On 9/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> how does openbsd's RAID support stack up to the other *BSDs?
> >
> >on a scale of 1 to 10, it's an awesome.
> >
> >--
> >And that's why your software sucks.
> >
>
> just how awesome is it?
>
> when i read theo's anouncement i thought t
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:10:59PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> On Friday 09 September 2005 15:12, Alexander Hall wrote:
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/
>
> Hmm. Interesting. I'm not quite sure yet just what this is,
You can learn more about it here:
http://www.freebsd.org/proje
Hello Stuart, I'll check those files.
On routed I cannot figure out how to get the 2nd nic to allow other
computers to connect to the OpenBSD firewall.
Should be pretty simple but I can't figure it out. internet ext_if de1
OpenBSD int_if de2
ppp -ddial -unit0 pppoe
I'll keep working on thi
Hello Eric, I tried to figure out why it is starting in two places. I have
placed in rc.conf.local
up de1
ppp -ddial -unit0 pppoe
as suggested by someone and I get the adsl to stay on tun0 but when booting
stills shows twice.
I tried removing from ppp.conf
redial from Default:
and
dial from ppp
>> how does openbsd's RAID support stack up to the other *BSDs?
>
>on a scale of 1 to 10, it's an awesome.
>
>--
>And that's why your software sucks.
>
just how awesome is it?
when i read theo's anouncement i thought to myself "this is
missing something". your having mentioned how awesome it is
On Friday 09 September 2005 15:12, Alexander Hall wrote:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/
Hmm. Interesting. I'm not quite sure yet just what this is,
but it looks useful and I'm putting the link in my OpenBSD
link file and will spend some time examining it.
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
> how does openbsd's RAID support stack up to the other *BSDs?
on a scale of 1 to 10, it's an awesome.
--
And that's why your software sucks.
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Tim wrote:
> Is there anything related to OpenBSD that would be worth investigating or
> researching?
what are you interested in?
--
And that's why the brain is a differential or logical phenomenon
instead of a material phenomenon like a concrete block.
how does openbsd's RAID support stack up to the other *BSDs?
On 9/10/05, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought it was time to give some details about the (minimal) RAID
> management stuff coming in OpenBSD 3.8. Most of this code has been
> written by Marco Peereboom with some help
Just an FYI for some Compaq users out there who might run into this:
3.8 (GENERIC.MP, self-compiled from sources a few days or couple of
weeks back) sees only 16MB RAM on a Proliant 800 that I am using (Dual
Pentium Pro 200, 256MB, dmesg below).
3.7-stable saw all of the physically installed (and
I installed OpenBSD 3.7 on a Compaq Presario 5304. That is an old
(about 7 years old I believe) PC. The dmesg is appended to this
email.
I noticed two rather strange problems during the installation and the
post-installation.
During the installation, at the disklabeling step, I entered "a a" to
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 03:18:24PM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> That's probably a quick one:
>
> mtu - IPheader - TCPheader = max-mss?
>
> E.g. for ethernet:
>
> 1500 - 20 - 20 = 1460?
i use the max-mss like this:
scrub on $t all fragment reassemble reassemble tcp no-df random
Theo,
this is cool stuff!
Very elegant solution. In Linux you have to hope your vendor has some
kind of management tool, and if there is one, you have to hope it
works.
I hope more devices will be supported soon.
Wijnand
Martin Schrvder wrote:
On 2005-09-09 17:39:37 +0200, Tim wrote:
Is there anything related to OpenBSD that would be worth investigating or researching?
Yes: Is there anything related to OpenBSD that would be worth investigating or
researching? :-)
How about http://openbsd.org/query-pr.html
I thought it was time to give some details about the (minimal) RAID
management stuff coming in OpenBSD 3.8. Most of this code has been
written by Marco Peereboom with some help from David Gwynne and
Michael Shalayeff. Moral support and direction from me and Bob Beck
who has a pile of these AMI se
Dave Feustel wrote:
I have not seen a sitemap for openbsd.org.
Is there one? If not, how hard would it be to
create one and add a link to the website for it?
What about http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/ ? :-)
I have not seen a sitemap for openbsd.org.
Is there one? If not, how hard would it be to
create one and add a link to the website for it?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
On 2005-09-09 17:39:37 +0200, Tim wrote:
> Is there anything related to OpenBSD that would be worth investigating or
> researching?
Yes: Is there anything related to OpenBSD that would be worth investigating or
researching? :-)
SCNR
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2005, at 1:05 PM, Hans van Leeuwen wrote:
>
>
> <..snip..>
>
>> My all-time record is 3726 seconds.
>> That's not chuckling, that's rolling on the floor laughing out loud :-)
>>
>
> I had to check my logs and I found
>
[...]
> 19511 seconds.
On 9/8/05, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Siju George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of my friends sent me this new OpenBSD website design he created.
> > Please have a look at it :-D
> >
> > http://mayuresh.freeshell.org/openbsd/
> >
> > Thankyou so much
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > Siju
>
On Sep 9, 2005, at 1:05 PM, Hans van Leeuwen wrote:
<..snip..>
My all-time record is 3726 seconds.
That's not chuckling, that's rolling on the floor laughing out
loud :-)
I had to check my logs and I found
# grep 81.71.83.132 daemon*
daemon.62:Jul 8 11:13:21 zeus spamd[13726]: 81.71.83
Kevin wrote:
>Sep 8 11:47:11 mail spamd[19133]: 61.159.253.63: disconnected after
>408 seconds. lists: china
>Sep 8 12:10:16 mail spamd[19133]: 211.193.204.4: disconnected after
>77 seconds. lists: korea
>Sep 8 14:22:23 mail spamd[2121]: 61.100.12.105: disconnected after 54
>seconds. lists: kor
Is there anything related to OpenBSD that would be worth investigating or
researching?
On 9/5/05, Fletch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greets
>
> I am setting up an openbsd router to manage a companies intenet access,
> and would like to deploy volume based internet usage. I have setup
> squid, but it doesn't seem to have any options to limit a user by volume
> of traffic, only ban
That's probably a quick one:
mtu - IPheader - TCPheader = max-mss?
E.g. for ethernet:
1500 - 20 - 20 = 1460?
Thanks! BTW: What's a good value for max-ttl? I do understand what it
does but I don't see the reason behind it ...
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
Inst
Damien Miller wrote:
As in unauthenticated distribution of private account data via DNS?
I strongly doubt it.
Well, that's what NIS does (unauthenticated distribution of private
account), right ?
And if you use kerberos for storing passwords, it does not look like
such an issue... or am I wro
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
And what about hesiod ? Was it ever considered to be included ?
As in unauthenticated distribution of private account data via DNS?
I strongly doubt it.
-d
Hello
This is a little bit offtopic but, I like website OpenBSD Journal, and
recently the site had many troubles. For this month I have not seen one week
without "blackout". For now the site is unreachable again. Maybe it would be
great to have other webhosting for it.
MK
Damien Miller wrote:
Lots of us would like something like nsswitch, but none of us want an
implementation that uses shared libraries to do it. It should be
fairly easy to delegate getpw* and getgr* via a local unix domain
socket (which works nicely for chroot apps too), but there are some
subleti
On 09/09/2005, at 5:07 PM, Roger Neth Jr wrote:
Hello List,
I don't know how to have ppp pppoe stay on one tun as it is switching
between tun0 and tun1 on reboots.
andrew# page rc.conf.local
config de1 up
ppp -ddial pppoe
you want to use the -unit argument to ppp to bind it to a particu
Lukasz Sztachanski wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi...
Some months ago, a patch to import nsswitch into OpenBSD was post on tech@ :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=110098242313143&w=2
I was wondering if there was any ongoing work on n
--On 09 September 2005 10:38 +0200, Eric Dillenseger wrote:
You may want to check in /etc/ppp/ppp.link{up|down} or
/etc/rc.conf(.local). Do you start ppp in /etc/rc ? as I can see, it
starts before /etc/rc initializes the network and then another time
Maybe in rc.local and hostname.tun0.
--On
On 9/9/05, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello List,
>
>
>
> I don't know how to have ppp pppoe stay on one tun as it is switching
> between tun0 and tun1 on reboots.
>
(snip)
>
Hi Roger,
I'm wondering if you're not starting ppp in 2 places during startup
as, it looks like ppp s
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Hi...
>
> Some months ago, a patch to import nsswitch into OpenBSD was post on tech@ :
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=110098242313143&w=2
>
> I was wondering if there was any ongoing work on nsswitch or equiv
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 9 02:04:40 2005
Received: from mtl-smtpgw2.global.avidww.com (mtl-smtpgw2.global.avidww.com
[172.24.33.104])
by paperboy.global.avidww.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id
j8964dvQ000723
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 02:04:40 -0400
Received
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:39:00 +0200, Guido Tschakert wrote:
>Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
>> Gaby vanhegan wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, correct, my bad... Or perhaps this would work also:
>>>
>>> block out on $if_dmz keep state
>>> pass out on $if_dmz from {$if_lan, $if_inet} to 1.2.3.4 port smtp
>>> keep st
Hello List,
I don't know how to have ppp pppoe stay on one tun as it is switching
between tun0 and tun1 on reboots.
I have routed in rc.conf as routed="-q" but don't understand how to
configure any further to have the internet shared with other computers.
I can't figure out how to set the gat
Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Yes, correct, my bad... Or perhaps this would work also:
block out on $if_dmz keep state
pass out on $if_dmz from {$if_lan, $if_inet} to 1.2.3.4 port smtp
keep state
Maybe that was what I intended to write... :)
Ok, I am now playing with 'fw
Ray cyth.net> writes:
> Oct 11 09:29:24 sparky ntpd[30592]: dispatch_imsg in main: pipe closed
I've encountered this on several GNU/Linux boxen and tracked it down to
| listen on *
When I replace this by
| listen on ::
everything works fine.
On BSD systems, you have to use
| listen on ::
| lis
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Yes, correct, my bad... Or perhaps this would work also:
block out on $if_dmz keep state
pass out on $if_dmz from {$if_lan, $if_inet} to 1.2.3.4 port smtp
keep state
Maybe that was what I intended to write... :)
Ok, I am now playing with 'fwbuilder' to see how the genera
Nico Meijer wrote:
Well, if I suggested to port netfilter to OpenBSD I would most
probably be killed in seconds. ;)
If you're lucky. ;-)
You might want to check http://openbsd.unixtech.be/books.html and more
specifically get a hold of Jacek's book.
Thanks, Nico - I'll have a look.
--
Ste
41 matches
Mail list logo
