Buying a New Laptop

2021-01-09 Thread Coppock, Patrick H
Hi, I'm thinking about getting a new laptop, and I want to get something with good OpenBSD support. I know ThinkPads have had good support historically, and I'm wondering if that holds for recent machines. In particular, I've been eyeing the L13. Does anyone have a similar machine running

Buying a New Laptop

2021-01-09 Thread Coppock, Patrick H
Hi, I'm thinking about getting a new laptop, and I want to get something with good OpenBSD support. I know ThinkPads have had good support historically, and I'm wondering if that holds for recent machines. In particular, I've been eyeing the L13. Does anyone have a similar machine running

really pleased with openbsd68/rpi4 8GB installation/performance

2021-01-09 Thread tech-lists
Thank you to everyone who helped make openbsd work on the rpi4. Although I won't be needing xorg/x11 on this particular machine, I tried installing it anyway out of curiosity and was surprised how easy it was to get it all working. I thought firefox might bog it down but no. Very smooth.

Re: Suggestion for small improvement in acme-client.conf.5

2021-01-09 Thread Wolf
Hello, On 2021-01-09 22:20:26 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021-01-09, Wolf wrote: > > I have small suggestion for improving man page for acme-client.conf.5. > > Basically just adding "comma separated" to clarify on the format of the > > list for alternative names. I had to dig into the

Re: Suggestion for small improvement in acme-client.conf.5

2021-01-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021-01-09, Wolf wrote: > I have small suggestion for improving man page for acme-client.conf.5. > Basically just adding "comma separated" to clarify on the format of the > list for alternative names. I had to dig into the parser.y to figure > this out, so it would be nice to have it

Suggestion for small improvement in acme-client.conf.5

2021-01-09 Thread Wolf
Hello, I have small suggestion for improving man page for acme-client.conf.5. Basically just adding "comma separated" to clarify on the format of the list for alternative names. I had to dig into the parser.y to figure this out, so it would be nice to have it documented. diff --git

Re: cmp(1) '-s' flag ignoring byte offset argument?

2021-01-09 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:05:31AM -0800, William Ahern wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 07:09:01PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > I've noticed some surprising behaviour from cmp(1) when using the '-s' > > flag. > > > > It appears that cmp -s is ignoring the byte offset

Re: cmp(1) '-s' flag ignoring byte offset argument?

2021-01-09 Thread William Ahern
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:05:31AM -0800, William Ahern wrote: > Interestingly, DragonflyBSD and FreeBSD already do it this way[3][4], yet I > can confirm FreeBSD still has the problem. (DragonflyBSD has nearly > identical code.) But that implementation duplicates the short-circuit, along > with

Re: cmp(1) '-s' flag ignoring byte offset argument?

2021-01-09 Thread William Ahern
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 07:09:01PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > Hey folks, > > I've noticed some surprising behaviour from cmp(1) when using the '-s' > flag. > > It appears that cmp -s is ignoring the byte offset arguments I'm giving > it. > Not sure what to make of this, I noticed this