Re: OpenBSD smtpd to GoDaddy

2020-04-26 Thread Thomas Bohl
Am 26.04.2020 um 19:15 schrieb Philip Munts: I'm trying to send email from OpenBSD 6.6 via GoDaddy's smtp.secureserver.net.  Unfortunately my GoDaddy SMTP username is "p...@munts.net" which doesn't seem to be a legal username for OpenBSD's smtpd.  I've tried every escaping mechanism for the @

OpenBSD smtpd to GoDaddy

2020-04-26 Thread Philip Munts
I'm trying to send email from OpenBSD 6.6 via GoDaddy's smtp.secureserver.net. Unfortunately my GoDaddy SMTP username is "p...@munts.net" which doesn't seem to be a legal username for OpenBSD's smtpd. I've tried every escaping mechanism for the @ character I can think of, but nothing has

Re: couldn't find audio device

2020-04-26 Thread Damien Thiriet
Hi, Thanks to your answers, I managed to record sounds using my webcam, connecting to rsnd device and, more important, I think I understood why aucat couldn't find the device earlier. I overlooked man sndio (7) because I misunderstood man sndiod (8) and tried to connect to /dev/ instead of

Re: Ospfd default route query

2020-04-26 Thread Richard Chivers
Not sure how I missed the clear information in the man page... "If set to default, a default route pointing to this router will be announced over OSPF" It seems I am just having an issue and it should work as I expected. I will do some more diagnosis in the morning... On Sun, 26 Apr 2020,

multihomed routing issue

2020-04-26 Thread 4642
Hi, I have created a OpenBSD 6.6 VM in the Azures cloud that I plan to use as a Firewall, I had planned on using carp but I can't get it working in Azure so I think I can use an Internal load balancer to achieve my aim of having two redundany OBSD Firewalls in Azure. The problem I have is that

Ospfd default route query

2020-04-26 Thread Richard Chivers
Hi, Hope someone can help, I am having a strange issue and can't seem to isolate the problem. We have "redistribute default" set globally on our bgp/ibgp speakers in the ospfd.conf. The bsd boxes are all 6.6. These routers are connected via ibgp to some other routers and have external bgp

Re: pf rules vs late pppoe0 setup

2020-04-26 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 13:54:27 +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > Is there a recommended way to deal with this? If I correctly understood your problem, the solution: (from pf.conf(5)) > Host name resolution and interface to address translation are > done at ruleset load-time. When the address of an

Re: /bin/sh echo \n

2020-04-26 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Martijn van Duren wrote on Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:52:38PM +0200: > On 4/26/20 12:27 PM, Thomas de Grivel wrote: >> Second I don't see this feature described neither in man sh nor man >> ksh so is it a known behaviour of ksh ? > from echo(1): > echo does not support any of the backslash

pf rules vs late pppoe0 setup

2020-04-26 Thread Jan Stary
This is current/amd64 on an APU2. The machine is connected via pppoe over vlan over em as follows: $ ifconfig em0 em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 lladdr 00:0d:b9:56:5e:fc index 1 priority 0 llprio 3 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex) status: active $

Re: /bin/sh echo \n

2020-04-26 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:04:05PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:27:24PM +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I was testing some scripting using /bin/sh and I could not find this > > behaviour in the documentation : > > > > > $ /bin/sh > > > $ echo -n

Re: /bin/sh echo \n

2020-04-26 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:27:24PM +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote: > Hello, > > I was testing some scripting using /bin/sh and I could not find this > behaviour in the documentation : > > > $ /bin/sh > > $ echo -n '\n' > > > > $ > > It seems that ksh even in sh (posix ?) mode does expansion of

Re: /bin/sh echo \n

2020-04-26 Thread Martijn van Duren
On 4/26/20 12:27 PM, Thomas de Grivel wrote: > Hello, > > I was testing some scripting using /bin/sh and I could not find this > behaviour in the documentation : > >> $ /bin/sh >> $ echo -n '\n' >> >> $ > > It seems that ksh even in sh (posix ?) mode does expansion of \n to an > actual

/bin/sh echo \n

2020-04-26 Thread Thomas de Grivel
Hello, I was testing some scripting using /bin/sh and I could not find this behaviour in the documentation : > $ /bin/sh > $ echo -n '\n' > > $ It seems that ksh even in sh (posix ?) mode does expansion of \n to an actual newline. First is there a way to turn off the \n expansion in simple