2008/10/24 disintx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henri Salo wrote:
> >
> > Hell no. http://fgeek.fi/lian-li/
> >
> Ah, I see. My bad. It looks like a Mac Pro from the side :)
> Beaut case.
>
>
Nice Kitty ;)
Henri Salo wrote:
>
> Hell no. http://fgeek.fi/lian-li/
>
Ah, I see. My bad. It looks like a Mac Pro from the side :)
Beaut case.
Dear:Misc
Do you need more targeted web traffic? We can help. Email us now at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] In your
reply, include your all your web addresses in your reply and how we can
contact you. We will give you
a free site review and show you why we are the best at getting you the most.
Sincerely,
Dear:Misc
If you're wondering why you're online business is not doing as well as you
would like - the answer is
web traffic. Basically - you need a lot more visibility. Email us today at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We will
take a look at your site and give you an assessment free of charge. It
doesn't ha
Dear:Misc
We can see you have a good site but you could use a significant increase in
targeted web traffic. We
can review your site for free and show you how you can improve this portion of
your online business
right away. Email us now at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include your web site and
how we ca
Hello all.
I'm trying to follow pfctl(8):
> -T load Load only the table definitions from pf.conf(5).
>This is used in conjunction with the -f flag, as
>in:
>
> # pfctl -Tl -f pf.conf
Console session (same result on another PC with older
Henri Salo wrote:
> http://hack.fi/~fgeek/fke_bsd.jpg <3
Mac Pro eh? :P
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/01/leberation_claims_mac_pros_emit_toxic_fumes/
Great picture by the way :)
http://hack.fi/~fgeek/fke_bsd.jpg <3
--
Henri Salo +358407705733
GPG ID: 2EA46E4F fp: 14D0 7803 BFF6 EFA0 9998 8C4B 5DFE A106 2EA4 6E4F
On 2008-10-24, Prabhu Gurumurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After applying the following patch, still no luck! I did a google
> search for "The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid", the links refer to
> freebsd and something WRT lenovo intel card, which is what you
> suggested in your email
>
> An
Thanks Otto and Sebastian.
"Otto Moerbeek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenBSD uses a pretty low default send and receive buffer size for
> sockets. Try increasing net.inet.tcp.recvspace and
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace, after reading a bit about bandwidth * delay
> products.
Sebastian Reitenbach w
On 16:46:18 Oct 24, Pierre Riteau wrote:
> Because the delay between the two machines is very low.
> It appears you need to read about bandwidth-delay product as well.
>
Actually it is quite a deep concept.
How TCP "guesses" the bandwidth is quite a challenge.
And often TCP gets it wrong.
I
Chris -
After applying the following patch, still no luck! I did a google
search for "The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid", the links refer to
freebsd and something WRT lenovo intel card, which is what you
suggested in your email
patch:
# pwd
/usr/src/sys/dev/pci
# cvs diff -u .
cvs server:
> -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Lars Noodin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gesendet: 24.10.08 17:34:03
> An: Sebastian Reitenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: slow network performance behind cisco
> Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> >> Von: "Otto Moerbeek" <[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:42:25PM +0300, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Aaron Stellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello misc@,
> > Compiled freshly checked out -current from 10/23/08 -- no sound.
> > Looked through mixerctl and audioctl outputs, didn't find anything
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Lars NoodC)n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice interview Damien Miller:
>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/21327/1090/1/0/
Wow, that was an excellent read. Thanks for posting it, Lars.
Hi.
I'm running 4.4-current (GENERIC.MP). When I power on the system
and boot, the dmesg shows a pretty high frequency for CPU0 (2562 MHz).
CPU1 shows what I would expect (2135 MHz).
If I reboot, the dmesg shows normal values again for both cores (see
results below). It seems to stay this way b
2008/10/24 Dan Harnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:57:54AM -0700, Aaron Stellman wrote:
>> Hello misc@,
>> Compiled freshly checked out -current from 10/23/08 -- no sound.
>> Looked through mixerctl and audioctl outputs, didn't find anything
>
I think I lost sound on my Asus10
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Aaron Stellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello misc@,
> Compiled freshly checked out -current from 10/23/08 -- no sound.
> Looked through mixerctl and audioctl outputs, didn't find anything
> interesting.
> Downgraded azalia_codec.c to 1.49
> azalia.h
Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>> Von: "Otto Moerbeek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> OpenBSD uses a pretty low default send and receive buffer size for
>> sockets. Try increasing net.inet.tcp.recvspace and
>> net.inet.tcp.sendspace, after reading a bit about bandwidth * delay
>> products.
> ... after a bit
Hi,
> -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Otto Moerbeek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gesendet: 24.10.08 13:11:39
> An: Sebastian Reitenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: slow network performance behind cisco
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:58:27PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenba
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 03:54:01PM +0200, Christoph Leser wrote:
>
> If it is a buffer size problem, why can he transmit 500mb/sec between bsd and
> local linux?
As Otto mentioned, read up on 'bandwidth delay product'. There's higher
network latency between the remote sites vs hosts on the local
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 03:54:01PM +0200, Christoph Leser wrote:
> > -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Im Auftrag von Otto Moerbeek
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 24. Oktober 2008 13:11
> > An: Sebastian Reitenbach
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > Betref
> -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Im Auftrag von Otto Moerbeek
> Gesendet: Freitag, 24. Oktober 2008 13:11
> An: Sebastian Reitenbach
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: slow network performance behind cisco
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:5
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 10/23/08, mak maxie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: mak maxie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.
>> To: misc@openbsd.org
>> Date: Thursday, October 23
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:54 AM, mak maxie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
You forgot to attach your patch to implement this "feature".
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:57:54AM -0700, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> Hello misc@,
> Compiled freshly checked out -current from 10/23/08 -- no sound.
> Looked through mixerctl and audioctl outputs, didn't find anything
> interesting.
> Downgraded azalia_codec.c to 1.49
>azalia.h to 1.15
>
Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Anyoneone on the list use an usb apple alu keyboard (the last one) ? I
> would like to use one on openbsd (french version of the keyboard) and
> would like to know if it could work.
I have a recent one right now. (model a1243) The keyboard works well
in the bootloader bu
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:58:27PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm experiencing a very bad network performance, when I try to connect
> to a remote server.
> The point-to-point connection is a E3 line, with 34MBit/s, with a cisco 2800
> router on each side, terminati
Hi all,
Anyoneone on the list use an usb apple alu keyboard (the last one) ? I
would like to use one on openbsd (french version of the keyboard) and
would like to know if it could work.
- benont
Hello everybody,
I'm experiencing a very bad network performance, when I try to connect
to a remote server.
The point-to-point connection is a E3 line, with 34MBit/s, with a cisco 2800
router on each side, terminating the point-to-point connection.
These cisco routers have two gigabit interfaces,
"sudo which slaptest" will tell you where in your PATH slaptest is. add that to
your root's PATH and it will work.
also, depending on you are invoking the root shell .profile might not be
executed at all.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:42:10AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 10/23/08, Almir Kar
Nice interview Damien Miller:
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/21327/1090/1/0/
-Lars
On 10/23/08, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> most likelly /usr/local/sbin is not in your root's PATH, do
> PATH="$PATH:/usr/local/sbin" as root and slaptest should be found.
Would you kindly demonstrate a foolproof root's ~/.profile, since I
wasn't able to figure the lines to do it perman
On 00:57 Fri 24 Oct, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> Hello misc@,
> Compiled freshly checked out -current from 10/23/08 -- no sound.
> Looked through mixerctl and audioctl outputs, didn't find anything
> interesting.
> Downgraded azalia_codec.c to 1.49
>azalia.h to 1.15
>azalia.c to
Hello misc@,
Compiled freshly checked out -current from 10/23/08 -- no sound.
Looked through mixerctl and audioctl outputs, didn't find anything
interesting.
Downgraded azalia_codec.c to 1.49
azalia.h to 1.15
azalia.c to 1.55
recompiled kernel -- sound works again.
If needed,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:29:52AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> mak maxie wrote:
> > http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
> >
> > Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
>
> Ah, so that's why Windows has proven so resistant to spyware
>
36 matches
Mail list logo
