Re: PCEngines APU2 Wifi router issues

2017-12-22 Thread George
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:00:37 -0800 Carlos Cardenas wrote: > George wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:25:44 -0800 > > Carlos Cardenas wrote: > > > > > George wrote: > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > I got the apu2b4 to build a wifi router with an Intel Dual Band > > > > Wireless AC 7

Re: Why would you use make show rather than make -V in ports?

2017-12-22 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:57:27PM +, Thomas Levine wrote: > The normal port Makefile includes this "show" target. > > $ grep -A3 ^show: /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk > show: > .for _s in ${show} > @echo ${${_s}:Q} > .endfor > > Why would one use it rather than ma

Re: PCEngines APU2 Wifi router issues

2017-12-22 Thread Carlos Cardenas
George wrote: > On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:25:44 -0800 > Carlos Cardenas wrote: > > > George wrote: > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I got the apu2b4 to build a wifi router with an Intel Dual Band > > > Wireless AC 7260 wifi module. The module firmware was loaded by > > > fw_update at first boot a

Re: PCEngines APU2 Wifi router issues

2017-12-22 Thread George
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:25:44 -0800 Carlos Cardenas wrote: > George wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I got the apu2b4 to build a wifi router with an Intel Dual Band > > Wireless AC 7260 wifi module. The module firmware was loaded by > > fw_update at first boot and connecting to my existing AP work

Re: PCEngines APU2 Wifi router issues

2017-12-22 Thread George
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:25:44 -0800 Carlos Cardenas wrote: > George wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I got the apu2b4 to build a wifi router with an Intel Dual Band > > Wireless AC 7260 wifi module. The module firmware was loaded by > > fw_update at first boot and connecting to my existing AP work

Re: Why would you use make show rather than make -V in ports?

2017-12-22 Thread Vadim Zhukov
2017-12-23 1:57 GMT+03:00 Thomas Levine <_...@thomaslevine.com>: > The normal port Makefile includes this "show" target. > > $ grep -A3 ^show: /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk > show: > .for _s in ${show} > @echo ${${_s}:Q} > .endfor > > Why would one use it rather than ma

Why would you use make show rather than make -V in ports?

2017-12-22 Thread Thomas Levine
The normal port Makefile includes this "show" target. $ grep -A3 ^show: /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk show: .for _s in ${show} @echo ${${_s}:Q} .endfor Why would one use it rather than make -V?

Is it okay to clone OpenBSD from GitHub from India?

2017-12-22 Thread Dinesh Thirumurthy
Hi, "(NOTE: OpenBSD can not be re-exported from the US once it has entered the US. Because of this, take care NOT to get the distribution from a mirror server in the US if you are outside of Canada and the US.)" I am not in US/Canada. So is it okay to get OpenBSD source from GitHub? git clone h

Re: bug tracking system for OpenBSD

2017-12-22 Thread Mike
On 12/22/2017 11:26 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: > On 22/12/17 17:36, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> The important part is the data itself. >> ... >> IMHO if anything is going to happen with this it's going to come >> from someone who just gets on and does it. Maybe someone who just >> throws a sp

Re: Question on more concise httpd.conf setup for subdomain + https redirects

2017-12-22 Thread Andreas Thulin
Hi! I suppose you can script one config into ”httpd.foo.net”, another to ” httpd.bar.com” etc. and then include all individual files into httpd.conf with the keyword ”include”? BR, Andreas fre 22 dec. 2017 kl. 03:39 skrev Ryan Flannery : > Hi, I'm curious if there's a more concise/preferred wa

Re: bug tracking system for OpenBSD

2017-12-22 Thread Kapetanakis Giannis
On 22/12/17 17:36, Stuart Henderson wrote: > The important part is the data itself. > ... > IMHO if anything is going to happen with this it's going to come > from someone who just gets on and does it. Maybe someone who just > throws a spreadsheet or something together to keep track of > tech@/bug

Re: bug tracking system for OpenBSD

2017-12-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017-12-18, Kai Wetlesen wrote: > There are many decisions that would need to be made that will piss > somebody off. Decisions like what software/platform to use, where to > host the thing, and how much the tool should integrate into existing bug > reporting mechanisms (right now just fancy e

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

2017-12-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017-12-21, Robert Blacquiere wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 08:50:02AM +0300, kasak wrote: > >> > >> Look at the newest servers with aspeed ast2500, such as supermicro x11 >> platforms, they are manageable through html5. If you still need to manage >> your server try jdk-1.8.0.144v0.tgz p

X-forwarding cannot display Chinese ?

2017-12-22 Thread z_axis
In the OpenBSD box *$ grep -i x11 /etc/ssh/sshd_config* X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 X11UseLocalhost yes *$ xlsfonts* -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--0-0-75-75-c-0-iso8859-1 -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-100-100-100-c-60-iso8859-1 -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-22 Thread Florian Obser
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:20:16PM +, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > > I had to bypass relayd to roll prod stable. > Down to apache. Taking care of http and https. > By redirect. > Now this setup (if I can call it) is stable. > > . > > P.S. > Looks like we have to move forward from here. Buy an

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-22 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:33:23PM +, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > > 6.2-stable is NOT STABLE. > Backport, backport,backport. > > 6.2-stable is a beta release. > This is what its IS. > > 5.9 vs. 6.2 - last one is a major downwards. > I know a lot of stuff done in tcp/ip stack and this is a go