People, please follow the steps outlines on http://httpd.apache.org/
The following are mirrors that are no longer valid, meaning 1 of the following
1) They are un-reachable
2) They do not contain the latest version of apache
3) They are running a version of apache pre-dating 1.3.26
Does anyone
Hi Mr Andrew,
I'm refering to http://myapache.i-ownur.info/ mirror url. I have change the pointing of our mirror to http://myapache.mybsd.org.my/. Just want some confirmation. Did I still need to upgrade my apache after I do the patches of my apache?
Here are the thing from my update.
[EMAIL
Just ignore this e-mail. It done already after I have some e-mail with Mr. Andrew. I think my e-mail can't go through coz the e-mail add that submit to mailing-list is different one.
Sorry about this.
Ikmal.
"myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mr Andrew,
I'm refering to
Hello Andrew,
I run http://apache.insync.za.net
The box is still running RedHat 7.0 and hence is running the latest from
RedHat. I will update the box to 8.0 as soon as I get there. I think you
should be focussing on rather looking at the content of the mirror (e.g.
the header html files etc)
* Andrew Kenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
People, please follow the steps outlines on http://httpd.apache.org/
The following are mirrors that are no longer valid, meaning 1 of the following
1) They are un-reachable
2) They do not contain the latest version of apache
3) They are running a
Actually Andrew concern is about security for all apache mirror.
I think this can seatle if every administrator/maintainer apply pathes for theirApache webserver. But how weknow'swhich Apache have been patch or not.I think that's why Andrew want to do like that.
Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would completely disagree. Assuming that they are not vulnerable because
of apache's version number is a bad assumption.
For instance, I'm running 1.3.23 patched to a particular level (not saying)
that has eliminated all vulnerabilities currently offered. My operating
system maintainer
* myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Actually Andrew concern is about security for all apache mirror.
I think this can seatle if every administrator/maintainer apply pathes for
their Apache webserver. But how we know's which Apache have been patch or
not. I think
http://apache.en.com.sg
Upz :)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mirror Update time
People, please follow the steps outlines on http://httpd.apache.org/
The following are mirrors
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
* myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Actually Andrew concern is about security for all apache mirror.
I think this can seatle if every administrator/maintainer apply pathes for
their Apache webserver. But
* Ken Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
* myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Actually Andrew concern is about security for all apache mirror.
I think this can seatle if every administrator/maintainer
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:49:20PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
Unpatched versions, yes. As I said earlier in the thread, most distributions
backport patches to older versions rather than introduce new versions in
stable distributions. How are you planning to test for this?
Ok, I was lost in what
12 matches
Mail list logo
