Sacha El Masry writes:
> fatal: dns: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
> lost child: lookup agent exited abnormally
> fatal: dns_dispatch_parent: msgbuf_write: Broken pipe
> fatal: dns_dispatch_parent: msgbuf_write: Broken pipe
These messages make me wonder if you have a problem with RLIMIT_
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:56:57PM -0700, James Peltier wrote:
> Also, perhaps there will be a performance hit in the evaluation of all the
> queues that might be more hindering than helpful?
With an E1?
Even if you lose a little bit of throughput (which I doubt, if you are
running hardware tha
Gilles (or anybody),
I've been using smtpd since 4.6-RELEASE, for one domain-several email
addresses, plus one constantly receiving mailing list emails (including
misc@). It's been great.
Problem is, I've just set up smtpd on 4.7-RELEASE, using a very simple
ruleset, with the aim of using this as
NT360 SANAL TUR
===
TanD1tD1mlarD1nD1zda farklD1lD1k yaratacak, rakiplerinize karE D1 sizi
bir adD1m daha C6ne taE D1yacak, ucuz, zahmetsiz ve kaliteli bir
tanD1tD1m yC6ntemi olarak size NT360 SANAL TUR`u C6neriyoruz.
AC'D1k veya kapalD1 mekan tanD1tD1mlarD1nD1z iC'in ilk noktada sade
- Original Message
> From: Hermes Ojeda Ruiz
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 7, 2010 1:38:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Distribute bandwidth by IP's
>
> Yes, It's a little complex but is a requirement to guarantee a little
> bandwidth to the user. (and of course use the remaining
> I think the number 1 question I have about IPv6 is:
> What is wrong with arp?
Nothing is wrong with arp.
As a result of avoiding arp, IPv6 is a duck sitting in a tailing
pond. It isn't dead yet.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:23:19AM +0200, Martin Pelikan wrote:
> 2010/9/6, Claudio Jeker :
> > Only if you plan to use NAT in the near future. /64 is like a /32 in IP.
> > Not enough in most cases.
>
> Why? You can always use DHCPv6 and split the rank further... I haven't
> much studied the proto
Yes, It's a little complex but is a requirement to guarantee a little
bandwidth to the user. (and of course use the remaining unused bandwidth).
There is another way?
Thanks for the reply
On 07/09/10 15:14, James Peltier wrote:
- Original Message
From: Hermes Ojeda Ruiz
To: mis
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:34:45 -0500
Hermes Ojeda Ruiz wrote:
> On 07/09/10 13:21, roberth wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:15:03 -0500
> > Hermes Ojeda Ruiz wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi, Maybe this is a basic question, but I've read the man pages and
> >> the PF book and I don't know how solve thi
- Original Message
> From: Hermes Ojeda Ruiz
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 7, 2010 12:09:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Distribute bandwidth by IP's
>
> Sorry, if my explanation don't have enough details.
>
> - The internet connection is an E1
> - There are ~150 users (IPs)
> -
:) ok, that was my last option. I was looking a more "elegant" solution,
may be using tables or something like that. But if there is no choice,
I'll do that.
Thanks for your reply
On 07/09/10 13:56, roberth wrote:
your config
Sorry, if my explanation don't have enough details.
- The internet connection is an E1
- There are ~150 users (IPs)
- The company give full internet access to the clients. With no service
restriction.
- There only a C class LAN.
E1 --- OpenBSD Firewall --- LAN with ~150 IPs
The problem is to
On 07/09/10 13:21, roberth wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:15:03 -0500
Hermes Ojeda Ruiz wrote:
Hi, Maybe this is a basic question, but I've read the man pages and
the PF book and I don't know how solve this problem.
- I have an E1 and the problem is how to distribute the bandwidth
equally
Hi, Maybe this is a basic question, but I've read the man pages and the
PF book and I don't know how solve this problem.
- I have an E1 and the problem is how to distribute the bandwidth
equally on all the ip's. There are some constraints like use DHCP, and
no block ports. The company provide
Dear list,
I found impossible to have a carp interface in rdomain environment on
both the stable and current distributions.
Inserting this configuration:
ifconfig em0 up
ifconfig vlan101 172.26.196.2 netmask 255.255.255.248 vlan 101 vlandev
em0 rdomain 101
ifconfig carp101 vhid 1 pass testpw c
On Aug 30, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> why don't you look at the real interfaces instead of speculating.
>
> pflog is a bit messy, but that's another story hopefully solved soon.
>
> --
> Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
> BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
> Full-Serv
[IMAGE]
Editorial Pila Teleqa
Estimado compaqer@ de Educacisn Fmsica,
===
Permmteme unos minutos para presentarte un libro de texto para tus
alumnos.
Fundamentos Tesricos de la Educacisn Fmsica
He aqum un botsn como ejemplo, el mndice:
Bloque 1: condicisn fm
[IMAGE]
ΧÏηÏÏη ÏÎ±Ï ÎµÎ¹Î½Î±Î¹ κλειδÏμενο
Î ÏοÏεξαμε οÏι ανÏιμεÏÏÏiÏαÏε ÏÏοβλημαÏα
ÏÏ
νδ εÏÎ·Ï ÏÏο winbank.
ÎεÏα αÏο ÏÏÎµÎ¹Ï Î±Î½ÎµÏιÏÏ
ÏεiÏ ÏÏ
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:26:09PM -0700, James Peltier wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Now that I have my new bridge in place and happily filtering away I would
> like
> to look at monitoring and graphing it. I'd like to setup a "monitor port"
> style
> so that I can send the traffic over to another bo
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:26:09PM -0700, James Peltier wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Now that I have my new bridge in place and happily filtering away I would
> like
> to look at monitoring and graphing it. I'd like to setup a "monitor port"
> style
> so that I can send the traffic over to another bo
2010/9/6, Claudio Jeker :
> Only if you plan to use NAT in the near future. /64 is like a /32 in IP.
> Not enough in most cases.
Why? You can always use DHCPv6 and split the rank further... I haven't
much studied the protocol itself, but in practice the only system that
has trouble with it is Linu
cat /var/run/dmesg.boot
> A friend of mine has old Asus A3F and I have found a very
interesting
> bug in dmesg. When I type dmesg I don't get regular dmesg output.
It
> starts in the middle of regular dmesg output and then it prints
it 2
> more times.
[IMAGE]
!Promociones Especiales para Actualizar a todo su personal!
Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento.
O bien comunmquense a nuestros
23 matches
Mail list logo
