?
Regards
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 November 2002 3:41 PM
To: Andrew Kenna
Subject: RE: RE: Apache mirror in Malaysia. (Fwd: RE: Mirror Update time)
Hi Mr. Andrew Kenna,
I think I have discuss with you in our
I'll put your mirror back in asap.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 November 2002 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andrew Kenna
Subject: RE: RE: Apache mirror in Malaysia. (Fwd: RE: Mirror Update time)
Actually
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org wrote:
How about do some testing on it using slapper exploit(I mean for mirror that
running Red Hat).
p/s: Sorry for my bad idea and I also not blaming Red Hat.
Andrew Kenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Thats my thoughts too, but obviously
2002 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mirror Update time
* Andrew Kenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
People, please follow the steps outlines on http://httpd.apache.org/
The following are mirrors that are no longer valid, meaning 1 of the following
1) They are un-reachable
2) They do
How about do some testing on it using slapper exploit(I mean for mirror that running Red Hat).
p/s: Sorry for my bad idea and I also not blaming Red Hat.
Andrew Kenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats my thoughts too, but obviously people being people all have their different opinions on things.I'm
a fresh version that has all patches inbuilt into the proper
source files you would be assured that it will work securely.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Scott Kveton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mirror Update time
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Haesu wrote:
Hello,
I personally believe that everyone operating the mirror must run
at least 1.3.26 or above.. I mean it would be better if all the mirrors
are *totally secure* from any possibilities of exploits, rather than just
cutting
Hi Mr Andrew,
I'm refering to http://myapache.i-ownur.info/ mirror url. I have change the pointing of our mirror to http://myapache.mybsd.org.my/. Just want some confirmation. Did I still need to upgrade my apache after I do the patches of my apache?
Here are the thing from my update.
[EMAIL
Just ignore this e-mail. It done already after I have some e-mail with Mr. Andrew. I think my e-mail can't go through coz the e-mail add that submit to mailing-list is different one.
Sorry about this.
Ikmal.
"myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mr Andrew,
I'm refering to
Hello Andrew,
I run http://apache.insync.za.net
The box is still running RedHat 7.0 and hence is running the latest from
RedHat. I will update the box to 8.0 as soon as I get there. I think you
should be focussing on rather looking at the content of the mirror (e.g.
the header html files etc)
* Andrew Kenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
People, please follow the steps outlines on http://httpd.apache.org/
The following are mirrors that are no longer valid, meaning 1 of the following
1) They are un-reachable
2) They do not contain the latest version of apache
3) They are running a
Actually Andrew concern is about security for all apache mirror.
I think this can seatle if every administrator/maintainer apply pathes for theirApache webserver. But how weknow'swhich Apache have been patch or not.I think that's why Andrew want to do like that.
Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mirror Update time
So you want to remove people that aren't running 1.3.26 or greater
because?
Andrew Kenna wrote:
People, please follow the steps outlines on http://httpd.apache.org/
The following are mirrors that are no longer valid, meaning 1
* myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Actually Andrew concern is about security for all apache mirror.
I think this can seatle if every administrator/maintainer apply pathes for
their Apache webserver. But how we know's which Apache have been patch or
not. I think
http://apache.en.com.sg
Upz :)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mirror Update time
People, please follow the steps outlines on http://httpd.apache.org/
The following are mirrors
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
* myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Actually Andrew concern is about security for all apache mirror.
I think this can seatle if every administrator/maintainer apply pathes for
their Apache webserver. But
* Ken Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
* myfriend.is.not.my.enemies.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Actually Andrew concern is about security for all apache mirror.
I think this can seatle if every administrator/maintainer
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:49:20PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
Unpatched versions, yes. As I said earlier in the thread, most distributions
backport patches to older versions rather than introduce new versions in
stable distributions. How are you planning to test for this?
Ok, I was lost in what
18 matches
Mail list logo
