Re: pflow info on 5.1

2012-07-07 Thread Henning Brauer
* Michael Gale michael.g...@pason.com [2012-07-07 00:26]: I have read over the docs but it is not clear if I can run a netflow sensor / emitter per interface? If so then on the netflow server I could query by sensor. The other thing that came to mind is in the past with a different vendor I

GRANDES VENTAJAS! Ventanilla Única de Comercio Exterior 314034

2012-07-07 Thread Lic. Estrella Murillo
314034 [IMAGE] Taller de Manejo Óptimo de la Ventanilla Única de Comercio Exterior 27 de Julio, Cd. de México. Un taller totalmente práctico guiado por un experto. Optimice sus procesos y ahorre dinero con esta práctica herramienta! ¡Reciba la información completa, Inscríbase y Capacítese! Por

Smtpd.conf(5) %a and %u

2012-07-07 Thread percy piper
Hi all. Smtpd.conf(5) states that %a expands to the user before alias resolution and %u after. Is it the other way round? I am probably missing something but on the latest i386 snap it seems %a and %u do the opposite to what smtpd.conf(5) claims? Can anyone clarify? Many thanks Percy

Vacances en bateau : promos été dernière minute

2012-07-07 Thread Les Canalous
Untitled Document Vous pilotez un bateau totalement eacute;quipeacute; (four, reacute;frigeacute;rateur, feux de cuisson, cabines confortables) vous permettant d'eacute;tre autonome presque comme agrave; la maison. Navigation sans permis et sans expeacute;rience, de 2 agrave; 12

OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread llemike...@aol.com
Dear Your name should be here ;-) , I have been considering the implications for BSD and Linux and any non-MS O/S of the implementation of UEFI Secure Boot (SB). As I understand it, ARM devices wishing to receive Win8 cert are required to enable SB by default and prevent the disabling of SB.

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Be realistic. Talking about it on misc won't change anything. Dear Your name should be here ;-) , I have been considering the implications for BSD and Linux and any non-MS O/S of the implementation of UEFI Secure Boot (SB). As I understand it, ARM devices wishing to receive Win8 cert are

Re: authpf bug and solution

2012-07-07 Thread Henning Brauer
* Bahador NazariFard bahador.nazarif...@gmail.com [2012-06-26 20:35]: unfortunately authpf does not delete nat state when user disconnected. I believe I just committed the fix for this. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread llemike...@aol.com
T, A!! Oh Yes I see what you are doing... Ah-hahaha, Yes - I agree Talk is so much puff... We need to DO... Time to work on CoreBoot or our own (who else will do it?) aftermarket BIOS solutions... Mike's plan: 1) Get EPROM programmer with PLCC adaptor 2) Get surface mount torch

Re: authpf bug and solution

2012-07-07 Thread Bahador NazariFard
Hi Dear Friendhs Im sorry I looked for about this problem and its solution. but i couldn't find any solution. If you commited the fix how can I access fixed authpf. Im using OpenBSD 5.1. On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Henning Brauer henn...@openbsd.org wrote: * Bahador NazariFard

Un technicien informatique chez vous, rapide serieux efficace et économique

2012-07-07 Thread UTILE
ABC DEPAN’PC FREE SPECIALISTE DU DEPANNAGE INFORMATIQUE A DOMICILE ASSISTANCE REPARATION ORDINATEUR PORTABLE - PC DE BUREAU POUR SEULEMENT 22,50 € après déductions fiscales * Soit 45 € DE L’HEURE avant déductions fiscales * PARIS ET REGION PARISIENNE 24h/24h – 7j/7j (Paris et proche banlieue)

Re: Virtualizing firewalling scenarios in one physical OpenBSD host

2012-07-07 Thread Илья Шипицин
Look at www.fwbuilder.org It is good. It even has commercial support if you like. ÓÒÅÄÁ, 4 ÉÀÌÑ 2012 Ç. ÐÏÌØÚÏ×ÁÔÅÌØ C. L. Martinez ÐÉÓÁÌ: Hi all, I wonder if with OpenBSD is possible to create virtualized firewalled implementations of conventional physical topologies and designs such as

Re: authpf bug and solution

2012-07-07 Thread James Hartley
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Bahador NazariFard bahador.nazarif...@gmail.com wrote: If you commited the fix how can I access fixed authpf. Im using OpenBSD 5.1. You will need to install -current.

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread David Diggles
With all the investment in non MS, mission critical / non portable apps, in the proprietry world alone, do you really think Microsoft can ever take over all of i386? Surely they can only try, and keep on trying, but it is an unwinnable arms race, and someone is going to be willing to pay for a

Re: 4g (LTE) modem

2012-07-07 Thread Alexei Malinin
Alexei Malinin wrote: Hello, could anybody recommend OpenBSD compatible 4g (LTE) modem? I tried to use recent Qualcomm MDM9200 chipset (http://www.qualcomm.com/media/releases/2010/09/08/qualcomm-now-demonstrating-products-based-lte-tdd-technology) based Huawei E392 modem

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:46 PM, llemike...@aol.com llemike...@aol.com wrote: Dear Your name should be here ;-) , I have been considering the implications for BSD and Linux and any non-MS O/S of the implementation of UEFI Secure Boot (SB). As I understand it, ARM devices wishing to receive

Re: 4g (LTE) modem

2012-07-07 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 09:24:50PM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote: Alexei Malinin wrote: Hello, could anybody recommend OpenBSD compatible 4g (LTE) modem? I tried to use recent Qualcomm MDM9200 chipset

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread Bob Beck
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.comwrote: World is trying much worse stuff than UEFI http://extratorrent.com/article/2263/uk+prime+minister+calls+for+online+porn+ban.html What? they're going to ban porn? That's it, I'm quitting the internets.

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread llemike...@aol.com
Tomas (and David and E.V.R. Else-Body) Yes - I'd read the thread(s) (Gentoo too..) - but the ultimate conclusion of much of the discussion is buy different hardware. I bought Betamax (because it was the best)... until... I bought SAAB (because it was the best)... until... I bought Amiga

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 06:54:31PM +0100, llemike...@aol.com wrote: Tomas (and David and E.V.R. Else-Body) Yes - I'd read the thread(s) (Gentoo too..) - but the ultimate conclusion of much of the discussion is buy different hardware. I bought Betamax (because it was the best)... until...

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread Chris Bennett
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 06:54:31PM +0100, llemike...@aol.com wrote: I bought Betamax (because it was the best)... until... I bought SAAB (because it was the best)... until... I bought Amiga (because it was the best)... until... I don't want to be saying... I bou.. erm.. got... OpenBSD

Re: OpenBSD - UEFI Secure Boot

2012-07-07 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Bob Beck b...@obtuse.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote: World is trying much worse stuff than UEFI http://extratorrent.com/article/2263/uk+prime+minister+calls+for+online+porn+ban.html What? they're

Kernel panic on -current

2012-07-07 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Hi, I appolagize for the not-so-descriptive subject, I've really no idea that the exact issue was. I upgraded to -current this afternoon, and a while ago my server stopped responding remotely. I had a look at it, and I the kernel has printed the following: First bad /: bad dir ino 11 at offset