On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 15:30:28 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
status = tcsetattr(fd, TCSANOW, options);
How does it behave if you use TCSAFLUSH rather than TCSANOW ?
I made that substitution and added a
#define DEBUG 1
The resulting binary sometimes fails to return and I then have to
hit
Hi,
I'm new to openbsd. Sorry if the question is obvious to you but I couldn't find
the answer in the docs. So here it is:
what is the reason why the install suggests so many different partitions? Why
not simply / and /home for example?
Thanks.
Cantabile
On May 02 10:03:21, Cantabile wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to openbsd. Sorry if the question is obvious to you but I couldn't
find the answer in the docs. So here it is:
what is the reason why the install suggests so many different partitions? Why
not simply / and /home for example?
Don't just
Cantabile cantabile...@wanadoo.fr writes:
I'm new to openbsd. Sorry if the question is obvious to you but I
couldn't find the answer in the docs. So here it is: what is the
reason why the install suggests so many different partitions? Why
not simply / and /home for example?
you actually will
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Neil O'Brien nsob...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 15:30:28 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
status = tcsetattr(fd, TCSANOW, options);
How does it behave if you use TCSAFLUSH rather than TCSANOW ?
I made that substitution and added a
#define
On Sat, 1 May 2010 14:11:22 +0200 Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,
the following piece of code compiles fine using g++ 4.2.4, but
fails using g++ 3.3.5 in the base system:
error: operands to ?: have different types
On 05/02/10 05:23, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Cantabilecantabile...@wanadoo.fr writes:
I'm new to openbsd. Sorry if the question is obvious to you but I
couldn't find the answer in the docs. So here it is: what is the
reason why the install suggests so many different partitions? Why
not
Thanks, everybody!
Cantabile
Le dimanche 02 mai 2010 C 10:03 +0200, Cantabile a C)crit :
Hi,
I'm new to openbsd. Sorry if the question is obvious to you but I couldn't
find the answer in the docs. So here it is:
what is the reason why the install suggests so many different partitions? Why
Nous avons la Parole de Dieu: Le site Nous avons la Parole de Dieu vous
souhaite la bienvenue !
Venez me joindre sur Nous avons la Parole de Dieu!
Antoinette Gurrieri
Cliquez sur le lien ci-dessous pour vous joindre C un rC)seauB :
Hi.
OpenBSD's stock httpd is very slow and outdated. It is about 6 years old.
Almost an abandonware.
Is it that impossible to see OpenBSD coming with (chroot'ed) Apache 2.2.x by
the default?
That would be great!
The license problem would be solved by discussing it with the Apache
community,
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 20:56:36 +1000, Aaron Mason wrote:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Neil O'Brien nsob...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 15:30:28 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
status = tcsetattr(fd, TCSANOW, options);
How does it behave if you use TCSAFLUSH rather
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Dexter Tomisson dexterto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
OpenBSD's stock httpd is very slow and outdated. It is about 6 years old.
No, it's not. Stop spreading lies.
--
chs
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 06:31:22PM +0300, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
Hi.
OpenBSD's stock httpd is very slow and outdated. It is about 6 years old.
Almost an abandonware.
Is it that impossible to see OpenBSD coming with (chroot'ed) Apache 2.2.x by
the default?
No, and by reading your email you
Hi,
the manpage for the dc Ethernetcard isn't on my system and in the online
manpages. I have 4.6 stable installed und man 4 dc isn't found. The
website shows only the manpage for man 1 dc (desktop calculator) and not
man 4 dc. But the list on this site shows a dc manpage for section 4:
On May 02 18:31:22, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
Hi.
OpenBSD's stock httpd is very slow and outdated. It is about 6 years old.
Almost an abandonware.
Is it that impossible to see OpenBSD coming with (chroot'ed) Apache 2.2.x by
the default?
That would be great!
The license problem would be
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 05:53:56PM +0200, Rene Maroufi wrote:
Hi,
the manpage for the dc Ethernetcard isn't on my system and in the online
manpages. I have 4.6 stable installed und man 4 dc isn't found. The
website shows only the manpage for man 1 dc (desktop calculator) and not
man 4 dc.
On Sun, 2 May 2010 16:45:44 +0100 Neil O'Brien
nsob...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 20:56:36 +1000, Aaron Mason wrote:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Neil O'Brien
nsob...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 15:30:28 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
status =
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Christopher Zimmermann
madro...@zakweb.de wrote:
On Sat, 1 May 2010 14:11:22 +0200 Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,
the following piece of code compiles fine using g++ 4.2.4, but
fails using g++
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 12:54:42PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Christopher Zimmermann
madro...@zakweb.de wrote:
On Sat, 1 May 2010 14:11:22 +0200 Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,
the
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 08:51:05PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
I don't know what you did to your system, but I've checked a 4.6
system and a current system, and both have the dc(4) man page.
OK, sorry, after a sh /etc/weekly the manpage is shown. It was on my
system, but makewhatis was not up
ok, thanks everyone. Problem is solved and I even learned some things, too.
Christopher
Can anyone post a howto/doc, help about booting a Debian on a
RouterStation Pro?:\
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=108415#p108415
I still didn't manage to boot from it.
Or any other normal distro :\
Thank you..
p.s.: a little more detailed howto:\
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 15:26, Jozsi Vadkan jozsi.avad...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone post a howto/doc, help about booting a Debian on a
RouterStation Pro?:\
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=108415#p108415
I still didn't manage to boot from it.
Or any other normal distro :\
On Sun, 2 May 2010 12:01:59 -0700 J.C. Roberts
list-...@designtools.org wrote:
The other problem is understanding what is happening. Unless you
specifically configured the descriptor to return immediately, your
read(2) call will sleep until it gets the requested number of bytes
from the
OpenBSD's stock httpd is very slow and outdated. It is about 6 years old.
Almost an abandonware.
I will print this mail and laugh everyday with it. :)
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
Hey, at least throw in that
/dev/sd0g on /usr/X11R6 type ffs (local, nodev)
/dev/sd0h on /usr/local type ffs (local, nodev)
/dev/sd0j on /usr/obj type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid)
/dev/sd0i on /usr/src type ffs
On 05/02/10 20:26, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
Hey, at least throw in that
/dev/sd0g on /usr/X11R6 type ffs (local, nodev)
/dev/sd0h on /usr/local type ffs (local, nodev)
/dev/sd0j on /usr/obj type ffs (local,
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
Well, /usr/ports is updated, but never needs to be erased unless really
messed up by user error
That's true of /usr/src too though, right?
Hi Guys,
Reading some archives, I found people saying that OpenBSD has no disk
scheduler. My first question is: is this true? If so, what is the reason? Is
it technical or there are no resources for this?
Thanks in advance,
Luis.
Are you able to read? At least this
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#Included and snippet from it :
# Our improved and secured version of the Apache 1.3 web server. The
OpenBSD team has added default chrooting, privilege revocation, and
other security-related improvements. Also includes
30 matches
Mail list logo
