i've got a single kerberos server for 2 realms with most of the configuration i
want. there are a few things i still need clarification on:
(1) cross-realm authentication; this is discussed in the info page for heimdal
where the following is printed:
"For a two way trust between MY.REALM and OTHE
--- Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can tell someone who has spent too long with
> Windows, they are the ones
> bragging about "uptime", thinking it is a wonderful
> and shocking thing when
> you go over a year without rebooting. Uh..what was
> supposed to happen?
Can you imagine if
Yes. Got several offers and should be getting cables next week.
Thanks to everyone who contacted me off list :-)
Diana Eichert wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Marco Peereboom wrote:
So I really meant SC->LC.
Marco
Did anyone ever pony up a cable for you?
diana
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:31:42PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> And nice to see that OpenBSD is REALLY the only open source project that
> really stick to their goals days in days out!
I had a recent conversation that confirmed this for me. I was talking
with people from different perspectives
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Brian wrote:
> I am in the process of making syslogd more protocol independent (IPv4
> & IPv6). I am just about ready to add a priviledged fuction for
> getnameinfo, but what I do not understand is why the the DNS lookups
> are priviledged separated. I do understand the securi
On April 29, 2006 02:08 pm, Nick Holland wrote:
> I've been watching them try to make programming "easier" and faster for
> almost thirty years
>
this is one of the most thorough and enlightening posts i have seen on any
forum or maillist!! truly filled with aphoristic wisdoms!
i very much a
prad wrote:
[snip]
> (curiously, i've found on my system at least that some
> things seem
> to work faster on openbsd than freebsd.)
>
Shouldn't be a surprise, really.
Efficiency is really more a case of never being too inefficient
rather that occasionally being very efficient. (ie hard.)
Anythi
Nick Holland wrote:
Stability should "just be": The natural result of quality code.
Only cut to make it short, but all great stuff.
It's a funny thing about goals. Lots of people have 'em, few people
live by 'em, or will quickly compromise them for the most trivial of things. Which
of co
it worked, thanks for the tip :)
prad wrote:
On April 29, 2006 02:09 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The state of the art of computer science has gone (steadily?) downhill
for the last 30 (maybe 40) years.
The computers are bigger and faster, but the knowedge of what to do with
them has decayed.
There are a few pockets of resista
I try to mount a nfs share over internet between two openbsd servers.
As faq describes rpcinfo -p on server should show that mountd listen
at "udp: 633 and tcp: 916"
But I get,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ > rpcinfo -p
program vers proto port
102 tcp111 portmapper
102 u
* prad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-29 21:30]:
> openbsd, on the other hand, doesn't even mention performance or stability in
> its goals. (curiously, i've found on my system at least that some things seem
> to work faster on openbsd than freebsd.)
well, stability is a prerequisite to beeing use
On April 29, 2006 02:09 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The state of the art of computer science has gone (steadily?) downhill
> for the last 30 (maybe 40) years.
> The computers are bigger and faster, but the knowedge of what to do with
> them has decayed.
>
> There are a few pockets of resistance
2006/4/29, Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
js wrote:
> I don't want to start holy war, but just out of curiosity.
OpenBSD is, like FreeBSD, much advanced over BSD4.4, so the BSD4.4 book
is not completely useful for hacking on OpenBSD or FreeBSD.
But the FreeBSD book describes how *FreeBSD*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:34:16AM +0200, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
>
>
>>i'm trying since a few hours to get 3.8 on a (linux-based) root-server,
>>without success.
>>
>>
>
>Use -current... otherwise the ServerWorks stuff doesn't gets detected.
>
>
>
>
Will try i
Hi, I'd like to know if OpenBSD dev team is interested or is planning
to include iSCSI support in source tree. I know that NetBSD has
recently implemented a Target iSCSI support (not Initiator), but
NetBSD is not OpenBSD... Thanks
Fulvio
The state of the art of computer science has gone (steadily?) downhill
for the last 30 (maybe 40) years.
The computers are bigger and faster, but the knowedge of what to do with
them has decayed.
That time would it put it at about 1974, when the altair came out,
and home users got to b
The best way to troubleshoot PF issues is to turn on logging and read
the log. This will show you exactly what rule is catching your
packets. Then you can debug easily from there. And also keep in mind
the magic way to troubleshoot PF:
"Think like PF. Be PF."
That is all.
Alex Stamatis w
Hallo Misc !
I have a problem with the Pf.
I dont understand why but for some reason it wont let ports 80 - 15352 pass
even though I have set it up n the configuration. Its been done according to
the faq and pfctl -nf doesnt return any errors at all !!!
Also NAT in the internal network and all co
David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since upgrading to 3.9 I've been having a problem with flakiness from
> my older PCI quad ethernet card. de3 here is a dhcp interface (crappy
> SBC DSL), de2 and de1 are internal (wired and wireless).
>
> the symptoms of failure are that de3 will stop s
2006/4/29, Aaron Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
compare OpenBSD's goals with the FreeBSD project's goals and you
should be able to understand why Theo said what he said.
aaron.glenn
p.s. the offer still stands for a trade, so far no takers )-:
I read both project's goals, however it is not enoug
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:34:16AM +0200, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
> i'm trying since a few hours to get 3.8 on a (linux-based) root-server,
> without success.
Use -current... otherwise the ServerWorks stuff doesn't gets detected.
With kind regards
Simon
* Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-29 08:17]:
> I am just about ready to add a priviledged fuction for getnameinfo, but what I
> do not understand is why the the DNS lookups are priviledged separated.
because getnameinfo requires access to /etc/resolv.conf,
maybe /etc/hosts, maybe YP maps and s
js wrote:
>
> 2006/4/28, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I wonder why http://www.openbsd.org/books.html still recommend old
> > > daemon book, The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating
> > > System?
> > > As most of you know, there's newer version, The Design and
> > > Implem
Christian Pedaschus wrote:
> i'm trying since a few hours to get 3.8 on a (linux-based) root-server,
> without success. I googled some tutorials (for ex.
> http://wiki.bsd-crew.de/index.php?title=Strato-Rootserver_mit_NetBSD&redirect=no)
> but they don't seem to work
> ...
> Anybody got a better wa
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:29:12PM +0700, riwanlky wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am trying to install pfstat in my OpenBSD 3.8 box, I am new in Unix-like
> OS,
> I need to know how to compile the pfstat.
>
> Many thanks in advance.
>
pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.8/packages/`uname -m`/pfstat
On Saturday 29 April 2006 02.00, John Brahy wrote:
> How do I configure cyrus imapd to retrieve mail from normal unix mailboxes
> and validate against the unix password? I have been trying to find info on
> it and I can't find anything that works with v2.2.12 from 3.8 ports. Can
> someone point me
hi,
I am trying to install pfstat in my OpenBSD 3.8 box, I am new in Unix-like OS,
I need to know how to compile the pfstat.
Many thanks in advance.
This is the same like the wiki.bsd-crew Howto (Dettus) from my initial
mail. I tried 3 different Howtos (including the depenguinator) and lots
of ideas i had, all with the same result: "Booting from Disk..." and
then nothing more. I'm quite sure that the kernel does not boot and some
posts i found
On 4/29/06, Aaron Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
p.s. the offer still stands for a trade, so far no takers )-:
pls... Try the freebsd mailing lists instead. :)
-jf
On 4/29/06, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't want to start holy war, but just out of curiosity.
compare OpenBSD's goals with the FreeBSD project's goals and you
should be able to understand why Theo said what he said.
aaron.glenn
p.s. the offer still stands for a trade, so far no take
2006/4/28, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wonder why http://www.openbsd.org/books.html still recommend old
> daemon book, The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating
> System?
> As most of you know, there's newer version, The Design and
> Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating
On 2006.04.29, at 4:43 PM, Greg Thomas wrote:
Wow, I guess we had to be there.
Something like that. With only a few sleeps to go, some people are
feeling silly for Puffy.
It seems that a little silliness helps to fight against the sad
seriousness of what OpenBSD is up against...
http:/
33 matches
Mail list logo
