On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:35 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Because they can just hack it on top of their crusty old ftp server
software, whereas using sftp would need much bigger changes?
SSL/TLS makes everything more secure
And DPI-based products are slow to fix their
On 30.11.2012 06:29, zgeggy2k wrote:
Yes, I tried stacking them one after the other (first raiding, then
crypto'ing) - didn't work.
Try that :
wd0a wd1a are RAID partitions.
bioctl -c 1 -l wd0a,wd1a softraid0
Create a RAID partition on the new raid device sd0.
bioctl -c C -r 8192 -l
On 2012-11-29, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org
wrote:
Looks like skipping ftp-proxy for that target address works. Thanks!
Is there any way to make this work automagically for ftps?
Right now I'm doing this:
* Friedrich Locke friedrich.lo...@gmail.com [2012-11-13 00:05]:
i am planning to write a simple web server. My initial ideia for this
server is that it will only serve static content.
So, i would like to have the best possible performance.
you are reinevnting the wheel, to put it nicely.
I
Jiri B [ji...@devio.us] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:13:47PM -0200, Friedrich Locke wrote:
So what would a BSD cloud be different in the context of cloud (not openbsd
features) ?
You can of course try to port KVM to OpenBSD, hehe.
OpenBSD supports Sun's LDom hypervisor hardware
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
Not exactly, but you might be able to do something with this, *before*
your ftp-proxy rule:
pass out quick proto tcp to 0.0.0.0/0 port 8821 rdr-to 0.0.0.0/0 port 21
bitmask
Then if you tell your ftp client to
6 matches
Mail list logo
