Re: OpenBSD Songs - License

On 08/05/16 13:32, 46rc1p+8qbgq1pcsq...@guerrillamail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just discovered the OpenBSD Songs, but unfortunately I can't > tell under which license they've been released. It would be really helpful if > you could update your website with this information > > - license

Re: github

On 08/07/16 08:44, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote: > Is this http://[bullshit deleted]/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site? I find this part terrifying. Nowhere on the OpenBSD website mentions github as anything official. So you just assumed that the seven letters, "openbsd", in that order,

ksh, ctrl-r followed by arrow key leaves "[D" or "[C" artifacts

I'll try to describe an annoyance with my ksh setup. Web and man page searching has not provided a solution. I'm relatively new to both ksh and openbsd. I'm on version 5.9 release. Problem happens when I navigate command history with ctrl-r, then use left or right arrow. Hitting left arrow

Re: opportunity to help: %s audit in mandoc

Hi Dariusz, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:27:07PM +0200: > OK, but from which branch? We don't use branches in OpenBSD. Just use the HEAD of the OpenBSD CVS repository. You don't need to worry about merging to the portable mandoc on mdocml.bsd.lv. That's a no-brainer

Re: opportunity to help: %s audit in mandoc

OK, but from which branch? Can the results be sent incrementally? 2016-08-07 19:57 GMT+02:00 Ingo Schwarze : > Hi, > > from time to time, people ask how they can help OpenBSD development > if they are new to that task. > > Right now, there is a useful opportunity. Take the

opportunity to help: %s audit in mandoc

Hi, from time to time, people ask how they can help OpenBSD development if they are new to that task. Right now, there is a useful opportunity. Take the code in /usr/src/usr.bin/mandoc/, grep(1) it for "%s", and audit all instances you find, figuring out whether they can be reached with the

Re: github

OpenBSD is using CVS solely, but for my own purposes I started to mirror src to github recently using cvs2gitdump tool. I do this since I find git log/git show more friendly than CVS provided tools... If you are interested see https://github.com/kgardas/openbsd-src -- CAVEAT! Do not trust the

Re: github

2016-08-07 18:42 GMT+02:00 Chris Bennett < chrisbenn...@bennettconstruction.us>: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:06:56AM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote: > > whereas on GitHub it would belong to a corporation. > > > > Doesn't that simply end the discussion right there? > > Yes. > This thread has been

Re: github

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:06:56AM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote: > whereas on GitHub it would belong to a corporation. > > Doesn't that simply end the discussion right there? Yes. This thread has been informative to me. Forget the silly move from CVS part, never was an issue. I did NOT know that

Re: github

> On 18:12 Sun 07 Aug, ludovic coues wrote: > > 2016-08-07 18:00 GMT+02:00 Consus : > > > On 10:56 Sun 07 Aug, Chris Bennett wrote: > > >> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > >> > Sign your commits with GPG. Looky, a link: > > >> > > > >> >

Re: github

>From all discussions: 1) a solution looking for a problem 2) the problems github tries to address are not considered urgent nor important problems by OpenBSD developers 3) migration cost/benefit is not worth it - and using 2 different methods of VC take away focus from the team". On Sunday, 7

Re: github

On 18:12 Sun 07 Aug, ludovic coues wrote: > 2016-08-07 18:00 GMT+02:00 Consus : > > On 10:56 Sun 07 Aug, Chris Bennett wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Consus wrote: > >> > Sign your commits with GPG. Looky, a link: > >> > > >> >

Re: github

2016-08-07 18:00 GMT+02:00 Consus : > On 10:56 Sun 07 Aug, Chris Bennett wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Consus wrote: >> > Sign your commits with GPG. Looky, a link: >> > >> > https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Signing-Your-Work >> > >> > Not that

Re: github

Ingo Schwarze wrote: Hi, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:44:58PM +0200: Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site? As one of the OpenBSD developers, i don't know and frankly i don't care. You certainly shouldn't trust it in any way. It seems

Re: github

On 10:56 Sun 07 Aug, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > Sign your commits with GPG. Looky, a link: > > > > https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Signing-Your-Work > > > > Not that hard, is it? > > > > OK, you win. > > Would you do me a

Re: github

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Consus wrote: > Sign your commits with GPG. Looky, a link: > > https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Signing-Your-Work > > Not that hard, is it? > OK, you win. Would you do me a favor first. Before this big move, could you make a commit to

Re: github

On 10:35 Sun 07 Aug, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 11:17:21AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +0300 > > > From: con...@gmx.com > > > To: > > misc@openbsd.org > > > Subject: Re: github > > > > > > > And github offers two-factor authentication, so

Re: github

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Donald Allen wrote: >> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +0300 >> From: con...@gmx.com >> To: > misc@openbsd.org >> Subject: Re: github >> >> On 16:43 Sun 07 Aug, Ingo Schwarze > wrote: Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source

Re: github

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 11:17:21AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +0300 > > From: con...@gmx.com > > To: > misc@openbsd.org > > Subject: Re: github > > > > And github offers two-factor authentication, so if enabled, not simple > to hack the account. > Github is

Re: github

> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +0300 > From: con...@gmx.com > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: github > > On 16:43 Sun 07 Aug, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >>> Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository >>> to github? >> >> Absolutely not. The OpenBSD repository will remain

Re: github

On 16:43 Sun 07 Aug, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository > > to github? > > Absolutely not. The OpenBSD repository will remain secure and > will not be outsourced to a random third party. I'm sorry, are we talking about the same OpenBSD CVS

Re: github

Hi, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:44:58PM +0200: > Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site? As one of the OpenBSD developers, i don't know and frankly i don't care. You certainly shouldn't trust it in any way. Personally, i consider github

Re: github

Thanks. Original message From: Mike Burns Date: 8/7/16 14:51 (GMT+01:00) To: Dariusz Sendkowski Cc: misc Subject: Re: github On 2016-08-07 14.44.58 +0200, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote: > Is this

Re: github

On 2016-08-07 14.44.58 +0200, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote: > Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site? > Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository to github? http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=134408828426309=2

github

Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site? Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository to github?

Re: acpiasus(4) not attached with EeePC 1000H on OpenBSD-current

On 29/07/2016 19:32, Dominique Goncalves wrote: My EeePC runs OpenBSD-current and works good. Since I updated the bios to the latest version, some hotkeys are not working as before. wireless and brightness hotkeys are working. standby and volume are not working. Since I have an Asus netbook I

Re: OpenBSD Songs - License

Agree with message, it would be good to have some message, is it the same licence like os or some different... also maybe melody or some tips how to playit on instruments ;)) On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:59 , <46rc1p+8qbgq1pcsq...@guerrillamail.com> wrote: > Edit: The website I was referring to is >