After spending over 30 minutes figuring out why a firewall refused to load
its config (turned out that the PCI card had unwedged itself).
Dw
*** pfctl.c.org Tue Jan 31 07:40:08 2006
--- pfctl.c Tue Jan 31 07:43:27 2006
***
*** 1358,1364
return (1);
}
Thank you guys,
Setting Linux as OS in the BIOS did the trick ! top(1) now reports 2 CPUs.
OS was previously setted at 'Other'.
Is there some stability/performance advantage in upgrading the
Proliant Firmware ?
Here's the new dmesg :
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC.MP) #298: Sat Sep 10 15:51:54 MDT 2005
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:37:07PM -0300, Andr??s Delfino wrote:
> Or... somehow I changed that word when sending the message. Anyway,
> this is the correct diff:
>
> --- license.templateTue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
> +++ license.template.1 Sun Jan 29 12:33:55 2006
> @@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
> should b
Howdy, I am running 3.9 on my clamshell iBook. The trackpad has tap-click now!
I have missed it. However, the behavior is not good. I want to get rid of
drag capability without clicking. Every time I try to move the mouse I'm
highlighting, and I haven't outsmarted it yet. The man pages hav
On 1/30/06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My problem, though, is with permissions. If I'm not logged in as root
> I can't write on /home which kind of defeats the purpose of reserving
> /home for user directories.
>
> I unmounted /home again and tried to change the permissions on it:
>
I can be done, have a look at man mount_msdos that should be all you need
it can be done. have a look at the examples in man fstab to see how you
use them.
On Mon, January 30, 2006 6:59 pm, Nick Guenther said:
> So my two questions are:
> 1) how can I set the permissions on /home|why can't I set
Nick Holland wrote:
Oh, and what's with that picture on www.openbsd.org (lower-right corner)?
It is a cluster of computers using OpenBSD.
They're all firewalls; Theo gets hit with a lot of malicious traffic.
Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
Everything seems to work fine but OpenBSD find only one CPU ! :(
Somebody know why and how can I use the 2 CPUs ?
I have a DL380 G1 (as well as two 1850s) running OpenBSD, works fine
with dual CPUs. As others mentioned, try changing the OS type to Linux
or Other.
This
I dual boot OpenBSD with Windows and have a third partition for data
which is mounted on /home. The data partition is FAT32 since that's
the only type that both OSes support well.
# fdisk wd0
Disk: wd0 geometry: 2432/255/63 [39070080 Sectors]
Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55
Starti
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 04:40:29PM +0100, mickey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 05:46:17PM +1100, Nicholas Young wrote:
> > Hello
> re
>
> > When booting with the standard kernel everything works fine and I
> > can login/use the machine, run stress without any errors.
> >
> > When booting with
If you talk about obvious things, then a four-digit year is an obvious
one... A two-digit one is stupid (maybe Jesus left some hack?)...
On 1/30/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AndrC)s Delfino wrote:
> > Maybe it may help someone, :P
> >
> > --- license.template Tue Jun 3 19:3
AndrC)s Delfino wrote:
> Maybe it may help someone, :P
>
> --- license.template Tue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
> +++ license.template.1 Sun Jan 29 10:00:22 2006
> @@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
> should be separated by a comma, e.g.
> Copyright (c) 2003, 2004
>
> +Note that less than and greater than s
Gabriel George POPA wrote:
...
> Oh, and what's with that picture on www.openbsd.org (lower-right corner)?
It is a cluster of computers using OpenBSD.
Nick.
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2006 20:02 schrieben Sie:
Hi Alex,
> does anydody please know, why can't I set timezone in KDE?
> When I right-click on the clock -> Show timezone -> Configure timezones
> then there is only one timezone - UTC. And the KDE clock is off by 1h.
Got the same issue here. This
I have been having issues lately with the HiFn based crypto cards
locking up in 3.7 and 3.8.
They are usually fine but under some undefined load they lock up and
it seems rather random as to when it happens and how much load causes
it.
The cards are used to help out with a VPN between a few
On 2006/01/30 14:22, Joel Gudknecht wrote:
> Does smtp-vilter-1.1.9 included in 3.8 packages suffer from the issue
> discussed in this thread?
1.1.9 is the first version which supplied enough information for the
new Received: line parsing introduced in SA 3.1.0 (but not documented
in their UPGRADE
Hi Thomas
OpenBSD's kerberos5 is heimdal as seen from the `klist --version` output:
klist (heimdal-0.6.3/OpenBSD)
Copyright 1999-2004 Kungliga Tekniska Hvgskolan
Send bug-reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a 2 year old post on usenet describing the same problem, but
there they talk about Open
i've built an openbsd/sparc64 system from the 3.8 cd distribution, boot
media is a compactflash card, i configured a kernel with raidframe, labeled
a pair of disks, and got this console message when i rebuilt parity:
siop0: unable to load data DMA map: 22
sd1: not queued, error 5
siop0: unable to
Those compaqs are odd ones at times. Several compaqs of mine have an
option in the BIOS to initialize the CPUs (the docs tell me that if I
change a CPU, it won't work until I use the BIOS feature.)
Poke around in there.
On Monday 30 January 2006 02:15, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ev
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:22:29PM +0100, Thomas Bvrnert wrote:
> >I'm trying to compile Samba 3.0.21a on OpenBSD 3.8 with active
> > directory enabled and when I run the configure script it fails to find
> > libkrb5. Has anyone recently tried to compile Samba with Active
> > Directory suppo
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:12:54PM -0500, Price, Joe wrote:
> On the far end, the pf rules are simply pass all
>
> On this end the only rules that apply are:
>
> scrub in no-df
>
> nat on $ext_if from !($ext_if) -> ($ext_if:0)
>
> rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to X.X.X.X/32 port ftp -> X.X.
Does the smtp-vilter.conf line "spam-subject-prefix=*SPAM*" override
spamassassins "rewrite_header subject ***SPAM***" (from
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf) because I never see the subject being
modified by spamassassin?
Thanks,
-JG
not on openbsd, but i think you need heimdal and not the krb5
Thomas
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:16 -0500, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
>
>I'm trying to compile Samba 3.0.21a on OpenBSD 3.8 with active
> directory enabled and when I run the configure script it fails to find
> libkrb5. Has anyone
Hello,
Does smtp-vilter-1.1.9 included in 3.8 packages suffer from the issue
discussed in this thread?
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?do=post_view_flat;post=67017;pag
e=2;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;mh=25;list=spamassassin
Specifically this quote:
"Hmm, I've never looked at smtp-v
Hi
I'm trying to compile Samba 3.0.21a on OpenBSD 3.8 with active
directory enabled and when I run the configure script it fails to find
libkrb5. Has anyone recently tried to compile Samba with Active
Directory support enabled?
TIA
Paolo
Thanks Obi, I will try it again when I get home tonight. I don't use WEP on
my network either, for the same reasons.
On 1/30/06, Obi Okeke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Joshua,
> I don't know if this will help, but here is what I do
> to connect to my linksys wireless B router using my
> links
On the far end, the pf rules are simply pass all
On this end the only rules that apply are:
scrub in no-df
nat on $ext_if from !($ext_if) -> ($ext_if:0)
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to X.X.X.X/32 port ftp -> X.X.X.X port
ftp
I tried using cuteftp on a windows box behind the far end, usin
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:30:10 -0700
David Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, but I was wondering if anyone
> could speak to the stability and reliability of RAIDframe in 3.8. I
> find myself really wanting to use software RAID 1 and haven't had any
> problems in
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Dimitri Willemse wrote:
You made it work! Thanks!
Hi...
I'm happy I could help. If you stay connected 24/24, I would really like
to know if after a couple of days the connection is still reliable since,
as I told you in my last mail, mine was loosing more and more packe
On 1/28/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW: As I've probably said here before, memtest86 is a good program, but
> be aware of what any diagnostic can do: IF it tells you you have a
> problem, you probably have a problem. If it says "no problem found", it
> may have just been unable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1/30/06, Bruno Carnazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Everything seems to work fine but OpenBSD find only one CPU ! :(
>> Somebody know why and how can I use the 2 CPUs ?
>>
...
>
> Works fine here on the DL380G4's with -current (worked with release
I have 2 wireless cards, Linksys WPC55AG (atheros) and D-Link DWL-650
rev.M(Realtek 8180). Both cards work fine, I can connect to my home
network under
FreeBSD, Arch Linux and Gentoo Linux with both cards. Atheros natively under
FreeBSD and Realtek using ndis because FreeBSD doesn't have native dri
Hi,
For those who have time to swing by, have a talk with us or even better
help out, for the rest of the week, OpenBSD will be at Solutions Linux
in the CNIT, Paris la Defense
http://www.solutionslinux.fr/fr/index.php
Booth slaves welcome
Wim.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
Last week (January 24, 2006) I updated our gateway to snapshot (i386).
Everything seems to work fine except that users are complaining about
internet-connections being dropped. The main complaint is that it is
possible to use the internet but it is not possible to transfe
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:55:07AM -0500, Patrick Boyer wrote:
> On 1/29/06, Gabriel George POPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> >I'm planning to deploy a small cluster behind my firewall (for test
> > purposes). What would be the recommender program
> > to use f
Last week (January 24, 2006) I updated our gateway to snapshot (i386).
Everything seems to work fine except that users are complaining about
internet-connections being dropped. The main complaint is that it is
possible to use the internet but it is not possible to transfer files. I
checked this
> I've seen both behaviors with greylisting, and other behaviors as well.
> They still don't get past spamd, so I don't worry much about them. There
> are many different behaviors depending on what spam sending software
> they're using, and it'll change somewhat next week or next month. Rather
> th
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Hierarchy
On 1/28/06, James Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 06:30 -0800, Anon Y. Mous wrote:
>
> > How do I restore the default permissions for /etc
> > (and any) directory on
> > my hdd?
>
> See the manpage for mtree(8) and /e
Dear Antoine,
You made it work! Thanks!
I added the -cloning option and used my modem's internal IP (10.0.0.138)
instead of the ISP's router IP and now it works.
Thanks a lot,
Dimitri
From: Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dimitri Willemse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: misc@openbsd.org
S
On 1/30/06, Bruno Carnazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Everything seems to work fine but OpenBSD find only one CPU ! :(
> Somebody know why and how can I use the 2 CPUs ?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Bruno.
>
> Here is the dmesg :
Works fine here on the DL380G4's with -current (worked with
Eric Johnson wrote:
The first type of traffic happens quite often to many different e-mail
addresses. In this case, we see multiple attempts over a short period
of time from a number of different zombies to send e-mail to a single
e-mail address using the same "mail from:".
...
I also see
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 05:46:17PM +1100, Nicholas Young wrote:
> Hello
re
> When booting with the standard kernel everything works fine and I
> can login/use the machine, run stress without any errors.
>
> When booting with the MP kernel it will get to mounting the drive and
> freeze, partial bo
what bigger isn't always better? how unamerican... : )
thanks alot guys, It's good to hear folks have had good experiences with
it. I've already been bitten with the ungraceful way RAIDframe deals with
misconfigs. man, it panics at the first sign of trouble!
On 1/30/06, Dave Diller <[EMAIL PRO
hmm, on Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:12:28AM -0300, Andris Delfino said that
>
> +Note that less than and greater than signs below MUST be removed;
> +they are there for you to enter your own information.
...
> - * Copyright (c) CCYY YOUR NAME HERE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> + * Copyright (c)
as i se
Selon Dimitri Willemse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem is that the default gateway that is supplied by the DHCP server
> is not in the same
> subnet as the IP address (some weird PPP thing?). If I connect a Window$ box
> this doesn't seem
> to be a problem, but my OpenBSD box (3.8) doesn't like
Hi all,
I just changed DSL provider, switching from ADSL1 to ADSL2, so also had to
install a new modem.
The new provider requires me to PPP, but the modem can take care of that,
and forwards the
public IP to my OpenBSD box.
The external NIC is set up with just 'dhcp' in the hostname.if file.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:37:32AM -0200, Joco Salvatti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any way to enable the Fn key of my keyboard in my OpenBSD
> 3.8 and configure the delete key? Because right now the delete key is
> working the same way backspace does, and the Fn key is useless.
Your terminal en
On 1/29/06, Gabriel George POPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>I'm planning to deploy a small cluster behind my firewall (for test
> purposes). What would be the recommender program
> to use for clustering and wht can it do? Where should I start? I have 5
> workstation
On 30/01/06, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-29 13:04]:
> > On 29/01/06, Marco Fretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Probably not. Your box will be limited by the pps it can handle.
> > I don't know exactly what pps your hardware can handle,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:15:20PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Marco Fretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-30 11:19]:
> > anyone did some performance test on this linksys card? i want to buy it
> > for vlan routing? i neet performance up to 500 MBit/s. can i use it for
> > this?
>
> I doubt it i
> The main reason RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, I seem to recall, is that
> it makes the kernel quite a bit bigger for no gain in the average case.
Yeah, 20% or so, with RAIDframe being the only change:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5281094 Sep 16 21:30 bsd-stock-3.8-install
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root whee
* Marco Fretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-30 11:19]:
> anyone did some performance test on this linksys card? i want to buy it
> for vlan routing? i neet performance up to 500 MBit/s. can i use it for
> this?
I doubt it is any good. sk(4) is best, em(4) acceptable.
--
BS Web Services, http://ww
* Marco Fretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-30 08:39]:
> short question: what are actually the supported gigabit nics to pull
> out .1q vlans on an openbsd machine?
all. it's not the hardware that does it.
optimally your card should be able to work with the slighhtly (4 byte)
bigger frames due to
ok, its not found =)
i saw something on the bsd.mp kernel page on openbsd.org about not
supported cpus / machines. may your machine is listed there
regards
marco
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:26 +0400, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
> top show me only one CPU...
>
> load averages: 0.09, 0.11, 0.06
On 26 jan 2006, at 20.09, Bob DeBolt wrote:
Main question is this, why does the 10.x.x.x address come back to
us instead
of timing out??
You only stated "the ping returns", not actually with what. :)
In case the 10.x.x.x box has a problem reaching the next hop, you
should see an ICMP Des
* tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-29 13:04]:
> On 29/01/06, Marco Fretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably not. Your box will be limited by the pps it can handle.
> I don't know exactly what pps your hardware can handle, but I guess
> around 100-200kpps shouldn't be totally unrealisti
Hi,
Have a look at SyMon : http://www.xs4all.nl/~wpd/symon/
It's just a monitor, you CAN NOT act on your server thru this (which
is a better way, I think). For remote admin, use ssh, web is not
appropriate.
Best regards,
Bruno.
On 1/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> guys
top show me only one CPU...
load averages: 0.09, 0.11, 0.06
14:23:20
24 processes: 23 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.2% system, 2.0% interrup
On Monday 30 January 2006 05:57, John Wong wrote:
> after upgrade to 3.9beta/i386, sensorsd can not start
> when i start the sensorsd, it show the error message
>
> shell$: /usr/sbin/sensorsd
> sensorsd: sysctl: No such file or directory
I see the same behaviour on snapshot from Jan 24, i386.
--
hello there
anyone did some performance test on this linksys card? i want to buy it
for vlan routing? i neet performance up to 500 MBit/s. can i use it for
this?
thanks, regards
marco
im really not sure, but i think the secound cpu is not found at the same
time in boot process as the first. i had an ibm intellisation with 2
cpus. the sec cpu was listed in dmesg after mounting fs.
you dont see sec cpu in # top?
any one knows thats ok?
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 12:15 +0400, Bruno
I recently decided to try out greylisting using spamd on OpenBSD and it
has cut my spam load down considerably.
I have the logging set to verbose and when checking /ver/log/daemon, I'm
seeing some interesting traffic.
The first type of traffic happens quite often to many different e-mail
addres
Hi all,
Everything seems to work fine but OpenBSD find only one CPU ! :(
Somebody know why and how can I use the 2 CPUs ?
Thank you,
Bruno.
Here is the dmesg :
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC.MP) #298: Sat Sep 10 15:51:54 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: In
so i can use a cheap d-link gigabit card an can pull out vlans from a
cisco switch?
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 18:42 +1100, Damien Miller wrote:
> Marco Fretz wrote:
> > hello there
> >
> > short question: what are actually the supported gigabit nics to pull
> > out .1q vlans on an openbsd machine?
64 matches
Mail list logo