On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:51:31AM -0400, Michel Blais wrote:
> rule inside of a in bracket anchors, pf will see no rule using the table
> and delete it. As a work around, I use persist option.
I don't know if things have changed in the pfctl parser, but a way to
be sure is to have per-anchor co
On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2
> processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have
> no threads (using T under top(1)).
In 5.0 and 5.1 threads are entirely done in userland and won't show
up separately i
On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
>> On 2012/04/20 22:44, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>>> Stuart Henderson writes:
>>>
>>> > On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>>> >>> Also, per process limits play a role.
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Does named has such a limit b
On 20/04/12 8:48 AM, David Diggles wrote:
Hi misc,
Trying to get stateless autoconf working with rtadvd. The following
message is in my log:
rtadvd[32332]: O flag inconsistent on pppoe0: ON from fe80::224:14ff:fe9a:bc00,
OFF from us
The rtadvd.conf(5) man page does not make much sense to me w
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2012/04/20 22:44, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson writes:
>>
>> > On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>> >>> Also, per process limits play a role.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Does named has such a limit by default?
>> >
>> > OpenBSD has a limit by default,
On 2012/04/20 22:44, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> >>> Also, per process limits play a role.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Does named has such a limit by default?
> >
> > OpenBSD has a limit by default, see login.conf(5). Daemons started
>
Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2
processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have
no threads (using T under top(1)).
Is this part of the patches in the OpenBSD version of BIND?
Regards,
Kostas
--
Kostas Zorbadelos
twitter:@kzorb
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>>> Also, per process limits play a role.
>>>
>>
>> Does named has such a limit by default?
>
> OpenBSD has a limit by default, see login.conf(5). Daemons started
> when the system is booted or using /etc/rc.d scripts typically u
On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>> Also, per process limits play a role.
>>
>
> Does named has such a limit by default?
OpenBSD has a limit by default, see login.conf(5). Daemons started
when the system is booted or using /etc/rc.d scripts typically use
the class 'daemon'.
On 04/20/12 07:24, David Coppa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:31 PM, STeve Andre' wrote:
I had a system hang I've never seen before:
Apr 19 15:24:18 s6 /bsd: uvm_km_kmem_grow: grown to 0xffc0
This is only a "diagnostic" informative message, btw...
I've updated things and I haven't g
Simon Perreault writes:
>
> Here's a test protocol for you:
>
> 1. Set your VM to 6G.
It is set to 8GB.
> 2. Set max-cache-size to 4G.
> 3. Measure how many records it can store.
I didn't have a way to see that but just found
rndc dumpdb -cache :)
Do you have any other suggestion?
rndc stats
On 2012-04-20 14:07, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
Eventually you are right. However I am trying to answer the primitive
question: should I buy servers with a lot of RAM or not? If BIND cannot
utilize more than 4GB let's say, it makes no sense to buy servers with
32GB. The servers' only role will be c
Simon Perreault writes:
> On 2012-04-20 07:43, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
Hi Simon,
>> I understand the kernel VM layers are completely different, but how come
>> the named process on OpenBSD for the same load consumes so low resident
>> memory? Also, why VZS< RSS on OpenBSD?
>> The general ques
Otto Moerbeek writes:
>
> You neglect to tell us platform details so we cannot tell.
>
I mentioned
>> trying to fill as much as I can in BIND's cache and I use 2 VMs with
>> identical configuration (2 CPUs, 8GB RAM) for the systems to perform the
>> tests.
more details:
kzorba@openbsd: ~ ->
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:48:59PM +1000, David Diggles wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> Trying to get stateless autoconf working with rtadvd. The following message
> is in my log:
>
> rtadvd[32332]: O flag inconsistent on pppoe0: ON from
> fe80::224:14ff:fe9a:bc00, OFF from us
>
> The rtadvd.conf(5) ma
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:43:05PM +0300, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Hello all, sorry for the big mail that follows.
>
> These are my first attempts at fine tuning and stress testing in OpenBSD
> so excuse my ignorance.
> I am stress testing BIND as a resolver on Linux (CentOS 6) and OpenBSD
> (5
On 2012-04-20 07:43, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
I understand the kernel VM layers are completely different, but how come
the named process on OpenBSD for the same load consumes so low resident
memory? Also, why VZS< RSS on OpenBSD?
The general question I am trying to answer is, can BIND utilize al
Hi misc,
Trying to get stateless autoconf working with rtadvd. The following message is
in my log:
rtadvd[32332]: O flag inconsistent on pppoe0: ON from fe80::224:14ff:fe9a:bc00,
OFF from us
The rtadvd.conf(5) man page does not make much sense to me with regards to
raflags, how do I set the
Hello all, sorry for the big mail that follows.
These are my first attempts at fine tuning and stress testing in OpenBSD
so excuse my ignorance.
I am stress testing BIND as a resolver on Linux (CentOS 6) and OpenBSD
(5.0 release). I will evaluate unbound since this will be included
in base also la
2012/4/20 Stuart Henderson :
>> If you can Matt, try to set the carppeer option so it unicasts carp
>> status packets between the hosts over the vlans, and see if it helps.
>
> The parent iface not being in promisc mode is likely to at least
> break reception of packets destined for the carp MAC ad
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:31 PM, STeve Andre' wrote:
> I had a system hang I've never seen before:
>
> Apr 19 15:24:18 s6 /bsd: uvm_km_kmem_grow: grown to 0xffc0
This is only a "diagnostic" informative message, btw...
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:31:25PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> I had a system hang I've never seen before:
>
> Apr 19 15:24:18 s6 /bsd: uvm_km_kmem_grow: grown to 0xffc0
>
> It was in an infinite loop; I couldn't ssh into the machine nor could
> I crtl-alt-F2 to another console, so I have no
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On 18 April 2012 19:04, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> Alexei Malinin wrote:
>>> At a time when I listen to music on the xmms
>>> and simultaneously begin to move any X window,
>>> the sound stops. The sound resumes after finishing
>>> of moving of the window .
>> Yes. For s
On 2012/04/20 08:54, Janne Johansson wrote:
> Overall, this sounds like the "missing arp" issue in some regards.
That was specifically affecting 50+ carp interfaces with the same
physical parent interface (or iirc bridged vlans).
> As for the recent threads about carps misbehaving, I had at least
On 18 April 2012 19:04, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Alexei Malinin wrote:
>
>> At a time when I listen to music on the xmms
>> and simultaneously begin to move any X window,
>> the sound stops. The sound resumes after finishing
>> of moving of the window .
>
> Yes. B For some window operations
25 matches
Mail list logo
