On 12/13/20 8:32 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If a pflogd dies because of a bug, the pid listed in the file may be
reused, and then your kill `cat pidfile` will kill the incorrect process.
I understand your concern, but as written before, I am not asking to drop
pkill support.
How about adding a
>> On 2020-12-13, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 12/13/20 7:10 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>> And I'm suggesting the arguments should look like this:
>>
>> pflogd: [priv] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
>> pflogd: [running] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
>>
>> That mi
December 13, 2020 6:26 PM, "Chris Bennett"
wrote:
> I have run into a problem with an organization getting a senderscore of
> 0.
> This is not at all a spam source, but a political organization which is
> the kiss of death these days.
>
> What's the right method to deal with this? I certainly d
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 08:24:13PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-12-13, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > On 12/13/20 7:10 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>
> >> And I'm suggesting the arguments should look like this:
> >>
> >> pflogd: [priv] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
> >>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 08:45:53PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> You should probably look into the bypass keyword, it lets you create a
> filter rule that will bypass a phase (ie: in phase connect, if ip addr
> is X, then bypass the phase).
>
> Gilles
>
Thanks!
Chris
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:34:35 - (UTC), Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2020-12-12, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > I've been using a LACP trunk on my apu (with the three em(4)). On
> > top of which I have some vlans. I've been doing that for years and
> > it's working fine.
>
> I used load-balancing
On 2020-12-12, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> I've been using a LACP trunk on my apu (with the three em(4)). On
> top of which I have some vlans. I've been doing that for years and it's
> working fine.
I used load-balancing trunk on APU before but stopped when I came to the
conclusion that APU running Op
On 2020-12-13, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 12/13/20 7:10 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>> And I'm suggesting the arguments should look like this:
>>
>> pflogd: [priv] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
>> pflogd: [running] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
>>
>> That mi
On 2020-12-13, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I have run into a problem with an organization getting a senderscore of
> 0.
> This is not at all a spam source, but a political organization which is
> the kiss of death these days.
>
> What's the right method to deal with this? I certainly don't want to
> st
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:42:20PM +0300, Consus wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 08:27:24PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
At least OpenBSD is not alone with this problem. On Debian there
is a tool "/bin/pidof", trying to guess the pid of a daemon to kill
by looking at the process list as well.
So
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 08:27:24PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
At least OpenBSD is not alone with this problem. On Debian there
is a tool "/bin/pidof", trying to guess the pid of a daemon to kill
by looking at the process list as well.
Some dude from Google came up with a good solution (for Lin
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 12/13/20 7:10 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > And I'm suggesting the arguments should look like this:
> >
> > pflogd: [priv] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
> > pflogd: [running] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
> >
> > That might allow
On 12/13/20 7:10 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
And I'm suggesting the arguments should look like this:
pflogd: [priv] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
pflogd: [running] -s 160 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd)
That might allow more accurate pkill targetting.
Wouldn't you
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 12/7/20 7:19 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Yep.
> >
> > It is possible we need a better strategy --- like placing *all* original
> > argv in the [priv] title.
> >
>
> If you change the pflogd command line in the process list, what is
> supposed to happen to the existing
I have run into a problem with an organization getting a senderscore of
0.
This is not at all a spam source, but a political organization which is
the kiss of death these days.
What's the right method to deal with this? I certainly don't want to
stop senderscore filtering, but I do want to receive
Hello,
I just got a Teclast F7 Plus laptop and installed OpenBSD 6.8-current on
it. Most things works except apm and touchpad.
Using zzz or ZZZ, it seems suspend/hibernation start but are never
achieved. The backlight keyboard and power led are still on. On Linux,
keyboard goes black and pow
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 11:00:32 +0100, livio wrote:
> # cat /etc/hostname.aggr0
> trunkport em1 trunkport em2 trunkport em3 lacpmode active lacptimeout
> slow description "i_data"
> up
I just tried adding "lacpmode active lacptimeout slow" in case
ifconfig(8) was lying and they were not the default
On 12/7/20 7:19 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Yep.
It is possible we need a better strategy --- like placing *all* original
argv in the [priv] title.
If you change the pflogd command line in the process list, what is
supposed to happen to the existing code using pkill or pgrep, expecting
the *old*
Hey,
My setup at home is almost identical. APU with aggr interface and a couple of
VLANs:
https://github.com/liv-io/ansible-playbooks-example/blob/master/bsd/host_vars/fw01.example.com.yml
# cat /etc/hostname.em{1,2,3}
up
# cat /etc/hostname.aggr0
trunkport em1 trunkport em2 trunkport em3 lacpm
Hello,
For your use case make sure from reading softraid it will fit your needs
in the first place, perform some tests to make sure softraid meets what
you need.
Otherwise have a look at hardware raids which OpenBSD supports.
As far as NAS for local, yes OpenBSD's perfect for the job, I've
20 matches
Mail list logo
