2013/5/2 STeve Andre'
> Can someone point me to the proper patch for ACPI so I don't reboot
> any more? Thanks.
>
Do you mean disabling acpitz(4) when it does the Wrong Thing, or
ThinkPad-specific patch I was posting some time ago (and still want to
incorporate but after 64-bit time_t)?
--
W
> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 09:25:52 + (UTC)
> From: Stuart Henderson
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: rtl_sdr (was: Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports)
> Message-ID:
>
> On 2013-04-29, noah pugsley wrote:
>> So glad to see this. Receiving broadcast FM isn't even the half of it.
>>
>> From rtl
> pkg_scripts="afpd cnid_metad"
Tim replied me privately that he solved the problem,
also the order of the daemons mattered.
pkg_scripts="cnid_metad afpd"
(or, pkg_scripts="netatalk")
was correct way to do so.
Hopefully this thread helps who those having similar problems.
Cheers,
--
yoshi
On May 1, 2013 5:54:32 AM EDT, Yoshihisa Matsushita said:
> From: Tim Leonard
> Subject: Netatalk (Apple Filing Protocol) daemon replies "Something wrong
> with the volume's CNID DB"
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:36:40 -0400
>
>> I'm having a problem using Apple Filing Protocol (AFP) services pr
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:33 PM, staticsafe wrote:
> KDE seems to be at a much older version than what upstream is at
> currently. What gives?
Updated ports for KDE 4 were just added recently, but not in time for
OpenBSD 5.3.
Also, keep in mind, all of the packages are largely maintained by
volun
Can someone point me to the proper patch for ACPI so I don't reboot
any more? Thanks.
--STeve Andre'
On 5/1/2013 21:11, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:33 PM, staticsafe wrote:
>> KDE seems to be at a much older version than what upstream is at
>> currently. What gives?
>
> Updated ports for KDE 4 were just added recently, but not in time for
> OpenBSD 5.3.
Thank you for the i
Going through the 5.3 release notes, noticed something odd:
GNOME 3.6.2
*KDE 3.5.10*
Xfce 4.10
KDE seems to be at a much older version than what upstream is at
currently. What gives?
--
staticsafe
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
Please don't top post - http://goo.
hello,
woke up this morning to the following panic, upon reboot the machine
almost immediately (~5 mins) panicked again, but with a slightly
different message. My server is a hosted VPS, so my only console is
over VNC which means there is no copy / paste functionality. After
talking to sthen@ he
I have resolved the issue. This box had a custom set of pf rules being
conditionally loaded based on some ifstated logic. Doh! :)
My border routers obtain a default route in fact, and OSPF must
redistribute this route to LAN Routers. Here is a scheme
|-- R1 site 1 R3 Site 1
| BGP AS 650XX | OSPF a3|
|-- R2 site 1 R4 Site 1
|
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:00:55PM +0200, Loïc BLOT wrote:
> In fact, this isn't really an interarea problem but a inter protocol
> problem.
>
> Next month i'll have two border routers which are connecter to MAN by
> BGP. In my LAN and on my tunnels i'm in a "LAN backbone" area.
>
> Because of th
Hello!
I have set up npppd for an L2TP/IPsec VPN on 5.3 (great work, by the way
:) ).
I've added this rule to my pf.conf set:
pass quick on pppx from any to $int_if:network
Everything works perfectly after I apply the rule with "pfctl -f
/etc/pf.conf". However, the rule does not get loaded on s
Jan Stary writes:
> I just started using plfow(4) on the router/firewall
> of my small home network. What do people recommend for
> collection and analysis tools? So far, I am aware of
> packages for flow-tools, flowd, and softflowd.
My absolute favorite is nfdump feeding nfsen. pkg_add nfsen an
In fact, this isn't really an interarea problem but a inter protocol
problem.
Next month i'll have two border routers which are connecter to MAN by
BGP. In my LAN and on my tunnels i'm in a "LAN backbone" area.
Because of the priority of OSPF and the default route redistribution,
the default rout
* Stuart Henderson [130501 08:15]:
May 1, 2013.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.3.
This is our 33rd release on CD-ROM (and 34th via FTP). We remain
proud of OpenBSD's record of more than ten y
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 08:56:32PM +0300, Dan Shechter wrote:
> You can't filter OSPF routes inside an area. It will break the OSPF
> shortest path tree.
>
> I don't know about ospfd, but on Cisco IOS you can filter routes
> (LSAs) between areas and you can also prevent prefixes from being
> inser
I use nfdump for netflow collection and analysis.
diana
Past hissy-fits are not a predictor of future hissy-fits.
Nick Holland(06 Dec 2005)
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Jan Stary wrote:
I just started using plfow(4) on the router/firewall
of my small home network. What do people recommend for
collecti
You can't filter OSPF routes inside an area. It will break the OSPF
shortest path tree.
I don't know about ospfd, but on Cisco IOS you can filter routes
(LSAs) between areas and you can also prevent prefixes from being
inserted to the routing table of the router where the filtering
commands are en
OK for the tree, but refuse to insert routes in the kernel is useful.
It would be a great function to refuse inserting kernel routes from some
routers.
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT,
UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mercredi 01 mai 2013 Ã 20:56 +0300, Da
On 1.5.2013. 19:11, Jan Stary wrote:
> I just started using plfow(4) on the router/firewall
> of my small home network. What do people recommend for
> collection and analysis tools? So far, I am aware of
> packages for flow-tools, flowd, and softflowd.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jan
>
I
I just started using plfow(4) on the router/firewall
of my small home network. What do people recommend for
collection and analysis tools? So far, I am aware of
packages for flow-tools, flowd, and softflowd.
Thanks
Jan
Hello all,
to begin, thanks to OpenBSD team & contributors for this very good
release.
I have a question about ospfd. Why ospfd doesn't have capabitilities to
filter some routes, or filter by sources ? (ok by source can be filtered
by PF, but if i want to refuse routes from specific hosts, or some
Hello all,
to begin, thanks to OpenBSD team & contributors for this very good
release.
I have a question about ospfd. Why ospfd doesn't have capabitilities to
filter some routes, or filter by sources ? (ok by source can be filtered
by PF, but if i want to refuse routes from specific hosts, or some
May 1, 2013.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.3.
This is our 33rd release on CD-ROM (and 34th via FTP). We remain
proud of OpenBSD's record of more than ten years with only two remote
holes in the
mxb(m...@alumni.chalmers.se) on 2013.05.01 12:09:28 +0200:
> Hello list@,
>
> I'v encountered a bit odd, in my opinion, behavior of relayd.
>
> If relayd configured to listen on the IP attached to the physical NIC for a
> given relay,
> then I can see it creating an anchor for this relay in pf(p
Hi,
I am trying to connect Amazon Web Services IPSec VPN with OpenBSD 5.2.
They provide two seperate tunnels. I am trying to connect only one of
them.
It continuously disconnects and reconnects in approximately 1 minute
periods.
I am working as a database administrator. I do not have much expe
Hello list@,
I'v encountered a bit odd, in my opinion, behavior of relayd.
If relayd configured to listen on the IP attached to the physical NIC for a
given relay,
then I can see it creating an anchor for this relay in pf(pfctl -a 'relayd/*'
-sr).
However then IP attached to the carp is used i
Hi Tim,
From: Tim Leonard
Subject: Netatalk (Apple Filing Protocol) daemon replies "Something wrong with
the volume's CNID DB"
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:36:40 -0400
> I'm having a problem using Apple Filing Protocol (AFP) services provided by
> netatalk on OpenBSD, from an OS X Mountain Lion cl
On 2013-05-01, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> Le 04/29/13 06:03, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera a écrit :
>> On 2013-04-20 12:15, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2013-04-20, Alokat MacMoneysack wrote:
Hi,
first, I don't want to start a flame war about why is CVS better or not
>> better than X - it
On 2013-04-29, noah pugsley wrote:
> So glad to see this. Receiving broadcast FM isn't even the half of it.
>
> From rtlsdr.org:
>
>
>- FM: both narrow band and wideband. The former is used on two way radio
>systems such as emergency services and private radio networks (like
>couriers
With recent snapshots, the wsdisplay allows for more text
realestate. On most of my machines it works fine,
but on this amd64 (see dmesg bellow), it does not cover
the whole screen; like this:
+-+
| |
|
32 matches
Mail list logo
