MBytes. The runtime memory required to run the image is ~ 9 MBytes. Is
it possible to reduce futher the memory footprint?
Thanks much!
Wassim H.
_
