Good luck to our community members in the New Orleans and greater Gulf of
Mexico coastline.
- Eric
Just to let you know, I spend better part of night configuring my old
setup in VMWare machines and everything work as expected.
I will try add NATing if I found time.
Best regards
Petr R.
On 8/23/05, Steve Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have several sites linked with ipsec on
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I want to chroot an application I'm developing, but I still want
coredumps...
_dump.c_
#include
int main() {
abort();
}
# gcc dump.c -o dump
# ./dump
Abort trap (core dumped)
# chroot ./ ./dump
Abort trap[note
This patch is in no way intended for real use, and does not really do
anything other than provide me with a completely useless placebo effect.
But thought I would pass it on.
http://www.linbsd.org/openssh-samepasswd.patch
What it tries to do, and this remains to be seen, is slowdown the
seque
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 07:17:39PM -0400, resonant evil wrote:
> Hi all
>
> New user here.. I was trying to install OpenBSD, so I burned the cd
> 37.iso to a bootable CD, then partition my harddrive accordingly in
> setup, setup root disk, etc.. But when it's time for me to select my
> method of g
Is there any hope to see the "live network backup" that NetBSD's developer
"der Mouse" presented at BSDCan 2005?
( http://www.bsdcan.org/2005/activity.php?id=54 )
I may not be a developer of OpenBSD, but I think that anything Mike Parker
says or does should be ignored, just because of the kind
Hi all
New user here.. I was trying to install OpenBSD, so I burned the cd
37.iso to a bootable CD, then partition my harddrive accordingly in
setup, setup root disk, etc.. But when it's time for me to select my
method of getting the system (which would be FTP or HTTP) the net
instantly fails, so
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Ed White wrote:
> And by the way, do you think that NetBSD's cgd is poo too, or do you plan to
> import it?
do you think the archives are poo too, or do you plan to read them?
--
And that's why it's so good.
man Chan wrote:
> I have a R51. Is there any difference if I installed
> the current-i386 on it using external disk through usb
> connection ?
You can try: if you see you dmesg including a line like:
aps0 at isa0 port 0x1600/31
Then please try looking at the output of "sysctl hw.sensors" and se
On Sunday 28 August 2005 14:49, Shane J Pearson wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 29/08/2005, at 3:49 AM, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 28 August 2005 10:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> --On 28 August 2005 10:22 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> A long time ago I added a little bios co
Hi Dave,
On 29/08/2005, at 3:49 AM, Dave Feustel wrote:
On Sunday 28 August 2005 10:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 28 August 2005 10:22 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
A long time ago I added a little bios code to my pc
by programming and installing an eprom on a
post card. The code was execu
> I want to chroot an application I'm developing, but I still want
> coredumps...
>
> _dump.c_
> #include
> int main() {
> abort();
> }
>
>
> # gcc dump.c -o dump
> # ./dump
> Abort trap (core dumped)
> # chroot ./ ./dump
> Abort trap
Kent Watsen wrote:
> I want to chroot an application I'm developing, but I still want
> coredumps...
This fixes it:
echo 'ulimit -c unlimited' > /root/.profile
# Han
> I want a raid model that acts as if it is a regular scsi drive, ie.
> sdN. Like our hardware raid controllers work. Right now what we
> have in the tree is poo, and vinum is just as much poo too.
Is there any hope to see the "live network backup" that NetBSD's developer
"der Mouse" presented
Hi,
I want to chroot an application I'm developing, but I still want
coredumps...
_dump.c_
#include
int main() {
abort();
}
# gcc dump.c -o dump
# ./dump
Abort trap (core dumped)
# chroot ./ ./dump
Abort trap[note that no c
On Sunday 28 August 2005 10:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> --On 28 August 2005 10:22 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> > A long time ago I added a little bios code to my pc
> > by programming and installing an eprom on a
> > post card. The code was executed at boot time before
> > most of the bios cod
On Sunday 28 August 2005 10:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> --On 28 August 2005 10:22 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> > A long time ago I added a little bios code to my pc
> > by programming and installing an eprom on a
> > post card. The code was executed at boot time before
> > most of the bios cod
Sorry, here is a bit more:
Aug 28 18:54:26 djerba sm-mta[4559]: STARTTLS=server, error: accept failed=-1,
SSL_error=1, timedout=0, errno=0
Aug 28 18:54:26 djerba sm-mta[4559]: STARTTLS=server: 4559:error:1408F10B:SSL
routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong
version number:/usr/src/lib/libssl/src/ssl/s3_p
Hi,
Thank you for answerING, unfortunately it did not help still the same problem:
server says this:
Aug 28 18:44:54 djerba sm-mta[16232]: STARTTLS=server, error: accept failed=-1,
SSL_error=2, timedout=0, errno=4
And webis client says this:
Transport error: the server did not respond properly af
Here is the error code when I try to send an email via the "pocket pc":
Aug 28 18:44:54 djerba sm-mta[16232]: STARTTLS=server, error: accept failed=-1,
SSL_error=2, timedout=0, errno=4
> Hi,
> (I'm sendmail and openssl novice)
>
> I'm setting up my first email server.
> I followed this article
--On 28 August 2005 10:22 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
A long time ago I added a little bios code to my pc
by programming and installing an eprom on a
post card. The code was executed at boot time before
most of the bios code was executed.
Is this still possible with current desktops?
Yes, it's
*sigh* found this sitting on the "not done" pile from over a week ago... 8-/
Dave Wickberg wrote:
> On 8/19/05, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dave Wickberg wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've just recently installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Release) on a Celeron 466 w/
>> > 256MB of RAM.
>> >
>> > I c
A long time ago I added a little bios code to my pc
by programming and installing an eprom on a
post card. The code was executed at boot time before
most of the bios code was executed.
Is this still possible with current desktops?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware
Robert Storey wrote:
> Glad that somebody else broached this topic, I was about to ask the same
> question.
No. Your problem is completely unrelated to a Sunblade 100.
You've hijacked someone else's thread.
Your report is useless.
It is DEAD WRONG. USB keyboards work just fine on i386 machine,
--- Jesper Louis Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ;!!G
> imEnsion wrote:
> > I have a thinkpad x22.. not sure if I can help,
> but if i can slap a
> > snapshot on the lappy, would it be of any help?
>
> Unfortunately not:
>
> >>Can people with the following laptops:
> >>
> >>- ThinkPad R50, R50p, R5
Hi,
(I'm sendmail and openssl novice)
I'm setting up my first email server.
I followed this article:
http://www.pingwales.co.uk/tutorials/openbsd-mail-server-config.html
I found this article really useful as I wanted to keep the standard openbsd
installation as clean and as original as possible.
imEnsion wrote:
I have a thinkpad x22.. not sure if I can help, but if i can slap a
snapshot on the lappy, would it be of any help?
Unfortunately not:
Can people with the following laptops:
- ThinkPad R50, R50p, R51, R52
- ThinkPad T41, T41p, T42, T42p, T43, T43p
- ThinkPad X40
- ThinkPad X4
Hi
i want to know if some folks from openbsd (or others) have a solution
for L7 failover. more precisely, what are good solutions for a proxy (be
it, http, ftp, smtp, or else; transparent or not) to have active/active
failover or active/passive but in all case keep sessions ? or best is to
use de
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Jim Razmus wrote:
> Just curious, what does the dev team think about Vinum?
the conclusion is it doesn't do anything you can't do now.
--
And that's why I started this thread.
29 matches
Mail list logo