Re: wsmouse: disable touch-panel

2019-06-10 Thread Benny
Have you tried adding: Option "Ignore" "true" in the xorg input section for your touchscreen? Something like in xorg.conf or a config file in xorg.conf.d: Section "InputClass" Identifier "NO touch" Driver "some driver" MatchIsTouchscreen "on" Option "Ignore"

Re: wsmouse: disable touch-panel

2019-06-10 Thread Aaron Mason
Found an approach that might be worth considering: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=155751021025538=2 On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 1:07 PM Aaron Mason wrote: > > I had a similar issue with a Surface Pro 3 with a faulty touch screen > running Windaz, the solution was to disable the USB input device

Re: wsmouse: disable touch-panel

2019-06-10 Thread Aaron Mason
I had a similar issue with a Surface Pro 3 with a faulty touch screen running Windaz, the solution was to disable the USB input device for the touch screen. On OpenBSD, you could try using "boot -c" at boot to remove wsmouse[123] device from the kernel (see https://man.openbsd.org/config for

dhcpd and Polycom SoundPoint IP 550 phones

2019-06-10 Thread Peter Fraser
Using OpenBSD 6.5 (GENERIC.MP) #3: Sat Apr 13 14:48:43 MDT 2019 When booting the phone, the OpenBSD dhcp always cause the phone to give a message "dhcp error" and the phone get no IP address. After several days of desperation as to the cause of the error it tried the isc-dhcp-server from

Re: wsmouse: disable touch-panel

2019-06-10 Thread frantisek holop
Timothy Brown - Mon, 10 June 2019 at 08:43:47 > Not too sure about a a config change to disable it. However on my crappy > work Dell laptop (XPS 9343), I can disable it in the BIOS. Have you looked > to see if you can do that? yes. it's not there. the bios is a sad piece of software in this

Re: IPsec bandwidth perf on APU4C4

2019-06-10 Thread mabi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, June 10, 2019 7:09 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > No "auth". AES-GCM is an authenticated encryption algorithm, i.e., > it handles both encryption and authentication at the same time. > Specifying an additional "auth" algorithm doesn't make sense.

Re: IPsec bandwidth perf on APU4C4

2019-06-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber
mabi: > > enc aes-128-gcm etc. > > That part for the "enc" parameter makes sense to me but what about the "auth" > parameter? No "auth". AES-GCM is an authenticated encryption algorithm, i.e., it handles both encryption and authentication at the same time. Specifying an additional "auth"

Re: IPsec bandwidth perf on APU4C4

2019-06-10 Thread mabi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, June 10, 2019 6:00 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > enc aes-128-gcm etc. That part for the "enc" parameter makes sense to me but what about the "auth" parameter? Would you keep the default hmac-sha2-256? or which combination with the "enc

Re: Michael MIC failure with CCMP

2019-06-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 05:33:43PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing regular "Michael MIC failure" syslog message in my > /var/log/messages. > > Jun 10 16:17:47 clyde /bsd: athn0: Michael MIC failure > Jun 10 16:18:03 clyde /bsd: athn0: Michael MIC failure > Jun 10 16:28:44

Re: IPsec bandwidth perf on APU4C4

2019-06-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber
mabi: > Thanks for the tip regarding the cpu cost of the authentication algorithm. > Now I was wondering how do you use the AES-GCM combo? I can't find any auth > or enc parameters mentioning that combo. enc aes-128-gcm etc. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber

Michael MIC failure with CCMP

2019-06-10 Thread Sebastien Marie
Hi, I am seeing regular "Michael MIC failure" syslog message in my /var/log/messages. Jun 10 16:17:47 clyde /bsd: athn0: Michael MIC failure Jun 10 16:18:03 clyde /bsd: athn0: Michael MIC failure Jun 10 16:28:44 clyde /bsd: athn0: Michael MIC failure Jun 10 16:33:03 clyde /bsd: athn0: Michael

Re: IPsec bandwidth perf on APU4C4

2019-06-10 Thread mabi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, June 10, 2019 4:49 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > It helps to understand that the authentication algorithm can require > as much or more CPU than the encryption. HMAC-SHA2 is expensive. > On hardware that has AES-NI support, like the APU2 family,

network io

2019-06-10 Thread Gustavo Rios
Hi folks, is there anyone using obsd with dell servers using 50Gb/s network card ? Or even 10 Gb/s ? What do you heave to report ? Thanks to share your experience.! -- Pag Bem Fácil Ltda www.pagbemfacil.com.br

Re: IPsec bandwidth perf on APU4C4

2019-06-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2019-06-10, mabi wrote: > Bypassing the IPsec tunnel I get around 500 Mbit/s of bandwidth throughput > which is quite satisfying. The bandwidth throughput over my IPsec tunnel > achieves a max of 80 Mbit/s which I was sort of expecting with the default > encryption settings (auth

Re: wsmouse: disable touch-panel

2019-06-10 Thread Timothy Brown
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 03:43:34PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > hello, > > i have a faulty touch panel in this notebook and i need to disable it. > because of KARL and following -current in general i'd much prefer a non > config -e solution. that leaves wscons and X.org. > > if i read Xorg

wsmouse: disable touch-panel

2019-06-10 Thread frantisek holop
hello, i have a faulty touch panel in this notebook and i need to disable it. because of KARL and following -current in general i'd much prefer a non config -e solution. that leaves wscons and X.org. if i read Xorg log file correctly, x.org picks up touch panel from wsmouse. after reading

IPsec bandwidth perf on APU4C4

2019-06-10 Thread mabi
Hi, I am currently testing a PC Engines APU4C4 with OpenBSD 6.5 and iked for an IPsec tunnnel between two sites which both have 1 Gbit/s uplink. Bypassing the IPsec tunnel I get around 500 Mbit/s of bandwidth throughput which is quite satisfying. The bandwidth throughput over my IPsec tunnel

Re: bad-ip-version 6

2019-06-10 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
> On 9. Jun 2019, at 19:41, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2019/06/07 23:42, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: >> >> >>> On 7. Jun 2019, at 22:38, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> >>> On 2019-06-07, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: Hi list, Doing tcpdump(8) on a wireguard tunnel yields: