On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:48:20 +0330
Hassan Monfared wrote:
> Hi,
> Any idea for denying connection initiation to outside from any web
> server protected by PF? ( wanna block Trojans and reverse connections
> while incomming http traffic is allowed) .
block all
pass in on $if from any to ($if)
w
"block all"
Permit inbound port 80, but do not permit new outbound connections.
Consider each interface a separate firewall, with separate flows
entirely, then use policy enforcement (see tagging:
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tagging.html) to ensure only properly
tagged packets are passed out fro
Hi,
Any idea for denying connection initiation to outside from any web server
protected by PF? ( wanna block Trojans and reverse connections while
incomming http traffic is allowed) .
Regards,
Hassan H. Monfared
Thanks Bryan. Your explanation makes things a lot clearer to me.
As mentioned in my reply to Daniel, I not cannot figure out why "$1f" will
be "".
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Brynet wrote:
> One of the first things an MBR does is do a long jump from where the BIOS
> loaded it.
>
> The
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Daniel Dickman wrote:
>
> What are you trying to do though? Working with x86 in real mode and dealing
> with ancient PC conventions is probably not the easiest place to start.
I'm trying to learn how kernel (or OS) works.
I went through a couple of books on OS de
Keyboard
"Write Apt And Accurate English"
Dear friends,
The aim of the LCCI Certificate in English for Business Level 2 programme is
to enable candidates to develop the ability to undersatnd and write English
using formats that are current and common in business communication.
Objectives
to enab
Enjoyed the story,
by the way CARP & pfsync seems right solution for us today.
2011/9/25 Eukasz Czarniecki
> W dniu 2011-09-25 17:50, Pui Edylie pisze:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I am trying to put a pair of OBSD box together to provide Syn, UDP and
> > ICMP flood protection with pretty graphs.
>
I can get only noise from the audio of a notebook Acer Aspire
5820T-6825.
The dmesg, audioctl and mixerctl are attached for OpenBSD-4.9 and
for the 2011-09-22 snapshot.
Can anyone give me an help?
--Jairo Souto (38)8816-1254
dmesg:
--
OpenBSD 4.9 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Sun Jul 17 09:40:29 BRT 2011
W dniu 2011-09-25 17:50, Pui Edylie pisze:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am trying to put a pair of OBSD box together to provide Syn, UDP and
> ICMP flood protection with pretty graphs.
>
> May I know if anyone has accomplished this?
Check this out:
Bakeca.it DDoS: How Evil Forces Have Been Defeated
ht
Hi Everyone,
I am trying to put a pair of OBSD box together to provide Syn, UDP and
ICMP flood protection with pretty graphs.
May I know if anyone has accomplished this?
If you had, I have the following question
1. What is the hardware spec you use? What is the maximum attack PPS and
Bandwi
On 9/24/2011 at 6:57 PM Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
|Unfortunately, just a tiny percentage of sold X86 boxes is no-OS, and
also
|dell has stopped selling linux PCs.
|The last "no-OS" one I bought was an HP laptop (HP 360) with suse 11
|onboard. Drops within an ocean.
|Unless EU Commission helps, it'll
On 2011 Sep 25 (Sun) at 08:28:10 +0200 (+0200), Remco wrote:
:Vijay Sankar wrote:
:
:> Is it possible that you are installing packages from the wrong
:> version? I have done that a couple of times because I copied .profile
:> files from the wrong server
:>
:> Is your PKG_PATH set to /pub/OpenBSD/4
Hi,
ropers wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:25:58AM +0200:
>> On 2011-09-23, ropers wrote:
>>>$ mandoc -Tascii /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/dpb3.1 | less
> mandoc -Tascii /usr/ports/infrastructure/man/man1/dpb.1 | less
As you keep citing that line from the outdated undeadly article,
here
Hi,
Remco wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 08:28:10AM +0200:
> To avoid release/architecture mixups you could use something
> like "/pub/OpenBSD/`uname -r`/packages/`uname -m`/".
That sounds like terrible advice:
$ sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 5.0-current (GENERIC) #7: Wed Sep 21
Catalogo de viajes - Setiembre 2011
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:25:58 +0100, ropers wrote:
> > If the ports tree is in the usual place
>
> "If" being the operative word; to quote from undeadly, emphasis added:
This thread is about building -current packages from the ports tree, so I think
it's a reasonable assumption.
> > then yes 'm
To put things in perspective, the dpb framework is now about two years old.
It was a bit quirky and experimental until 4.9.
The addition of /usr/ports/infrastructure/man to man.conf happened a little
before 5.0.
So, people wanting to build packages *for current* should have no problem
accessing
Vijay Sankar wrote:
> Is it possible that you are installing packages from the wrong
> version? I have done that a couple of times because I copied .profile
> files from the wrong server
>
> Is your PKG_PATH set to /pub/OpenBSD/4.9/packages/amd64, for example?
>
To avoid release/architecture mi
18 matches
Mail list logo
