new snapshots, special treats

2005-12-24 Thread Theo de Raadt
the new i386 snapshot heading out now contains a few uncommited little pieces which enable a potpourri of i2c goodness. mostly, this will provide some sensor stuff to people who do not have ipmi(4) or esm(4) support. i2c "sensor" devices appear on lots of machines (not just i386). some might hav

[Terra Mail] Alerta de Seguran�a !!

2005-12-24 Thread Terra Mail
Detectamos que seu e-mail esta enviando mensagems contaminadas com o vmrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uma variante do vmrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] O worm [EMAIL PROTECTED] i: * Uma variante do vmrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Um worm de distribuigco em massa que tambim se propaga atravis dos compartilhamento

Re: utilizing screen real estate without X

2005-12-24 Thread Michael Steinfeld
For my next trick I can pick the correct lottery numbers moments after the drawing. --thanks On 12/24/05, Ray Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 24, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Michael Steinfeld wrote: > > > Currently, I do not run X on my openbsd box and really would rather > > not. I am

Re: utilizing screen real estate without X

2005-12-24 Thread Ray Percival
On Dec 24, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Michael Steinfeld wrote: Currently, I do not run X on my openbsd box and really would rather not. I am thinking of a way to have multiple ttys available for monitoring without switching back and forth between them. It might seem silly to some, when you have a dual he

Re: Xwindows Security Hole in OpenBSD 3.8

2005-12-24 Thread Ray Percival
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Dec 24, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Edd Barrett wrote: On 24/12/05, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hate to send this Christmas present to misc, but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows One wonders how software that doesn't exist c

Re: Xwindows Security Hole in OpenBSD 3.8

2005-12-24 Thread Edd Barrett
On 24/12/05, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I hate to send this Christmas present to misc, > but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows > which permits exploits to be committed at least > with user permissions, if not root permissions. > Since the problem appears to be in Xwin

utilizing screen real estate without X

2005-12-24 Thread Michael Steinfeld
Currently, I do not run X on my openbsd box and really would rather not. I am thinking of a way to have multiple ttys available for monitoring without switching back and forth between them. It might seem silly to some, when you have a dual headed vidcard and multiple displays and prefer not to use

Re: Xwindows Security Hole in OpenBSD 3.8

2005-12-24 Thread Simon Morgan
On 24/12/05, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What kind of post is this? > > Dave Feustel wrote: > > I hate to send this Christmas present to misc, > > but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows > > which permits exploits to be committed at least > > with user permissions, if not root per

Re: Xwindows Security Hole in OpenBSD 3.8

2005-12-24 Thread Dave Feustel
On Saturday 24 December 2005 14:57, Matthew Closson wrote: > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > I hate to send this Christmas present to misc, > > but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows > > which permits exploits to be committed at least > > with user permissions, if not r

Re: Xwindows Security Hole in OpenBSD 3.8

2005-12-24 Thread Rico
What kind of post is this? Rico Dave Feustel wrote: I hate to send this Christmas present to misc, but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows which permits exploits to be committed at least with user permissions, if not root permissions. Since the problem appears to be in Xwindows, usi

Re: Xwindows Security Hole in OpenBSD 3.8

2005-12-24 Thread Simon Morgan
On 24/12/05, Matthew Closson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > I hate to send this Christmas present to misc, > > but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows > > which permits exploits to be committed at least > > with user permissions, if not root

Re: Xwindows Security Hole in OpenBSD 3.8

2005-12-24 Thread Matthew Closson
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Dave Feustel wrote: I hate to send this Christmas present to misc, but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows which permits exploits to be committed at least with user permissions, if not root permissions. Since the problem appears to be in Xwindows, using KDE may b

Re: How to log all entered commands?

2005-12-24 Thread Jonathan Glaschke
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 07:41:45PM +0100, MK wrote: > Unfortunately not, because there is no timestamp in the log file and there > is no easy way how to analyze which user executed particular command on the > system. I'm looking for something such as logs generated by sudo. There actual is a times

Xwindows Security Hole in OpenBSD 3.8

2005-12-24 Thread Dave Feustel
I hate to send this Christmas present to misc, but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows which permits exploits to be committed at least with user permissions, if not root permissions. Since the problem appears to be in Xwindows, using KDE may be inadviseable. I'm considering going back t

Re: Backup Techniques onto DVD+-RW

2005-12-24 Thread Nick Holland
Steve Shockley wrote: > Whyzzi wrote: >> Hi gang. Running a lightweight mail server here (50 users total) on >> OpenBSD, and being the cheap bastard that I am I am looking forward to >> scripting a nightly backup onto some DVD-RW media. Can I assume that >> dump/restore is out of the question becau

Re: How to log all entered commands?

2005-12-24 Thread MK
Unfortunately not, because there is no timestamp in the log file and there is no easy way how to analyze which user executed particular command on the system. I'm looking for something such as logs generated by sudo. Thanks anyway MK - Original Message - From: "Siju George" <[EMAIL PR

Re: How to log all entered commands?

2005-12-24 Thread Siju George
On 12/24/05, MK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I'm trying to log all command which are entered by users but till now still > without success. I think I was close with "accton" and "lastcomm" commands > but unfortunetaly it logs only commands without parameters, so for instance > if I disabl

Re: How to log all entered commands?

2005-12-24 Thread MK
Thank you for your suggestion. But there is some problem during the source compile. In fact I have same problem as described here: http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=27287 and of course there is no answer. :( Thank you MK - Original Message - From: "Stuart Henderson"

Re: How to log all entered commands?

2005-12-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
> > I'm trying to log all command which are entered by users but till now > > still without success. sudosh, but it's not in ports.

Re: How to log all entered commands?

2005-12-24 Thread Qv6
On Saturday 24 December 2005 05:16 am, MK wrote: > Hello > > I'm trying to log all command which are entered by users but till now > still without success. I think I was close with "accton" and > "lastcomm" commands but unfortunetaly it logs only commands without > parameters, so for instance if I

How to log all entered commands?

2005-12-24 Thread MK
Hello I'm trying to log all command which are entered by users but till now still without success. I think I was close with "accton" and "lastcomm" commands but unfortunetaly it logs only commands without parameters, so for instance if I disable pf, "pfctl -d" I have in log only pfctl so there

Re: NAT/pf before IPSEC

2005-12-24 Thread Stephan Leemburg
Sorry for the late reply. Indeed 192.168.8.254 is the IP Address of the internal NIC. In fact I only have one NIC on my OpenBSD Server (it's a Mac Cube, so I cannot add another one). It's setup as the default router for the other systems (through DHCP). Below is the contents of my isakmpd.c