Hello,
I was to begin tests with FlowViewer (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/flowviewer/),
which needs SiLK, which, in turns, needs libfixbuf, both from NetSA/CERT:
http://tools.netsa.cert.org
Are there anyone using these softwares?
I am able to download only if I accept GPLv2 (or LGPLv2) and
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 03:39, Raimundo Santos wrote:
Government Purpose License Rights (GPLR) pursuant to DFARS 252.227.7013
I could not find good information sources about it. So, I ask:
1 - These kind of licences are meaningful by a Brazilian (i.e., USA's
outsiders) point of view?
2 -
On 28 Sep 2014, at 05:00, System Administrator ad...@bitwise.net wrote:
On 27 Sep 2014 at 18:50, Andrew Lester wrote:
Hey guys,
I have what I hope is a simple syntax question for pf rules. I have not
been able to find any example of this online or in the man pages. I
suspect it is
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:12:55PM -0400, Ted W. wrote:
I have really enjoyed the last few weeks of running OpenBSD on my
Thinkpad. Almost everything I need works and or worked right out of
the box. The only real issue I've noticed is that when the system
returns from suspend and press
On 28 Sep 2014 at 8:44, Andy Lemin wrote:
On 28 Sep 2014, at 05:00, System Administrator ad...@bitwise.net
wrote:
On 27 Sep 2014 at 18:50, Andrew Lester wrote:
Hey guys,
I have what I hope is a simple syntax question for pf rules. I have
not been able to find any example of
On 28 September 2014 04:13, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
You are not the government, so instead the software is available to
you under the terms of the LGPL.
Thank you for the clarification.
I got that it has nothing to do with GPL or FSF at all just reading the
name: it is pretty
All was fine. But the google people are strange. They make an online raffle
where you can win a chromebook (hey, why not) and they ask some test
questions.
The guy from google went on-stage, commented that nobody got all the uestions
right, then went on to remind everyone that if was a *raffle*,
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:05:11 -0400, System Administrator
ad...@bitwise.net wrote:
On 28 Sep 2014 at 8:44, Andy Lemin wrote:
On 28 Sep 2014, at 05:00, System Administrator ad...@bitwise.net
wrote:
On 27 Sep 2014 at 18:50, Andrew Lester wrote:
Hey guys,
I have what I hope is
andy wrote:
I have what I hope is a simple syntax question for pf rules.
BTW 3rd edition about to be released.
The Book of PF
In the third edition of The Book of PF (No Starch Press, Oct 2014, 248 pp., $34.95), author Peter N.M. Hansteen returns
with more of the life-saving PF and BSD help
2014-09-28 22:49 GMT+02:00 Jack Woehr jwo...@softwoehr.com:
BTW 3rd edition about to be released.
The ebook _has_ been released. :-)
Best
Martin
A problem that seems to come up over and over again with egress filtering
firewalls are sites that move IPs so the names need to be resolved periodically
and rules updated.
I recently migrated to using pf and was wondering if anyone had suggestions for
how they tackle this problem.
I realize
Thanks all! My actual issue was using braces more than once. To the last person
that replied -- that was precisely what I am trying to avoid, having a rule
defined for each set of ports!
Warm regards,
Andrew
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 2014, at 9:00 PM, System Administrator
i run some scripts out of cron (and from rc.local on boot) to keep some tables
in sync with DNS. the scripts are perl so i can use Net::DNS, but apart from
that its been pretty robust and straightforward.
dlg
On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:44, Austin Gilbert austin.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
A problem
13 matches
Mail list logo
