Hi,
I was happy to have (almost) fully functional ThinkPad T440 laptop
installed with -current for a few days, but it appears that iwm does
not connect to networks anymore.
ifconfig scan shows results, but I can't connect.
pacija@efreet:~ $ sudo ifconfig iwm0 scan
iwm0:
On Mon, 25 May 2015 06:19:33 -0400
Jiri B ji...@devio.us wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:09:31PM +0200, Marko CupaÄ? wrote:
iwm0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 5c:51:4f:78:c6:1b
priority: 4
groups: wlan
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect (DS1 mode
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:51:39PM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
Blackberry for security? or something else.
BlackBerry has notably fewer exploits than other platforms, especially
Android-anything. I haven't bought a new one recently but the older ones
were actually good phones as in they don't drop
M Wheeler said:
Android is the most targeted platform by malware by a massive degree.
Whatever you do, don't get an android.
This is not supported by evidence. Actually, only vendors of
antivirus software for android really claim any meaningful amount of
malware, and even then they fail to
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:09:31PM +0200, Marko Cupa�? wrote:
iwm0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 5c:51:4f:78:c6:1b
priority: 4
groups: wlan
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect (DS1 mode 11g)
status: no network
ieee80211: nwid ktulhu
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
Gareth Nelson wrote:
Why on earth would you say blackberry for security?
Get an android device with an unlocked bootloader, encrypt the storage
Android is the most targeted platform by malware by a massive degree.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:12:01PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
This is not supported by evidence. Actually, only vendors of
antivirus software for android really claim any meaningful amount of
malware, and even then they fail to point at anything in particular.
That might be true. I
Hi,
Any statement for iked?
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:55:42PM +0200, L.R. D.S. wrote:
Anyone write today on @misc and @tech about this, so I'll ask just to
make sure:
is OpenIKED and/or OpenSMTPD vulnerable to this
Since I'm running postfix with LibreSSL, some clients encrypt the
connection using ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305. Now I'm used to seeing
headers like using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
(128/128 bits) . But these ChaCha20 headers look like using TLSv1.2
with cipher
ps. this is a cross post from the postfix-users mailing list where they
advised me to contact the LibreSSL developers*.
recap:
Postfix outputs:
cipher_usebits/cipher_algbits
obtained via:
cipher = SSL_get_current_cipher(ssl);
cipher_usebits = SSL_CIPHER_get_bits(cipher,
I'm sorry, how this is OpenBSD related?
4chan /g/ love this kind of discussion, you guys should try there.
Thanks John for in dept detail... BB seems good. be cause i travel lot and
mail usually using mobile only. keyboard seems better idea.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:16 PM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:51:39PM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
Blackberry for security? or
Sorry LRDS .. but openbsd-misc. :)
That's right, it is OpenBSD misc, not just misc.
I don't care about your birthday. The other 4504 subscribers of this list are
unlikely to care, as well.
I've already sent you a private message, but it seems it didn't help. I'm
repeating myself:
This list
Petak 15.05.2015. | Objavila: Promedia.
Inspiracija za ljeto * Posao uz
zabavu
Jedni ce se mozda usuditi zajahati naseg konjica i kao u stara vremena
krenuti na put. Drugi ce pokrenuti svoj play park, uzivati u zabavi i kusati
novi posao, dok neki novi klinci bacaju laso.
U promedia zelimo Vas
Hello misc,
Anyone having much luck with 5.7 or -current on Thinkpad X1 Carbon
2nd gen (Haswell chip)?
Everything seems to be working fine, except for waking from suspend.
Suspend works fine, either via 'zzz' or closing the lid, but waking
it up doesn't work -- hardware seems unresponsive, the
Let's get back on topic then
Is it theoretically possible to boot an OpenBSD kernel on an average
android device?
Were it not for licensing issues i'd suggest getting drivers from the
android kernel and working to do precisely that - clean room method anyone?
---
âLanie, Iâm going
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Tim Kuijsten i...@netsend.nl wrote:
Since I'm running postfix with LibreSSL, some clients encrypt the connection
using ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305. Now I'm used to seeing headers like
Sorry LRDS .. but openbsd-misc. :) I am getting good phone for my b'day
present :) not going to do same mistake as i did with CentOS.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:12 PM, L.R. D.S. arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, how this is OpenBSD related?
4chan /g/ love this kind of discussion, you guys
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Tim Kuijsten i...@netsend.nl wrote:
Since I'm running postfix with LibreSSL, some clients encrypt the connection
using ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305. Now I'm used to seeing headers like
using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits) . But
These software were using the child process PID + a Unix timestamp as
seed.
Such patterns are the problem. End of story, really.
OpenBSD, as a security conscious OS, has already implemented a
protection against such exploit (cool :) !), but I'm surprised by the
technical choices made here
Hello,
I had a question regarding random PID usage and implementation in
OpenBSD. Sorry by advance if my question may seem obvious, but I did
not manage to find any really satisfying answer.
I was reading an article (french magazine MISC issue 74) written by the
author of CVE-2014-0016
It is not the responsibility of the operating system to protect its
users against software which assumes using the pid as a random source is
a bright and wise idea.
That is only the beginning of it.
The entire concept of merging a 32 bits of globally known data, with
16 bits which are less
I'm preparing a new flash image for an Intel Atom dual core based router
with 2gb of ram. I'm curious if there are current comments on the current
performance of the two platforms? I know in the past the i386 was actually
faster at things like PF, but that was several years ago.
Thanks,
It is not the responsibility of the operating system to protect its
users against software which assumes using the pid as a random source is
a bright and wise idea.
On 05/25/15 18:41, Bill Buhler wrote:
I'm preparing a new flash image for an Intel Atom dual core based router
^^
with 2gb of ram. I'm curious if there are current comments on the current
performance of the two platforms? I know in the past the
On 25 May 2015 at 20:05, Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
Many seem to think tuning a firewall is like drag racing, where every 1%
might be the difference between winning and losing. It isn't. It is
like driving in traffic -- you can't go faster than any of a number of
26 matches
Mail list logo
