Try to disable pcibios. On boot prompt, type:
boot bsd.mp -c
disable pcibios
quit
That might help.
On 5/14/06, Jakub G3azik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello misc,
I have a problem with booting the MP kernel, it just hangs during boot.
The server is an old big HP NetServer LH II with two P2 3
My brand new installation of 3.9 (GENERIC, no patches applied as
yet) is failing often with similar type messages:
- start -
uvm_fault(0xd05c2f60, 0xd0dfb000, 0, 3) -> euvm_fault(0xd05c2f60,
0xd0dfb000, 0, 3) -> e
kernel: page fault trap, code-0
Stopped at uvm_fault+0x28c: incl uvmexp+0xf4
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:04:29PM +0200, Wild Karl-Heinz wrote:
> hi.
>
> I'm working on a openbsd kernel and an image for
> an AMD Geode SC1200UHF-266.
>
> I got a cpu-module and the eval-board. The manufactor
> is kontor.
>
> I configured a kernel similar to my wrap-boxe
> and changed some en
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:53:36PM -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
> My apologies, for not noticing that faq entry. But is
> is not a solution in general.
>
> I had a menu entry for "emacs", The effect I got
> was the shell inside emacs didn't have ENV set,
> and by that time ksh is not going to look a
On 5/14/06, Tor Houghton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
List,
This may sound daft, but the man pages don't appear to mention it. I have a
box that sometime gives me a warning about fan RPM failure (or rather, the
RPM is low, so sensorsd logs that it is outside the limits).
Thing is, sysctl doesn't
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:38:40PM +0200, ip wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
> I spent two days to read man and how-tos, but today I don't succeed
> again to make raid 1 to work.
> I want to install openbsd 3.9 on two ide disks (wd0,wd1) of 10 gb with
> raidframe raid 1.
> Following the main steps that I h
Hello misc,
I have a problem with booting the MP kernel, it just hangs during boot.
The server is an old big HP NetServer LH II with two P2 300MHz
processors. It worked very good on Linux with SMP. It's running OpenBSD
since 3.7 and since then it doesn't boot with GENERIC.MP kernel. GENERIC
w
List,
This may sound daft, but the man pages don't appear to mention it. I have a
box that sometime gives me a warning about fan RPM failure (or rather, the
RPM is low, so sensorsd logs that it is outside the limits).
Thing is, sysctl doesn't show me a readout. E.g.
bash-3.00# sysctl hw.sensors.
* Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-14 20:15]:
> As I understand it, priq only affects things at all when a queue is
> exceeding its bandwidth limit. As long as a queue is below the limit, it
> does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Only when the limit is exceeded, priq drops
> packets instead of sen
Ah, you mean the following section in pf.conf(5)
bandwidth
Specifies the maximum bitrate to be processed by the queue. This
value must not exceed the value of the parent queue and can be
specified as an absolute value or a percentage of the parent
queue's b
* Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The man page dictates that priq doesn't do bandwidth shaping, yet to define
> a priq queue, you have to declare the bandwidth available. So which is it?
How does the man page dictate (or even imply) that priq doesn't use the
bandwidth parameter?
As I
Hi all,
In OpenBSD, what's the simplest driver source to read to have a good
idea of what's in a driver code (for some hardware device) ?
Best regards,
Bruno.
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:16:49AM -0700, Anon Y. Mous wrote:
> Is there a way I can use a third-party boot loader,
> e.g.,
> GRUB, LILO, or LOADLIN, to access the bsd.rd image for
> an
> install?
>
> The only other option I know of is TFTPD/DHCPD for the
> pxeboot image, since there this PC does
I want to install OBSD 3.9/i386 onto a Tosh. 420 CDT:
Pent. @ 100 MHz, 40 MB RAM, 2 MB VRAM, max. res.
1280x1024 @ 8-bit color depth, no ext. FDD module.
1.26 GB HDD.
Currently, Debian (Woody) Linux kernel 2.2 is
installed
onto this system. I have network access through an SMC
10/100 Ethernet PCM
I just installed 3.9. Got X up and running. I thought I would test out
the pkg_add -u so I set PKG_PATH variable, installed
mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.1.tgz and then proceeded to run pkg_add -u,
pkg_add checked all installed packages and nothing needing updating
though this page states differently (for
Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Melameth, Daniel D. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/05/06
> 20:06]:
> > It would seem altq wants a bandwidth declaration. However, from
> > man 5 pf.conf:
> >
> > If bandwidth is not specified, the interface bandwidth is used.
>
> And OpenBSD complains bitterly whe
Thus spake Jeff Quast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [14/05/06 08:12]:
: THINK about it.
I have. Which is why I'm confused on two points:
The man page dictates that priq doesn't do bandwidth shaping, yet to define
a priq queue, you have to declare the bandwidth available. So which is it?
When defining th
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:04:17PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
> cool-n-quiet patches. I'm very delighted by this! Thank you so much.
> My power consumption is down by 0.5 KW/h per day on average gathered and
> averaged in the last 6 days, compared to a power consumption average of
Oh.. uhm.. I
Hi,
For the past few days I've been running 3.9-current which have the AMD64
cool-n-quiet patches. I'm very delighted by this! Thank you so much.
My power consumption is down by 0.5 KW/h per day on average gathered and
averaged in the last 6 days, compared to a power consumption average of
3.5 K
On 5/13/06, Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As priq seems to be doing bandwidth throttling, does this not place an
artificial bandwidth restriction of 700Kb/s on my /inbound/ traffic as well
(which is something more in the order of a raw 3Mbps)?
You're making an ass of yourself.
THINK
Hi,
I have an ibook that has a broken ata controller and thus I boot and run the OS
off an USB stick. It ran fine for months on a 512 MB stick until 3.9 which
increased the size (I think of the libraries) of OpenBSD, I switched to a 1 gig
stick which surprisingly came down in cost the last little
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
Some reading notes for french readers :
Thanks!
It has been corrected in the translation CVS.
Just one thing if I may... Next time you should:
- send your message to www@
- send your changes as an unified diff ("diff -u")
Regards,
--
Antoine
Hi all,
Some reading notes for french readers :
* in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/fr/filter.html#intro :
chaque paquet est ivalui ` l'aune de toutes les rhgles avant qu'une
dicision finale ne soit prise.
should be (typing error) :
chaque paquet est ivalui ` l'aide de toutes les rhgles avant
23 matches
Mail list logo
