Le 25 juillet 2018 03:27:56 GMT+02:00, "樊 少冰" a écrit :
>Hello, OpenBSD developers.
>
>I like OpenBSD very much because of its security and stability.
>
>But, as an UNIX-like system, it has some traditional problem such as no
>integrated graphical operating environment (not means X but a completed
I have what I feel to be a profound idea that is in need of someone with a
strong resume. I have a patent. I want to use it to enable users to get
tested for sexually transmitted diseases, then use iris scanning
smartphones to compare their disease sets. There is a strong
epidemiological component
On 25.7.2018 03:49, 樊 少冰 wrote:
Hello, OpenBSD developers.
I like OpenBSD very much because of its security and stability.
Yeah sure.so much in to security and stability and picking up
Gnome.
So much that email comes from outlook.com . Known pros on proper
setups :-)
https://bsdly
Hello Sobin
I dont use gnome but
Xfce is a light enough destop enviornment ...it works well in openbsd
Check the following video to help you
https://youtu.be/oC5D9fenQBs
There are videos and guides on gnome and openbsd but i havent used it /them
to make a comment
Cwm is quite popular amongst oth
I will beat others to the punch and say you were looking for Ubuntu not OpenBSD.
OpenBSD is plenty easy to use, but the type of easy to use you describe with a
full desktop environment is not the target.
However installing gnome is simple enough. Several sites exist describing it. I
am guessing f
Hello, OpenBSD developers.
I like OpenBSD very much because of its security and stability.
But, as an UNIX-like system, it has some traditional problem such as no
integrated graphical operating environment (not means X but a completed desktop
environment system like Gnome). So, I tried to insta
Hello, OpenBSD developers.
I like OpenBSD very much because of its security and stability.
But, as an UNIX-like system, it has some traditional problem such as no
integrated graphical operating environment (not means X but a completed desktop
environment system like Gnome). So, I tried to insta
Correction, it's an E17k. The E17 should work too, though.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 3:02 AM, Sterling Archer wrote:
> I have an FiiO E17 that works out of the box on OpenBSD, and it has
> coaxial spdif input.
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Diana Eichert wrote:
>> ok, answered my own quest
I have an FiiO E17 that works out of the box on OpenBSD, and it has
coaxial spdif input.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Diana Eichert wrote:
> ok, answered my own question by grep'ng within /usr/share/man/man4,
> looks like azalia(4) systems. Was hoping for something usb attached
> but no su
ok, answered my own question by grep'ng within /usr/share/man/man4,
looks like azalia(4) systems. Was hoping for something usb attached
but no such luck.
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Diana Eichert wrote:
I'm trying to connect to an audio system that only has SPDIF output.
I looked at man pages but no
You need it licensed to export each product type. Even if it has come from
abroad you then need it licensed to export it back out, lol.
On 07-24 11:50, Chris Bennett wrote:
> What is going on overall with the US and cryptography?
> I recently joined an organization that has legitimate concerns about
> privacy, so I thought I'd ask those who know and have history with this
> issue.
I am definitely not any kind of expert on this (in
I'm trying to connect to an audio system that only has SPDIF output.
I looked at man pages but nothing obvious regarding supported audio
devices with SPDIF input support.
Anyone have recommendations? Or is it supported?
thanks
diana
Hi Chris,
Im not a Lawyer,
But basically you cant export cryptographic technology from the US,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_States
If you want to ship a firewall to an overseas office (for a VPN) Im not
certain it would
constitute exporting. as you are not
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 3:15 PM, Pascal de Kloe wrote:
> Fulltime work on a port definitely qualifies as a serious attempt. It
> is almost impossible to say for sure you can manage such a port. All I
> want is that this beauty is actively used for OpenBSD. Otherwise I'll
> keep it for my own de
Actually, POWER9 is bi-endian and can switch between BE and LE at runtime. BE
actually has a very slight performance advantage in some cases. Linux is the
only OS that appears to be doing much LE stuff on POWER, other OS development
that I'm aware of is all BE focused.
I know that Timothy Pears
Fulltime work on a port definitely qualifies as a serious attempt. It
is almost impossible to say for sure you can manage such a port. All I
want is that this beauty is actively used for OpenBSD. Otherwise I'll
keep it for my own developments or reuse the CPUs in a Thalos
workstation if that's even
Hi,
I'm working on a powerpc64 port, I've been at it 2 weeks non-stop. I
don't know if I'll finish. But I gotta say hey! this is a generous offer.
Since I'm focusing on the big endian machine byte order and on PowerPC
970's it would need to be ported again to little endian afaik. If it's
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:27:44PM +0200, Pascal de Kloe wrote:
> I'm offering my brand new IBM 9006-22P with two 16-core 2.9GHZ CPUs to
> the OpenBSD project for free. Who can make the hardware port happen?
> Serious attempts only.
Sounds like strings attached.
I don't watch any news on TV and for the most part only read headlines
that show up on my phone despite the fact I don't want them.
What is going on overall with the US and cryptography?
I recently joined an organization that has legitimate concerns about
privacy, so I thought I'd ask those who kn
I'm offering my brand new IBM 9006-22P with two 16-core 2.9GHZ CPUs to
the OpenBSD project for free. Who can make the hardware port happen?
Serious attempts only.
I just got feedback that the next snapshot should fix it - I will post an
update if the problem
persists.
/Robert
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:36:29 +0200
Robert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to install today's (24.7.) amd64 snapshot on two machines.
> Both simply rebooted during the kernel init, i.e.,
Hi,
I tried to install today's (24.7.) amd64 snapshot on two machines.
Both simply rebooted during the kernel init, i.e., when booting
install.fs/iso (tried with USB and CD).
(amd64/6.3 worked fine.)
On one I was able to connect a serial port; output below.
/Robert
OpenBSD 6.3-current (RAMDISK
Hello,
I m trying to use divert-to and Perl to manage in one place incoming packet,
keeping the destination address intact
As man says :
--
divert-to host port port Used to redirect packets to a local socket
bound to host and port. The packets will not be modified, so
getsockname(2) on the socke
Sorry for the replies in quick succession, I just wanted to thank you- yup,
those commands got "mtrace" to appear! :D
Now all I have to do is configure the bgplg.h file to make the mtrace
command work properly, should be easy peasy
Thanks again dude!
--
Sent from: http://openbsd-archive.7691
Thank you for the reply,
Okay that's good to know- I'm getting a couple errors but I can probably
iron them out. So do I need to do that set of commands every time I add
something new to the "bgplg.c" file? Should those commands detect "mtrace"
automatically or do I need to do something else?
Tha
MonsieurFugu(aleks.mcallis...@gmail.com) on 2018.07.24 03:48:11 -0700:
> > It is not clear whether you rebuilt bgplg or not.
> > Also mtrace binary needs to be built statically.
>
> I restarted the console and used the following commands;
> # /etc/rc.d/httpd start
> # /etc/rc.d/bgpd start
> But I
24.07.2018 15:58, Zé Loff пишет:
This is a more or less well known issue. At the bootloader prompt issue
boot -c and then
UKC> disable pcppi
UKC> exit
And it'll (hopefully) boot properly. I have the same problem with an
ASUS H270-PRO mainboard + Intel i7-7700K
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:13:10PM +0300, kasak wrote:
>
>
> 24.07.2018 14:30, kasak пишет:
> >
> >
> > 24.07.2018 14:18, Otto Moerbeek пишет:
> > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 02:07:15PM +0300, kasak wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 24.07.2018 10:24, kasak пишет:
> > > > > Hello everybody.
> > > >
24.07.2018 14:30, kasak пишет:
24.07.2018 14:18, Otto Moerbeek пишет:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 02:07:15PM +0300, kasak wrote:
24.07.2018 10:24, kasak пишет:
Hello everybody.
I'm trying to install OpenBSD 6.3 on softraid.
My configuration is simple:
Asus z170-k motherboard, with i7-670
> It is not clear whether you rebuilt bgplg or not.
> Also mtrace binary needs to be built statically.
I restarted the console and used the following commands;
# /etc/rc.d/httpd start
# /etc/rc.d/bgpd start
But I don't think that "rebuilt" the BGPLG. How do I do that?
Okay yeah I definitely didn'
24.07.2018 14:18, Otto Moerbeek пишет:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 02:07:15PM +0300, kasak wrote:
24.07.2018 10:24, kasak пишет:
Hello everybody.
I'm trying to install OpenBSD 6.3 on softraid.
My configuration is simple:
Asus z170-k motherboard, with i7-6700 cpu, and 16 gb ram. no external
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 02:07:15PM +0300, kasak wrote:
>
>
> 24.07.2018 10:24, kasak пишет:
> > Hello everybody.
> >
> > I'm trying to install OpenBSD 6.3 on softraid.
> >
> > My configuration is simple:
> >
> > Asus z170-k motherboard, with i7-6700 cpu, and 16 gb ram. no external
> > vga or
24.07.2018 10:24, kasak пишет:
Hello everybody.
I'm trying to install OpenBSD 6.3 on softraid.
My configuration is simple:
Asus z170-k motherboard, with i7-6700 cpu, and 16 gb ram. no external
vga or other cards, just this.
I have 2 similar 750 gb disks.
I have succesfully booted bsd.rd
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:15 AM Damien Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible for pf to match traffic that has not been tagged?
> It seems possible to match a tag, or traffic that lacks a particular tag
> but I can't see any way to match traffic that has no tag at all?
>
> Any clues?
>
> Context:
Hi,
Is it possible for pf to match traffic that has not been tagged?
It seems possible to match a tag, or traffic that lacks a particular tag
but I can't see any way to match traffic that has no tag at all?
Any clues?
Context: I'd like to tag at input particular traffic for specific
outbound pro
24.07.2018 10:32, Indunil Jayasooriya пишет:
This may help you.
http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/raid
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:54 PM, kasak wrote:
Hello everybody.
I'm trying to install OpenBSD 6.3 on softraid.
My configuration is simple:
Asus z170-k motherboard, with i7-6700 cpu, and
This may help you.
http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/raid
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:54 PM, kasak wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
> I'm trying to install OpenBSD 6.3 on softraid.
>
> My configuration is simple:
>
> Asus z170-k motherboard, with i7-6700 cpu, and 16 gb ram. no external vga
> or other
Hello everybody.
I'm trying to install OpenBSD 6.3 on softraid.
My configuration is simple:
Asus z170-k motherboard, with i7-6700 cpu, and 16 gb ram. no external
vga or other cards, just this.
I have 2 similar 750 gb disks.
I have succesfully booted bsd.rd in uefi mode, then with shell i di
39 matches
Mail list logo