Re: mfs reported full, but empty

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:47:57 +0200, Vincent wrote: > After several days, I have to reboot my machine because of mfs full. This is > not the first time. > I have few mfs on this machine, but I observe that this is always a full > filesystem on /tmp after +40 days of uptime. > But on other mfs,

Re: mfs reported full, but empty

On 2020-08-19 17:47, Vincent wrote: > Hello, > > > After several days, I have to reboot my machine because of mfs full. This is > not the first time. > I have few mfs on this machine, but I observe that this is always a full > filesystem on /tmp after +40 days of uptime. > But on other mfs,

Re: i386, parallel port permission error?

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:09 AM Doug Moss wrote: > On 2020-08-17, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >On 2020-08-17, Doug Moss wrote: > >> > >> Did something change at OpenBSD i386 between 5.9 and 6.0 > >> related to parallel port / lpt hardware permissions? > >> > >> Up to OpenBSD i386 5.9, > >> I used

Re: httpd - bypass tls misconfig different ciphers, ecdhe

On Wed, August 19, 2020 3:33 am, Hisacro Root wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 09:28:18PM -0400, trondd wrote: >> The bug here is in how additional listen lines interact with the >> remaining >> configuration. The first listen line in a server block gets the tls >> block >> and it doesn't get

mfs reported full, but empty

Hello, After several days, I have to reboot my machine because of mfs full. This is not the first time. I have few mfs on this machine, but I observe that this is always a full filesystem on /tmp after +40 days of uptime. But on other mfs, I have very low filesystem activity. Am I the

No watchdog detected (IT8613)

Hello All, can someone tell me if the watchdog in IT8613 Super IO chip is supported. I'm trying to setup a router with openBSD 6.7 (stable) and I would love to have the watchdog up and running, yet I can't see the watchdog in dmesg(see below). When I activate the watchdog in bios, the

Re: i386, parallel port permission error?

On 2020-08-17, Stuart Henderson wrote: >On 2020-08-17, Doug Moss wrote: >> >> Did something change at OpenBSD i386 between 5.9 and 6.0 >> related to parallel port / lpt hardware permissions? >> >> Up to OpenBSD i386 5.9, >> I used to be able to have a working case-LCD-screen >> with

Re: cwm without a mouse

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020, Jacqueline Jolicoeur wrote: > Hi, > > This may be a strange question, but does anyone use cwm without a mouse? > I use cwm and only use the mouse for the browser. -- Paco Esteban. 0x5818130B8A6DBC03

Re: httpd - bypass tls misconfig different ciphers, ecdhe

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 09:28:18PM -0400, trondd wrote: > The bug here is in how additional listen lines interact with the remaining > configuration. The first listen line in a server block gets the tls block > and it doesn't get applied to the second listen line. Except for certs > and keys

cwm without a mouse

Hi, This may be a strange question, but does anyone use cwm without a mouse?

Re: anyone running a Thinkpad T15 Gen1 with 4k display

Hi Tom, I've been looking at the same machine. Note that for the last ~5 years all laptops with Intel CPUs and Nvidia GPUs have their external display adapters physically routed through the Nvidia GPU. I have not seen verofication for this model yet, please report if you see any proof on this.

Re: smtpd returns 'TempFail' and 'No route to destination' when using localhost as source behind NAT

As I know, table sources is needed to bind smtpd to an interface while mail sending, but table helonames is for session IP=name. sorces != helonames in my particular configuration. So it doesn't work for me. smtpd should bind to local interface like localhost or another interface on local