Re: Serving multiple domains on one machine or IP address

Hi Greg, I haven't done this myself, but take a look at the man pages of httpd.conf under the servers sections. You can create multiple a-records pointing to the same ip address, and then pick up the incoming traffic by inspecting the http header in order to find which virtual server to send the t

Re: Serving multiple domains on one machine or IP address

> On 19. Sep 2017, at 07:17, Greg Garrison wrote: > > Additionally I notice that the default client HTTP error messages (e.g. 404 > error) that HTTPD generates reveal that the server is running OpenBSD. This > is not a big deal but if the error messages were configurable so that they > cou

Serving multiple domains on one machine or IP address

Hi, I am interested if I can serve multiple domains from one machine using HTTPD and possibly VMM and RELAYD. I would prefer if there was a solution just with HTTPD is order to KISS. If it is really painful I'll just role more servers. I am running OpenBSD on a VPS. I have 3 to 5 web sites (

Vintage O'Reilly Books - OpenBSD Books

Looking to thin my book collection a bit. I have the following books I'm hoping to move to a better home: First Set: 1. Learning the Bash Shell, O'Reilly, 1st Edition, Oct 1995. 2. Mastering Regular Expressions, O'Reilly, 1st Edition, Nov 1997 printing 3. Programming Perl, O'Reilly, 2nd Editi

Re: softraid crypto seem really slower than plain ffs

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Joel Carnat wrote: > Hello, > > I was really annoyed by the numbers I got. So I did the testings again. > Using > a brand new VM. Being really careful on what I was doing and writing it > down > after each command run. I did the testings using 6.1 and 6.2-current

Re: reused group key update received

Hi, * Matthias Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > today I saw the following message in my logs browsing by: > > Sep 18 19:55:17 sigma /bsd: iwm0: reused group key update received from > 9c:c7:a6:56:3e:69 > > I remembered that this message has been added by stsp@ at August 17th > and he's interested in s

Re: OpenBSD's HTTPD troubles AGAIN - Can't find any man page that explains how to properly set up directory authentication.

Yeah, I'm not great at explaining stuff sometimes - but your spot on. Regards > Michael Hekeler writes: > >> Whats wrong with the manpage? >> >> [no] authenticate [realm] with htpasswd >> Authenticate a remote user for realm by checking the >> credentials against the user authentication file htp

Re: OpenBSD's HTTPD troubles AGAIN - Can't find any man page that explains how to properly set up directory authentication.

Thanks for the reply. This issue was worked out already thanks to another user on the misc board. I appreciate the info on the RFC, I never looked that up - I never even thought to tbh as was just trying to do it from the man page. Well, who knows - I just read that section of the man page qu

Re: OpenBSD's HTTPD troubles AGAIN - Can't find any man page that explains how to properly set up directory authentication.

Michael Hekeler writes: > Whats wrong with the manpage? > >[no] authenticate [realm] with htpasswd >Authenticate a remote user for realm by checking the >credentials against the user authentication file htpasswd. >The file name is relative to the chroot an

Re: OpenBSD's HTTPD troubles AGAIN - Can't find any man page that explains how to properly set up directory authentication.

Am Sat, 16 Sep 2017 08:35:59 -0400 schrieb "tec...@protonmail.com" : > You are a legend. Got it working with that! > > Thank you so much, saved me a bigger headache! > > p.s. Still, looking at the man page that really is not obvious where > it mentions [realm] and [htpasswd]. Whats wrong wit

reused group key update received

Hi, today I saw the following message in my logs browsing by: Sep 18 19:55:17 sigma /bsd: iwm0: reused group key update received from 9c:c7:a6:56:3e:69 I remembered that this message has been added by stsp@ at August 17th and he's interested in seeing this message. However, the message appeare

Re: softraid crypto seem really slower than plain ffs

Hello, I was really annoyed by the numbers I got. So I did the testings again. Using a brand new VM. Being really careful on what I was doing and writing it down after each command run. I did the testings using 6.1 and 6.2-current, in case there were some changes. There weren't. First of all

Problem IPSEC phase 2

Hi, I've been trying for days to close a tunnel with a client and I can not. Logs always appear: message_recv: cleartext phase 2 message dropped message from ipcliente port 500 due to notification type INVALID_FLAGS transport_send_messages: giving up on exchange peer-ipcliente, no response from p

Re: softraid crypto seem really slower than plain ffs

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 07:32:49PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > I'm not a developer but I know 6.1 moved to a shiny new side channel > resistant AES. I seem to remember Theo saying that if it is that slow > then even worse; people won't use encryption at all and if they need > side channel resis

Re: 6.1-stable: kernel panic on pf_state_key_unref()

Le 07/09/2017 à 05:59, Maxim Bourmistrov a écrit : Hey, Got kernel panic on 6.1-stable during ’rcctl restart relayd’. Sorry for PNG below. Hi, It has been fixed with this diff : http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/pf.c.diff?r1=1.1034&r2=1.1035