Re: How to track port updates in stable?

Will Maier wrote: On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:35:51PM -0500, Todd Pytel wrote: I don't spend as much time following OpenBSD as I used to, so perhaps I'm missing something. But there used to be a ports-security mailing list used for announcing updated ports. That list doesn't exist any more, or at

Re: Seeking info for RAID 1 on OpenBSD

On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Joel Knight wrote: > --- Quoting HDC on 2007/08/02 at 20:26 -0300: > > > Read this... > > http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/doc/raidadmin/ > .ca/openbsd/> > > > > I used to use raidframe and followed the procedures in that doc for > doing so, but

Re: spamd - 250 return text

I think that the problem is a bad mail program at your clients, A user should not see the 250 status, it is not a failure of any sort but I have seen it as a return status sent to a user. Here is an example that I have seen from someone who sent us a message. The message failed and this is the sta

Re: Seeking info for RAID 1 on OpenBSD

"L. V. Lammert" writes: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Joel Knight wrote: > > > --- Quoting HDC on 2007/08/02 at 20:26 -0300: > > > > > Read this... > > > http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/doc/raidadmin/ hief > > > .ca/openbsd/> > > > > > > > I used to use raidframe and followed

Re: Seeking info for RAID 1 on OpenBSD

On 7/28/07, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have two spare SATA drives on an OpenBSD 4.1 box and would like to set > up RAID level 1. > I'm a big fan of using the ROOTBACKUP=1 option in /etc/daily, and modifying it to also include /var and /usr . It is documented in the manpage for dail

Anchor File Consolidation

I keep my anchor rules in separate files and load them as needed, but I'd like to get away from this "anchor file sprawl." I understand I can move all these anchors into pf.conf inline, but doing so causes all of them to be loaded at startup and this doesn't meet my needs. Perhaps I'm missing

Re: Anchor File Consolidation

On 8/4/07, Daniel Melameth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I keep my anchor rules in separate files and load them as needed, but I'd > like to get away from this "anchor file sprawl." I understand I can move > all these anchors into pf.conf inline, but doing so causes all of them to be > loaded at st

Segmentation fault in sh script using base utilities only

Hi, I'm writing a set of small utilities as scripts, and I got a segmentation fault working on one of them. The script is suppoused to align text with spaces. Say you have this file: Foo1\tFoo2 Br\tBar2 Baz Where \t are horizontal tabs. My script would replace the tabs with an adequa

Re: ral in hostap mode

On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:56:18AM -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote: [ral PCI card performed poorly in hostap mode; packet loss etc] > Have you tried setting the channel and/or forcing the mode? I also > have a ral-based AP and while it performs fairly well, its reliability > and consistency

Re: Segmentation fault in sh script using base utilities only

On 8/4/07, Mic J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/4/07, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, I'm writing a set of small utilities as scripts, and I got a > > segmentation fault working on one of them. > > > > The script is suppoused to align text with spaces. Say you have this file: > > > > F

Re: Segmentation fault in sh script using base utilities only

well for completeness stdout wasnt changed either. but as you said, the script is in progress. michael

Re: iBGP: losing routes after eBGP flap

Hi Claudio, On Fri, 03.08.2007 at 20:57:43 +0200, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is more or less expected. iBGP session only transmit eBGP pathes that > are valid and best for the router. So on r2 you have all the iBGP routes > from r1 and r2 has no reason to send something back t

ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

In the process of upgrading a test machine from 3.9 -> 4.0 -> 4.1, something seems have to gotten farkled with ifconfig and/or network config. Can't find any clues in the upgrade docs. Is there something funky with 4.0 -> 4.1? Could file permissions have gotten off-track somewhere? Symptoms; =

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

At 04:11 PM 8/4/2007 -0500, you wrote: In the process of upgrading a test machine from 3.9 -> 4.0 -> 4.1, something seems have to gotten farkled with ifconfig and/or network config. Can't find any clues in the upgrade docs. Is there something funky with 4.0 -> 4.1? Could file permissions have g

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

On 2007/08/04 16:11, L. V. Lammert wrote: > (tried variations w/wo inet, subnet mask, no difference) > # ifconfig fxp0 inet alias 206.197.251.240 255.255.255.0 > (no errors returned) that's incorrect, see the ifconfig manual (format is not the same as hostname.if). > # ifconfig add -A to show al

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

At 10:40 PM 8/4/2007 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > # ifconfig add -A to show all aliases. Bingo - I must have missed that somehow!! Thanks!! Lee

carp: BACKUP machine receiving packets

am in the process of rotating in a backup firewall machine and when i bring up the backup machine's carp interface, there are packets being misdirected to it, even though it's interface is shown with state BACKUP. the peculiar thing about this is that if i use another machine (i386) besides the

Re: carp: BACKUP machine receiving packets

Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: ... if this is a known issue or can be fixed by a reboot/interface configuration on boot, do tell. disregard my previous post. hmmm, a reboot with hostname.if files set has fixed the issue... cheers, jake --

Re: ral in hostap mode

On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:50:59PM +0200, Jurjen Oskam wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:56:18AM -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote: > > [ral PCI card performed poorly in hostap mode; packet loss etc] > > Have you tried setting the channel and/or forcing the mode? I also > > have a ral-based AP

Re: dysfunctional carp

Hi Dag, > So if each system sees only its own carp traffic it makes sense that > each would consider themselves master. I assume that the systems can > send and receive tcp icmp, and udp traffic. Yes. I've turned pf off just in case. > Is it possible that the switch is not carrying multicast t