On 06/07/16(Wed) 06:53, Aaron Riekenberg wrote:
> Hi Martin -
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> It installed ok on my 5.9 stable system. patch failed to process it - I
> think because line numbers have changed. But it was not too difficult to
> install it manually.
Thanks, it has been committed an
Op Sat, 09 Jul 2016 14:10:26 +0200 schreef Matthias Apitz
:
dwiic at acpi0 not configured
dwiic at acpi0 not configured
What is connected to these?
--
Gemaakt met Opera's e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Hi,
I am relatively new to OpenBSD. I have installed my first virtualized KVM
guest and I look for a way to completely turn off the disk elevator, as the
guest is running on a server that uses Gentoo Linux as OS on the physical
server (having a HP SmartArray RAID controller).
There is no need for
One reliable solution, as usual, the simplest: run OpenBSD bare metal..
Le 2016-07-13 11:48, Christian Rößner a écrit :
Hi,
I am relatively new to OpenBSD. I have installed my first virtualized
KVM
guest and I look for a way to completely turn off the disk elevator, as
the
guest is running on a server that uses Gentoo Linux as OS on the
physical
server (having a
> Am 13.07.2016 um 12:22 schrieb Solène :
>
> Le 2016-07-13 11:48, Christian Rößner a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> I am relatively new to OpenBSD. I have installed my first virtualized KVM
>> guest and I look for a way to completely turn off the disk elevator, as
the
>> guest is running on a server that uses
> Hello, you should use virtio drivers for the disk in KVM.
Wasn't virtio(4) the default anyway at least on majority of KVM providers?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:39:14PM +0200, Christian Rner wrote:
> > Hello, you should use virtio drivers for the disk in KVM.
>
> I already use virtio ;-) But there is no need for the BSD kernel to do further
> scheduling.
I'm not at all there is a knob to twiddle here, but if there is, will
El d�a Wednesday, July 13, 2016 a las 10:45:47AM +0200, Boudewijn Dijkstra
escribi�:
> Op Sat, 09 Jul 2016 14:10:26 +0200 schreef Matthias Apitz
> :
> >
> >dwiic at acpi0 not configured
> >dwiic at acpi0 not configured
>
> What is connected to these?
I have here the various log, devinfo, lspci
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:48:31AM +0200, Christian Rner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am relatively new to OpenBSD. I have installed my first virtualized KVM
> guest and I look for a way to completely turn off the disk elevator, as the
> guest is running on a server that uses Gentoo Linux as OS on the
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:48 +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:39:14PM +0200, Christian Rner wrote:
> > > Hello, you should use virtio drivers for the disk in KVM.
> >
> > I already use virtio ;-) But there is no need for the BSD kernel to do
> > further
> > sch
> Am 13.07.2016 um 13:07 schrieb Mike Belopuhov :
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:48 +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:39:14PM +0200, Christian Rner wrote:
Hello, you should use virtio drivers for the disk in KVM.
>>>
>>> I already use virtio ;-) But there is
> Am 13.07.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Peter N. M. Hansteen :
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:39:14PM +0200, Christian Rner wrote:
>>> Hello, you should use virtio drivers for the disk in KVM.
>>
>> I already use virtio ;-) But there is no need for the BSD kernel to do
further
>> scheduling.
>
> I'm n
> On 13.07.2016, at 13:07, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:48 +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:39:14PM +0200, Christian Rner wrote:
Hello, you should use virtio drivers for the disk in KVM.
>>>
>>> I already use virtio ;-) But there is
Hi all,
We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS with
OpenBSD 5.9 amd64 on XenServer 7.0 (tested using bonnie++). The
virtual disks are LVM over iSCSI. Linux hosts get well over 100 MB/s
in both directions.
I'm assuming that this is because there is no disk driver for Xen yet,
> I had done lots of performance tests in the past and the more VMs you are
> running on a server, the more you will see latencies in disk IO. I found out
> that turning off the schedulers and also setting swappiness to a very low
> value, brings back performance.
To some extent.. where you start
> We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS with
> OpenBSD 5.9 amd64 on XenServer 7.0 (tested using bonnie++). The
> virtual disks are LVM over iSCSI. Linux hosts get well over 100 MB/s
> in both directions.
>
> I'm assuming that this is because there is no disk driver for Xen ye
Hi misc,
I'm getting the following error when using chrome. it only display's an
empty web page. Firefox and Xombrero works just fine.
Jul 13 21:17:42 x220 /bsd: chrome(36086): syscall 27 "recvfd"
Jul 13 21:17:42 x220 /bsd: chrome(86590): syscall 87 "stdio"
Jul 13 21:17:52 x220 /bsd: chrome(70183
> No reasonable way. If you really need more than 16, better use another
> OS.
I'd like to avoid using an other OS.
I'm still giving a try recompiling with NGROUPS_MAX et KI_NGROUPS
modified on a test computer ;-). Then I'll install samba from ports.
> As the net/samba port maintainer I thought
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Tinker wrote:
> On 2016-07-13 20:01, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
>> We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS
>
>
> What do you mean 70, you mean 70 000 IOPS?
Sadly, no. It was actually 95, I looked at the wrong column before:
Write (K/sec), %cpu,
On 2016-07-13 22:57, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Tinker wrote:
On 2016-07-13 20:01, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS
What do you mean 70, you mean 70 000 IOPS?
Sadly, no. It was actually 95, I looked at the wrong
Glenn Faustino [glenn.faust...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I'm getting the following error when using chrome. it only display's an
> empty web page. Firefox and Xombrero works just fine.
The kernel's internal pledge checks were improved.
This resulted in more pledges necessary from chromium
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> # egrep 'imt|ihi' cyapa-openbsd-dmesg-debug-DIHIDEV_DEBUG.txt
> Jul 13 09:12:19 openbsd /bsd: >>> probing for ihidev*
> Jul 13 09:12:19 openbsd /bsd: >>> ihidev probe returned 0
>
> The existing device is not found :-(
> On FreeBSD on the same netbook it is seen as:
>
> $
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Tinker wrote:
> On 2016-07-13 22:57, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Tinker wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-07-13 20:01, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What do yo
Thanks Chris!
On Wednesday, 13 July 2016, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Glenn Faustino [glenn.faust...@gmail.com ] wrote:
> > Hi misc,
> >
> > I'm getting the following error when using chrome. it only display's an
> > empty web page. Firefox and Xombrero works just fine.
>
> The kernel's internal p
On 2016-07-14 07:27, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
[...]
No, the tests are run sequentially. Write performance is measured
first (20 MB/s), then rewrite (12 MB/s), then read (37 MB/s), then
seeks (95 IOPS).
Okay, you are on a totally weird platform. Or, on an OK platform with a
totally weird configurat
I'm an intermediate OpenBSD user since 2001, but never needed my wifi
before.
When I connect to an open (no password) nwid it works fine, but when I try
to connect to one with a WPA2 password, it just fails with no clues I can
see. I'm using the correct password - (works fine on my phone, etc).
Do not trim your dmesg or config file to whatever you think is
necessary to show.
The OpenBSD version is a critical information for any serious
troubleshooting operation.
28 matches
Mail list logo