On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:08:09PM +0200, Moritz Grimm wrote:
| Hi,
|
|
| This is an FYI on how to move past flag day with SSH access only. I used
| this process on my local workstation first, then verified it on a VM
| actually using SSH only (both amd64). I'll do it again when updating a
| bunc
Hi,
This is an FYI on how to move past flag day with SSH access only. I used
this process on my local workstation first, then verified it on a VM
actually using SSH only (both amd64). I'll do it again when updating a
bunch of important boxes to 5.5 in 2014, so this is also for the
archives in cas
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:58:38PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> OK - this explains why upgrading was a total disaster: I got caught in
> the trap of an outdated -/i386/install54.iso :-) Shouldn't this file
> better be removed until a new, valid version has been created as it is
> even older than
!-- On Mon 19.Aug'13 at 13:21:43 BST, Peter Hessler (phess...@theapt.org),
wrote:
> On 2013 Aug 19 (Mon) at 11:33:41 +0100 (+0100), James Griffin wrote:
> :Sorry for repeating the information on the website, I just like to be
> :absolutely clear.
>
> How can we make the website be absolutely mor
On 2013 Aug 19 (Mon) at 11:33:41 +0100 (+0100), James Griffin wrote:
:Sorry for repeating the information on the website, I just like to be
:absolutely clear.
How can we make the website be absolutely more clear? It is pretty
specific about things already.
--
A witty saying proves nothing.
!-- On Mon 19.Aug'13 at 11:58:44 BST, Otto Moerbeek (o...@drijf.net), wrote:
[ ... ]
> A package snap for amd64 was uploaded to the main ftp site. It will
> take some time to propagate to your mirror, but after that, you should
> be good to go. Just check the timestamps. Anything from before
> m
OK - this explains why upgrading was a total disaster: I got caught in
the trap of an outdated -/i386/install54.iso :-) Shouldn't this file
better be removed until a new, valid version has been created as it is
even older than the one in -i386/t32?(No complaint on my side - I should
have been more
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33:41AM +0100, James Griffin wrote:
> Hi
>
> On the ftp server I usually get my snapshots from [1] there are the sets
> for upgrade. There is also a new t32 directory that contains the same
> upgrade sets (or the same names and dates, at least).
These are OLD sets.
>
Hi
On the ftp server I usually get my snapshots from [1] there are the sets
for upgrade. There is also a new t32 directory that contains the same
upgrade sets (or the same names and dates, at least).
Would I be right in assuming I need to download the sets from this new
t32 directory on the serve
!-- On Mon 19.Aug'13 at 6:56:04 BST, Matthieu Herrb (mhe...@gmail.com), wrote:
[ ... ]
> And for the few cases where an xorg.conf file is needed, just read the
> xorg.conf(5) man page and use a text editor to create one containing
> only the needed section(s).
You were joking when you wrote
Hello!
after deploying windows 2012 we encountered that it enables ECN by
default and sometime it is a problem.
I studied "pf" guides, but I did not find whether it could strip ECN
flag (we use OpenBSD as routers) or not.
Cheers,
Ilya Shipitsin
11 matches
Mail list logo
