Well my solution was to switch from OpenBSD to Debian.
Drastic maybe, but at least it actually works since then.
I'm still trying to figure out why it happened thou, but no success so far.
On 2011-07-29 00:14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Whatever this is (and I don't have the slightest clue what
Hi,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldKernel has a section
"Variation on above process: Read-only source tree", which talks about
building a kernel outside src/. Interestingly, when I do a GENERIC.MP
build, by following these steps, the name displayed via config is that
of the directory in w
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
Hi,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldKernel has a section
"Variation on above process: Read-only source tree", which talks about
building a kernel outside src/. Interestingly, when I do a GENERIC.MP
build, by following these steps, the name d
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:43:52AM +0200, David Vasek wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldKernel has a section
> >"Variation on above process: Read-only source tree", which talks about
> >building a kernel outside src/. Int
hi there,
sorry for the offtopic but there are probably many knowledgeable
admins on this list as well.
i am looking for a solution that keeps monitoring file system io
for all stuff under a certain path and whenever files
change/get added/removed it synchronises these changes with
multiple remot
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:43:52AM +0200, David Vasek wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
Hi,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldKernel has a section
"Variation on above process: Read-only source tree", which talks about
buildi
A new day and a new suspend/resume cycle: my laptop has a high interrupt
load again.
top output yesterday (low interrupt load):
54 processes: 46 idle, 6 stopped, 2 on processor
CPU0 states: 1.0% user, 0.0% nice, 3.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 96.0%
idle
CPU1 states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 5.
Hi list,
I've just tried snapshot version (5.0beta - 27 Jul). I wanted to test bigmem
with qemu and kqemu.
When I tried to load the kqemu module (pkg_add
ftp://mirror/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/) my system freezes:
kqemu: kqemu version 0x000103000 loaded, max locked mem=2026212kB
uvm_f
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:58 AM, [B&G-Consulting] Elmar Bschorer
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've just tried snapshot version (5.0beta - 27 Jul). I wanted to test bigmem
> with qemu and kqemu.
>
> When I tried to load the kqemu module (pkg_add
> ftp://mirror/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/) my sy
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Whatever this is (and I don't have the slightest clue what that
> might be), I noticed it on a 4.9 box the other day, upgraded to
> -current, still see it there.
> Jul 28 19:46:36 bath-gw /bsd: pf: state key linking mismatch! dir=OUT,
> if=em3, stored af=2, a0: 85.158.4
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Mattieu Baptiste
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's really weird. I see very slow writes when softdep is enabled.
> Write caches seem to be enabled on disks. Utilities like bonnie++
> confirm that writes are very slow with softdep enabled (although it
> helps with lots of f
On 2011-07-28, R0me0 *** wrote:
> Hello misc.
>
> I would like to know if is possible do the following:
>
> clients--OpenBSD_FWExternal_mail_server
>
> when clients send or receive an email, OpenBSD catch this mail and send a
> copy of this to another email account,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:43:52AM +0200, David Vasek wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldKernel has a section
>> >"Variation on above process: Read-only source
frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> sorry for the offtopic but there are probably many knowledgeable
> admins on this list as well.
>
> i am looking for a solution that keeps monitoring file system io
> for all stuff under a certain path and whenever files
> change/get added/removed it synchr
(23:24:04) john@pdc:[~]$ du -sh /usr/lib/libc.so.*
704K /usr/lib/libc.so.34.2
704K /usr/lib/libc.so.35.0
704K /usr/lib/libc.so.35.1
704K /usr/lib/libc.so.36.0
720K /usr/lib/libc.so.37.0
720K /usr/lib/libc.so.38.0
720K /usr/lib/libc.so.38.1
688K /usr/lib/libc.so.38.2
688K /usr/lib/libc.so.38.3
3.8M
Hy Stuart,
Is always very good read your mails here at misc :)
a friend has done it, and he say to me the same that you, to me use (
always_bcc )
Thank you, I'm read a little more, but the ideias now are fixed
Best regards,
2011/7/29 Stuart Henderson
> On 2011-07-28, R0me0 *** wrote:
> >
On 07/29/2011 11:18 AM, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:43:52AM +0200, David Vasek wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
Hi,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldKernel has a section
"Variation on a
find / -type f -perm -0111 -exec ldd {} 2>/dev/null \; -print | awk
'/libc.so/ {print $7}' | sort | uniq
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:50 AM, johnw wrote:
> (23:24:04) john@pdc:[~]$ du -sh /usr/lib/libc.so.*
> 704K /usr/lib/libc.so.34.2
> 704K /usr/lib/libc.so.35.0
[snip]
> 2.4M /usr/lib/libc.so.57.0
On 07/29/11 11:50, johnw wrote:
(23:24:04) john@pdc:[~]$ du -sh /usr/lib/libc.so.*
704K /usr/lib/libc.so.34.2
704K /usr/lib/libc.so.35.0
704K /usr/lib/libc.so.35.1
[43 libc's deleted]
Go clean your room.
--STeve Andre'
Great stuff!!!
These are my kernels (sparc64):
7.0M/bsd
7.0M/bsd.mp
2.5M/bsd.rd
Not so many, but still pretty useless, no ?
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:50:22PM +0800, johnw wrote:
| (23:24:04) john@pdc:[~]$ du -sh /usr/lib/libc.so.*
| 704K /usr/lib/libc.so.34.2
> [...]
There are many like them, but these are yours?
Novedades de recorridos en China - Transatlantico
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> After digging around this problem with help from Pedro, I noticed that
> a 4.9-release kernel works ok, whereas a 5.0-beta does not. So I tried
> to identify which commit was responsible and found out this one is
> responsible of *very* slow writes w
Misc --
Can anyone size hardware that would be required for a IPSec head-end
terminating 1 tunnels. The total bandwidth across all the tunnels is
about 2mb/s. Is this something that can be done on a single server or is some
type of cluster needed. Can this be made to be redundant wi
[IMAGE]
Pms de Mixico Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presenta:Taller
del Sistema SSPA: Sistema de Seguridad, Salud,
Proteccisn Ambiental de PEMEX.29 de Agosto, Ciudad de
Mixico.Expositor: Mtro. Gerardo Coronado L.10 horas de
entrenamiento, Conozca los ben
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
>
>> After digging around this problem with help from Pedro, I noticed that
>> a 4.9-release kernel works ok, whereas a 5.0-beta does not. So I tried
>> to identify which commit was responsible and
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:58 AM, [B&G-Consulting] Elmar Bschorer
wrote:
Hi list,
I've just tried snapshot version (5.0beta - 27 Jul). I wanted to test bigmem
with qemu and kqemu.
When I tried to load the kqemu module (pkg_add
ftp://mirror/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/) my system freez
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:58 AM, [B&G-Consulting] Elmar Bschorer
wrote:
> I've just tried snapshot version (5.0beta - 27 Jul). I wanted to test bigmem
> with qemu and kqemu.
>
> When I tried to load the kqemu module (pkg_add
> ftp://mirror/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/) my system freezes:
28 matches
Mail list logo
