On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:10 AM, bluesun08 wrote:
> beside OpenBSD 5.8 i installed FreeBSD 10.3 on my router-pc. For routing i
> use pf.
> I noticed that the routing/NAT-performance is in FreeBSD noticeable higher
> than in OpenBSD. I think that is due to the SMP-support of pf in FreeBSD.
>
> Is
Can you please test the kern.bufcachepercent values 10, 20 and 90
separately and have each of those individual tests based on 5 tests each
for the respective setting?
You would need to ensure that the buf cache had equal contents at each
test iteration, so each test needs to be preceded by a r
I rm -rf /usr/ports on the newly upgraded laptop running generic 5.9 amd
MP kernel. /usr is mounted with the option softdep. It took ages for rm
to finish. Laptop has 4GB of RAM. The HDD is SSD with the capacity 931
GB and fully encrypted.
Playing little bit with
sysctl bufcacheparcent
and BUF
..And if you buy more RAM someday remember that the buffer cache is
limited to 32 bits currently i.e. <4GB in total size. I trust that limit
will be lifted someday.
On 2016-04-17 11:50, Tinker wrote:
Just set it to 90??
(And ensure you set the right thing i.e. kern.bufcachepercent rightly
sp
Just set it to 90??
(And ensure you set the right thing i.e. kern.bufcachepercent rightly
spelled.)
On 2016-04-17 11:43, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I rm -rf /usr/ports on the newly upgraded laptop running generic 5.9
amd
MP kernel. /usr is mounted with the option softdep. It took ages for rm
t
Bryan Everly wrote:
>
> Boot the installer. Exit to the shell. Then do:
>
> bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0a softraid0
>
Unless I did something really stupid I would swear that I upgraded fully
encrypted laptop running 5.8 to 5.9 easier.
I downloaded bsd.rd for 5.9 and put into /. Then I rebooted the
On 2016-04-16, Geoff Wozniak wrote:
> How can I go about determining why this is happening? That is,
> what are some good techniques on OpenBSD that let me debug this?
> And are there any clues that anyone can recommend I keep an eye
> out for?
My first guess would be different shell initial
Geoff Wozniak wrote:
>
> # zsh -c 'x=$(false); echo $?'
> 0
>
> This seemed odd to me; I expect the result to be '1'. In fact,
> '1' is what both ksh and bash produce on the same system. On
> other systems I have access to (Linux variants, FreeBSD, other
> OpenBSD installs), ksh, bash, a
Immediately after a fresh install of 5.9 on my Thinkpad X200, I
installed zsh5.2p2 using "pkg_add zsh" (via
openbsd.cs.toronto.edu). I then ran a test.
# zsh -c 'x=$(false); echo $?'
0
This seemed odd to me; I expect the result to be '1'. In fact,
'1' is what both ksh and bash produce on
On 2016-04-16 12.57.56 -0700, bluesun08 wrote:
> So, please can you say me how to activate SMP pf support in OpenBSD ?
Be sure to run a MP kernel. You can verify with: dmesg | grep MP
To track progress so you know where to help, search tech@ for "unlock":
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&w=2&r=1&
So, please can you say me how to activate SMP pf support in OpenBSD ?
--
View this message in context:
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-vs-freebsd-NAT-performance-tp294095p294121.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Quoting Sly Midnight :
> I got it to work exactly as you suggested using isakmpd.conf.
>
> It took me quite a bit of searching to find the correct sort of syntax
> for that file to achieve what I wanted but it now allows me to connect.
>
> But I've run into another issue that I cannot resolve my
The way I have created a queue in shell is:
(1) create a directory to manage queue entries.
(2) file names in that directory are high precision timer values
(3) file contents in that directory are command lines.
Then you need something to service the queue.
In my case, I also decided that I coul
> Hi,
> beside OpenBSD 5.8 i installed FreeBSD 10.3 on my router-pc. For routing i
> use pf.
Pf has not very much to do with routing, as I remembeer. Can you give
more details?
> I noticed that the routing/NAT-performance is in FreeBSD noticeable higher
> than in OpenBSD.
How did you test? The
Hey,
is there any reason to no setting dhcp-class-indentifier by default in
dhclient?
My guess is that this is probably not mandatory?
//mxb
>Why not ed?
And why not list all commands??
Because it is unneccessary. I believe you are not trying to
contribute anything valuable with your comment.
0
C Philippines
P National Capital Region
T Taguig City
Z 1633
O EDGEKIT Computer Systems
I Tito Mari Francis H. Escano
A Block 1 Lot 24 Zone 1 Central Bicutan
M titomarifran...@edgekit.com
U http://www.edgekit.com/
B +63 916 640 2020
X N/A
N EDGEKIT Computer Systems is proudly the only company in
Hi,
beside OpenBSD 5.8 i installed FreeBSD 10.3 on my router-pc. For routing i
use pf.
I noticed that the routing/NAT-performance is in FreeBSD noticeable higher
than in OpenBSD. I think that is due to the SMP-support of pf in FreeBSD.
Is there also a SMP support (intended) in OpenBSD?
Regards
I got it to work exactly as you suggested using isakmpd.conf.
It took me quite a bit of searching to find the correct sort of syntax
for that file to achieve what I wanted but it now allows me to connect.
But I've run into another issue that I cannot resolve myself.
Once I connect from ANY clien
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Craig Skinner
wrote:
> A bloated way to do that is with an SQLite database, with a table's
> unique primary key being some (job number) attribute. Another column
> could auto timestamp on row insertion, so you could query on job number
> or time added. Unless you'
> From: "Pavan Maddamsetti"
> To: "misc"
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 10:55:28 PM
> Subject: Re: diff for help.1
>
> Why not ed?
vi(1) mentions ex(1) which is maybe good enough for a new user.
Both the "Welcome to OpenBSD" email message as well as help.1 reference man
and highlight the
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:29:24PM +0200, Jon S wrote:
>
> As a port of a backup solution, i needa a queue. Having looked around the
> net, i haven found any standard way (besides named pipes) that I can use.
>
Here's some shell scripting suggestions (which can be BASH specfic...)
http:
Hello,
Now that architectures without shared libraries aren't supported [1],
shouldn't the reference to them should be removed from library-specs(7)?
Index: library-specs.7
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man7/library-specs.7,v
r
23 matches
Mail list logo
