On 2011-04-09, James Chase ja...@chasecomputers.net wrote:
I have two OpenBSD 4.7 firewalls. I have tried to take them down to the
most basic configuration possible in my pf.conf ruleset while still passing
carp and state rule as suggested in the OpenBSD FAQ/Guide, however when I
reboot the
On 2011-04-09, Paul Suh paul@ps-enable.com wrote:
Folks,
I've been looking at the pf FAQ and there are instructions for symmetric load
balancing for outgoing traffic. Is there a way to do *asymmetric* load
balancing? E.g., I have a 20 Mbps FIOS line and a 6 Mbps ADSL line. I'd like
to
Try to use dd with dev/zero on wd0d and wd1d it was successed. But
bioctl return same error invalid metadata format.
10.04.2011 04:30, Marco Peereboom P?P8QP5Q:
There is some garbage in the location where softraid looks for metadata.
I got recently inspired to look at this because it looks
On Nov 08 00:54:29, Joel Sing wrote:
For a user's perspective you want to look at the -current man pages for
fstab(5), disklabel(8) and mount(8).
I finally got around to it. Thank you very much for diskmap,
I am using it everywhere I can now.
While editing my fstabs, I noticed that some disks
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 01:54:41PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
On Nov 08 00:54:29, Joel Sing wrote:
For a user's perspective you want to look at the -current man pages for
fstab(5), disklabel(8) and mount(8).
I finally got around to it. Thank you very much for diskmap,
I am using it
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:20 AM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Try to use dd with dev/zero on wd0d and wd1d it was successed. But bioctl
return same error invalid metadata format.
Make sure you have enough devices.
# cd dev
# sh MAKEDEV sd1
# sh MAKEDEV sd2
# sh MAKEDEV sd3
Make sure you are
Are there considerations to push the very few changes marked as 'Security
Fixes'
into the 'Release' branch between releases?
So that a 'Release' user could do a pgk_add -u fixed.tgz to get the fixed
version
of the package.
This would benefit users who like to have the 2 or 3 'Security Fixes'
Dear Mailbox,
The project does not have enough hands to handle this. We are
very much looking forward to your patches to help fix this problem.
kthnxbye,
Marco's Mailbox
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:46:14PM +, mailbox wrote:
Are there considerations to push the very few changes
Running the latest snap of amd64 and I'm noticing the machine has an idle
interrupt load of around 10%, where previously it idled at 0-1%. Prior to
the latest update the machine was running the March 20th snap.
In top the load shows as ~40% interrupt on CPU0, but the systat vmstat
output doesn't
On Sun, April 10, 2011 4:18 pm, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
There was an issue with azalia in a recent snapshot that looks like is
affecting you. I believe it was reverted or fixed so you can try building
a
new kernel or wait for a new snapshot.
Thanks, I'll build a new kernel momentarily and
Thanks Ted. All works fine now. May I use softraid 0+1 (raid10) discipline ?
There was an issue with azalia in a recent snapshot that looks like is
affecting you. I believe it was reverted or fixed so you can try building a
new kernel or wait for a new snapshot.
On Apr 10, 2011 12:47 PM, Joe Gidi j...@entropicblur.com wrote:
Running the latest snap of amd64 and I'm
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Joe Gidi j...@entropicblur.com wrote:
Running the latest snap of amd64 and I'm noticing the machine has an idle
interrupt load of around 10%, where previously it idled at 0-1%. Prior to
the latest update the machine was running the March 20th snap.
Probably
On Sun, April 10, 2011 4:18 pm, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
There was an issue with azalia in a recent snapshot that looks like is
affecting you. I believe it was reverted or fixed so you can try building
a
new kernel or wait for a new snapshot.
Built a fresh kernel and the high interrupt load is
B?Vacaciones en Cozumel?
Disfruta Cozumel sobre ruedas
Snorkel y Buceo
Tel: 987-8713105
Cel: 987-8739524
Nextel: (81)1506-8658
ID: 62 * 189692 * 5
hi there,
my new dmesg puzzles me in 2 ways:
--- dmesg.boot.2011-04-02 Sat Apr 2 17:57:35 2011
+++ dmesg.boot.2011-04-11 Mon Apr 11 01:11:59 2011
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #814: Wed Mar 23 13:00:06 MDT 2011
+OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #12: Sat Apr 9
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:29:49 +0200
frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
my new dmesg puzzles me in 2 ways:
1. how can be the kernel # smaller of a later kernel,
if these are both 4.9-current?
# rm -rf /usr/src/sys/arch/compile/GENERIC*
do that every time, so what? :)
2. what is the
2011/4/11, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org:
1. how can be the kernel # smaller of a later kernel,
if these are both 4.9-current?
It just means that compilation directory was wiped.
2. what is the extra hard disk information?
Disk's serial number it is.
--
Alexander Polakov | plhk.ru
18 matches
Mail list logo
