Re: audio recording levels

2010-06-13 Thread Jan Stary
On Jun 14 11:37:52, Paul M wrote: > I have a large amount of analog audio I need to digitize and > naturaly want to ensure best transfer quality. So I need to set > the analog level at the input to the adc as high as possible > without clipping. It is good practice to leave a little headroom (say,

OpenBSD sends RSTs for gratuitous traffic

2010-06-13 Thread Patrick Coleman
Hi, I've got an interesting problem that I'd really appreciate some input on. I am in the process of migrating our Linux router-on-a-stick to an OpenBSD router, and have configured an OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) box with an IP on each VLAN. At present, no devices are configured to use the OpenBSD box as

Re: audio recording levels

2010-06-13 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:03:38AM +0200, Martin Pelik?n wrote: > Hi, > this you might already know, but good rule of thumb is to set the > levels manually for each source (according to its dynamics), having > peaks around -6dB to -10dB. If you have manual volume/gain control on > your recording de

Re: audio recording levels

2010-06-13 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:37:52AM +1200, Paul M wrote: > I have a large amount of analog audio I need to digitize and > naturaly want to ensure best transfer quality. So I need to set > the analog level at the input to the adc as high as possible > without clipping. Ideally, I'll get the workstati

Re: audio recording levels

2010-06-13 Thread Martin Pelikán
Hi, this you might already know, but good rule of thumb is to set the levels manually for each source (according to its dynamics), having peaks around -6dB to -10dB. If you have manual volume/gain control on your recording device/preamp, I'd set all levels in the computer to 80% of the scale and th

hope

2010-06-13 Thread hope
hh Never lose hope in Allah!

audio recording levels

2010-06-13 Thread Paul M
I have a large amount of analog audio I need to digitize and naturaly want to ensure best transfer quality. So I need to set the analog level at the input to the adc as high as possible without clipping. Ideally, I'll get the workstation hardware set to certin defaults, then adjust the incomming a

Re: dspam administration question.

2010-06-13 Thread Devin Ceartas
I use dedicated email addresses (spam@, tofu@). My understanding is there are many possibilities. I have not worked on web interface, but there may be a way to use a network type interface (as opposed to sockets)? Devin Ceartas Owner, NacreData L.L.C. PO Box 646 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (919)

dspam administration question.

2010-06-13 Thread Kevin
Hello misc@ I have up and running dspam. All seems are working as expected. My question is.. Since I'm running httpd chroot()ed, still exists a solution to perform spam classication? I tryied dspam-phpcontrolcenter but seems to be hard to integrate with apache. Thks a lot

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-13 Thread E.T
Sorry, my english is very bad ... On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:47:08 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:08:28 +0200 > "E.T" wrote: > >> Hence the question of having a powerful processor? >> >> One Debian turns with a facility has gnC)nC)rique 800mhz, good work. >> Processor mult-

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:08:28 +0200 "E.T" wrote: > Hence the question of having a powerful processor? > > One Debian turns with a facility has gnC)nC)rique 800mhz, good work. > Processor mult-core 3.00ghz not utility for firewall and desktop. > > > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:44:37 +0100, Kevin Chad

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-13 Thread E.T
Hence the question of having a powerful processor? One Debian turns with a facility has gnC)nC)rique 800mhz, good work. Processor mult-core 3.00ghz not utility for firewall and desktop. On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:44:37 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: >> I can also show you PIII systems that draw more

Urgente! Central do Auto-Atendimento BB.

2010-06-13 Thread gerente074
BANCO DO BRASIL Prezado(a) Cliente. O Banco do Brasil traz para sua maior Seguranga o Sistema adesco de Seguranga da Central do Auto-Atendimento BB: O BB esta fornecendo adesco a senha da Central do Auto-Atendimento de (4 Dmgitos). A partir de 20/06/2010 todas as transagues sera obrigatsrio usar

Caraíbas * Baleares & Canárias * Cabo Verde

2010-06-13 Thread parede
Almeida Viagens - Parede - Telefone..: 214 018 075Se nco conseguir visualizar este mail em condigues siga este "Link" www.parede.almeidaweb.com par...@almeidaviagens.com Reservas Online Almeida Viagens - Parede Reserve Hotiis em todo o Mundo Destinos Tropicai

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> I can also show you PIII systems that draw more than 300W, and I > discarded one a while ago that probably could have maxed out at well > over 500w. > I was shocked to find my nforce board draws around 130 watts, when it's switched OFF!!! and with the new graphics card can push upto 700 wat

Re: Huawei E1750

2010-06-13 Thread David Zeillinger
Hello, the modechange flag needs to be DEV_UMASS5. Works great now. Index: umsm.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/umsm.c,v retrieving revision 1.63 diff -u -r1.63 umsm.c --- umsm.c 20 May 2010 11:31:34 - 1.63 +++ ums

Re: Bug in www manual pages

2010-06-13 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Tomas, > if you will visit http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi and want to > read some of intro(x) pages, then all lead to intro(1). But you can > see above, that section was changed correctly. But if you will enter > intro to Man Page or Keyword Search: and choose eg. section 9, then > afte

Re: Bug in www manual pages

2010-06-13 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Hi, thx for info and no problem. I was not 100% sure about this so I didn't know if it's same problem or something new. Sorry for noise On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Tomas, > >> if you will visit http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi and want to >> read some of int

Re: ucom(4)

2010-06-13 Thread Gregory Edigarov
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:33:03 +0100 FRLinux wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Gregory Edigarov > wrote: > > trying to set different speeds on the port doesn't help me either. > > Have you tried with screen directly ? screen /dev/xxx not working either. > Also i'd give it a go with and

Re: ucom(4)

2010-06-13 Thread Gregory Edigarov
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:46:40 +0200 Floor Terra wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Gregory Edigarov > wrote: > > Hello, > > > however, when I try to connect to any device via the cable, and then > > access to it using cu -l /dev/cuaU0, it behaves strangely: > > I could see the device rece

Re: ucom(4)

2010-06-13 Thread Floor Terra
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Hello, > however, when I try to connect to any device via the cable, and then > access to it using cu -l /dev/cuaU0, it behaves strangely: > I could see the device receiving B what I type, but I cannot see any > response from the device.

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-13 Thread Nick Holland
On 06/12/10 04:53, E.T wrote: >> * Nick [2010-06-11 12:55]: >>> If you want low power consumption and low cost, I'd suggest a small >>> PIII or Celeron based system, hard to beat for the price (usually, >>> free!). IF the new, cool stuff has any real power savings, you are >>> unlikely to ever re

Re: ucom(4)

2010-06-13 Thread FRLinux
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > trying to set different speeds on the port doesn't help me either. Have you tried with screen directly ? screen /dev/xxx Also i'd give it a go with and without parity (look at the man page) Cheers, Steph

Bug in www manual pages

2010-06-13 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Hi, if you will visit http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi and want to read some of intro(x) pages, then all lead to intro(1). But you can see above, that section was changed correctly. But if you will enter intro to Man Page or Keyword Search: and choose eg. section 9, then after Sumbit it will

Re: apm(8) life estimate error?

2010-06-13 Thread Marco Peereboom
I am not sure how inaccurate it is though. Battery estimates are what, +/- 100%? (minus really!) But nonetheless it appears like a bug. On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:52:12PM +, Jona Joachim wrote: > Let's compare the outputs of apm and sysctl: > > spaceman% apm && sysctl hw.sensors.acpibat0 >

Re: ucom(4)

2010-06-13 Thread Gregory Edigarov
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:39:00 +0300 Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Hello, > > Today I've bought myself Viewcon USB-to-RS232c adapter cable. > Under OpenBSD it is identifies as: > > uplcom0 at uhub1 port 6 "Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial > Controller" rev 1.10/3.00 addr 3 > > however, when I try

ucom(4)

2010-06-13 Thread Gregory Edigarov
Hello, Today I've bought myself Viewcon USB-to-RS232c adapter cable. Under OpenBSD it is identifies as: uplcom0 at uhub1 port 6 "Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller" rev 1.10/3.00 addr 3 however, when I try to connect to any device via the cable, and then access to it using cu -l /dev

Agenda PEH - Florais Golfinhos - Golfinhos Tour

2010-06-13 Thread Instituto Ser Pleno
Agenda Abril a Agosto de 2010 1 - Projeto da Emancipagco da Humanidade: Cursos de orientagco pessoal e do terapeuta do PEH "Com Amor se faz, com amor se constrsi" 3a. turma para preparagco de Terapeutas para atuarem com o PEH, O PEH trabalha libertando a conscijncia dos grilhues qu

Re: No SMP without acpi?

2010-06-13 Thread TimH
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:56:14 +0200 Tomas Bodzar wrote: > He said that you need to send it to him and to misc@ ;-) Attachments > are not allowed on m...@. Yeah, I realized I was being stupid the second I hit send... I apologize. --TimH

Re: No SMP without acpi?

2010-06-13 Thread Tomas Bodzar
He said that you need to send it to him and to misc@ ;-) Attachments are not allowed on m...@. On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:55 AM, TimH wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:45:51 -0500 > Marco Peereboom wrote: > >> something in the gpe handler screwing up. B please tar up the output of >> acpidump -o hp