Re: Why does OBSD advise to use packages if they are outdated?

2009-09-01 Thread Amarendra Godbole
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:39 AM, David Taveras wrote: > Hello community,Thanks for all the hard work for the developers and testers > out there, I have a confusion: > W > hy OBSD strongly advises to use packages over building an application from > ports (according to FAQ 15.4.6) if : > > a.) Obsd do

Seu acesso foi expirado

2009-09-01 Thread contato
Prezado Cliente, Seu acesso ao Bradesco Internet Banking foi expirado pelo sistema, devido a atualizacao de nossos Servidores. Informamos que para continuar o acesso sera necessario acessar o Link abaixo e validar seu cadastro. http://www.bradesco.com.br/atualizacao2009 Ou entre em contato cono

Re: OT rack mount monitor/keyboards

2009-09-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-09-01, Bryan wrote: >>On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 13:56, stan wrote: >> I have a few locations where I have installed 1U rack mount >> KVM/monitor/keyboards, and quite frankly. I'm not happy with any of the >> ones I have tried. >> >> I recognize this is off topic, but the people on this list a

Re: OT rack mount monitor/keyboards

2009-09-01 Thread Aaron Mason
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Bryan wrote: >>On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 13:56, stan wrote: >> I have a few locations where I have installed 1U rack mount >> KVM/monitor/keyboards, and quite frankly. I'm not happy with any of the >> ones I have tried. >> >> I recognize this is off topic, but the peopl

Lujo en equilibrio con los espacios...

2009-09-01 Thread Armoni House
Title:::Armoni House:: Si no puede ver este anuncio, haga click aqum Todos los departamentos cuentan con altura libre de 3m. ::Armoni House:: Si no desea recibir mas promociones o informacisn, remuivase aqum.

Re: OT rack mount monitor/keyboards

2009-09-01 Thread Bryan
>On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 13:56, stan wrote: > I have a few locations where I have installed 1U rack mount > KVM/monitor/keyboards, and quite frankly. I'm not happy with any of the > ones I have tried. > > I recognize this is off topic, but the people on this list are pretty hard > to please. Given t

Re: pf changes

2009-09-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-09-01, Henning Brauer wrote: > * J.C. Roberts [2009-09-01 20:00]: >> Henning and all, Fantastic Work! > > 10x > >> One question, is this in snaps now? >> Or should I wait a few days for new snaps? > > snapshots for the vax take a while. > > honestly, it'll be in snapshots for the fast arc

OT rack mount monitor/keyboards

2009-09-01 Thread stan
I have a few locations where I have installed 1U rack mount KVM/monitor/keyboards, and quite frankly. I'm not happy with any of the ones I have tried. I recognize this is off topic, but the people on this list are pretty hard to please. Given that I was wondering if anyone would like to recomend a

Re: pf changes

2009-09-01 Thread Henning Brauer
* J.C. Roberts [2009-09-01 20:00]: > Henning and all, Fantastic Work! 10x > One question, is this in snaps now? > Or should I wait a few days for new snaps? snapshots for the vax take a while. honestly, it'll be in snapshots for the fast archs sooner and in those for the slower archs a bit lat

Re: pf changes

2009-09-01 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:12:37 +0200 Henning Brauer wrote: > I have just committed a monster pf diff that is basically a rewrite of > the entire NAT part. > > seperate rules for nat, rdr etc are gone. > > nat and rdr become actions on regular rules. > > simple rulesets are converted like this: >

Re: verifying ntp status?

2009-09-01 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:06:41PM -0400, stan wrote: > ON mainstream ntp, you can run "ntpq -p" to obatin the "status", that is > what peers it is atached to, etc. I realize that the OpenBSD version has > beenrewriten to enhance security, and I am thankfull for that. > > But, is there a way that

Re: verifying ntp status?

2009-09-01 Thread Chris Kuethe
look in /var/log/daemon On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:06 AM, stan wrote: > ON mainstream ntp, you can run "ntpq -p" to obatin the "status", that is > what peers it is atached to, etc. I realize that the OpenBSD version has > beenrewriten to enhance security, and I am thankfull for that. > > But, is th

verifying ntp status?

2009-09-01 Thread stan
ON mainstream ntp, you can run "ntpq -p" to obatin the "status", that is what peers it is atached to, etc. I realize that the OpenBSD version has beenrewriten to enhance security, and I am thankfull for that. But, is there a way that i can confirm the working status of the OpenBSD version? -- O

Re: "no-df" option for pf reassembly is backwards?

2009-09-01 Thread Joel Sing
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > According to pf.conf: > > If no-df is given, fragments with the dont-fragment bit set have > it cleared before entering the fragment cache, and thus the > reassembled packet doesn't have dont-fragment set either. > > But from reading

Re: pf changes

2009-09-01 Thread Eugene Yunak
2009/9/1 Henning Brauer : > > > and now it is your time. test this as much as you can, to avoid > surprises in 4.7, and bugs showing up after release... we really want > to find them beforehands, right? Thanks a lot, guys! I'll deploy it to production tommorow. -- The best the little guy can d

reply-to

2009-09-01 Thread dark knight neo
Hello there, I have the following situation: 2 computers comp 1 -> wan = 200.xx.xx.xx.2 lan = 192.168.0.2 comp 2 -> wan = 192.168.2.1 lan 192.168.168.0.1 / webserver running on port 443 i can connect to webserver via comp1 in this form rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from xxx to port 443 -> 192

pf changes

2009-09-01 Thread Henning Brauer
I have just committed a monster pf diff that is basically a rewrite of the entire NAT part. seperate rules for nat, rdr etc are gone. nat and rdr become actions on regular rules. simple rulesets are converted like this: nat on $ext_if to ($ext_if) becomes match out on $ext-if nat-to ($ext_i

nat-t dropping response packets

2009-09-01 Thread n0g0013
not sure where to start debugging this VPN problem. i have an ipsec, nat-t tunnel between a development network and the main services hub using isakmpd. the exchange seems to go smoothly and the tunnel gets established. hub(public_ip) --> {inet} <-- ext-gw(nat-ip) <-- dev-gw(private_ip)

ORUÇ BOZMAYAN AĞRI KESİCİ!...

2009-09-01 Thread Gondolda.com
[IMAGE] Bu e-posta size BultenYonetim.com'dan onaylı olarak gvnderilmiştir. B|ltenYonetim'den e-posta almak istemiyorsanız des...@bultenyonetim.com 'a boş bir mail gvnderebilirsiniz. Rahatsizlik verdigimiz igin vz|r dileriz. gondolda.com ORUG BOZMAYAN APRI KES]C] Marka : Pain-Gone Piyasa

Re: Kernel memory usage

2009-09-01 Thread João Salvatti
Thanks Ted. 2009/9/1 Ted Unangst : > 2009/8/31 JoC#o Salvatti : >> Anyone know how to show the amount of memory my kernel (4.5) is using? > > vmstat -m > -- B;(b) OpenBSD Free, Functional & Secure. -- JoC#o Salvatti Graduated in Computer Science Federal University of Para - UFPA - Brazil E-M

Check out my photos on Facebook

2009-09-01 Thread Tom Monte
Hi m...@cvs.openbsd.org, I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile. Thanks, Tom To sign up for Facebook, follow the link be