HI,
Yes, on my em0 interface I am using ‘dhcp’ and this is the source IP for pflow.
The setup is a basic firewall as described in the PF example firewall.
Interface em0 = external using dhcp (Static IP assigned by carrier)
Interface em1 = internal with static IP (Lan using 10.0.x.x/24)
Output
HI,
I am getting this error since upgrading to v7.0;
pf enabled
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 0 -> 1
net.inet6.ip6.forwarding: 0 -> 1
starting network
ifconfig: SIOCSETPFLOW: Can't assign requested address
ifconfig: SIOCSETPFLOW: Can't assign requested address
reordering libraries: done.
starting ear
It's not documented in the `sysupgrade` manpage.
My setup is a little bit unusual, and I'm trying to understand why
`uname -a` is still reporting 6.9 after I successfully booted
bsd.upgrade and saw the upgrade process scroll past.
> On Oct 15, 2021, at 7:09 PM, Antonino Sidoti wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> I am getting this error since upgrading to v7.0;
>
> pf enabled
> net.inet.ip.forwarding: 0 -> 1
> net.inet6.ip6.forwarding: 0 -> 1
> starting network
>
> ifconfig: SIOCSETPFLOW: Can't assign requested address
> ifconfig: SI
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:09:16 -0400, Jon Fineman wrote:
> I was preparing the dmesg to send off and I noticed it looks like the
> old message from 6.9. How could that occur? What did I miss?
>From dmesg(8):
On some systems the message buffer can survive reboot and be
retained (in the hope
I was on 6.9 release, and I did a sysupgrade, which went smooth. Did a sysmerge
and pkg_add -u.
uuname gives me the expected output:
desktop(~/nuc)$: uname -a
OpenBSD desktop.xxx.com 7.0 GENERIC.MP#232 amd64
I was preparing the dmesg to send off and I noticed it looks like the old
message fr
> On Oct 15, 2021, at 3:19 PM, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
>
> My setup is a little bit unusual,
Unfortunately you have uttered the magic words that will dissuade most people
on the list from helping you. sysupgrade is only designed to work for people
whose setup is not at all unusual. I
On 2021-10-15, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 08:05:08PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> [ some cut ]
>
>> > Anything else I can collect.
>>
>> You might want to compile and install nsd wit debug symbols info:
>>
>> cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd
>> make -f Makefile.bsd-wra
On 2021-10-15, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:47:22PM +0200, Mischa wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2021-10-15 19:42, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:16:55PM +0200, Mischa wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 2021-10-15 18:27, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > The actual prob
Avon Robertson [avo...@xtra.co.nz] wrote:
> Hello misc@,
>
> Earlier today an AMD host I have froze again. I ssh'd into the host
> and retrieved the output from dmesg, /var/log/messages, and
> /var/run/dmesg.boot.
>
> I found nothing of note in $HOME/.local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log.
>
> At the time
On 2021-10-15, soko.tica wrote:
> Please don't add my e-mail address in replying, I am subscribed to @misc
> (for more than a decade).
If it annoys you that much, it is probably worth including a note
in your signature or setting Mail-Followup-To, as you probably noticed
in that time group-reply
On 2021-10-15, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> Bingo. I was even told about it in the email I ignored (there's
> nothing wrong with *69):
:) Been there done that. (If I am anywhere near tight on space in /usr
I usually try to upgrade with the "untar on running system" method with a
root shell open so I
On 2021-10-15, Rubén Llorente wrote:
> Marc Espie wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:25:17AM -, Rubén Llorente wrote:
>>> Hi there!
>>>
>>> I am wondering how does people around here keep local branches of the ports
>>> tree for personal use.
>>>
>>
>> Put your own ports into mystuff...
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 08:05:08PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
[ some cut ]
> > Anything else I can collect.
>
> You might want to compile and install nsd wit debug symbols info:
>
> cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd
> make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj
> make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper cle
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:47:22PM +0200, Mischa wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-10-15 19:42, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:16:55PM +0200, Mischa wrote:
> >
> > > On 2021-10-15 18:27, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The actual problem (SIGSEGV) happens in the child processes: kt
On 2021-10-15 19:42, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:16:55PM +0200, Mischa wrote:
On 2021-10-15 18:27, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> The actual problem (SIGSEGV) happens in the child processes: ktrace the
> children as well: ktrace -di ...
>
>-Otto
Thanx Otto.
Below is the th
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:16:55PM +0200, Mischa wrote:
> On 2021-10-15 18:27, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > The actual problem (SIGSEGV) happens in the child processes: ktrace the
> > children as well: ktrace -di ...
> >
> > -Otto
>
> Thanx Otto.
> Below is the the kdump with ktrace -di
> I
On 10/15/21 8:05 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> Does any of the OpenSBD-supported platforms boot off nvme storage?
> So far, I have been able to use nvme storage as a disk,
> but not boot from it; but my HW is far from recent.
>
> Jan
>
Hi Jan,
NVME boot will require that your motherboard / bios
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 06:18:12PM +0200, Mischa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thank you all very much for OpenBSD 7.0!
> All upgrades went as smooth as always.
>
> However when I upgraded my DNS VMs, NSD keeps exiting with status 11.
> Unfortunately even in debug mode with -V4-9 it only gives me the bel
Hi All,
Thank you all very much for OpenBSD 7.0!
All upgrades went as smooth as always.
However when I upgraded my DNS VMs, NSD keeps exiting with status 11.
Unfortunately even in debug mode with -V4-9 it only gives me the below
output.
[2021-10-15 18:05:10.995] nsd[32203]: warning: server 70
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:05:01PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> Does any of the OpenSBD-supported platforms boot off nvme storage?
> So far, I have been able to use nvme storage as a disk,
> but not boot from it; but my HW is far from recent.
The Framework laptop (https://frame.work) boots fine off a
Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:25:17AM -, Rubén Llorente wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> I am wondering how does people around here keep local branches of the ports
>> tree for personal use.
>>
>
> Put your own ports into mystuff...
>
> if you think they might interest other peop
amd64 boots from nvme (i.e. recent Thinkpads)
Jan
On October 15, 2021 5:05:01 PM GMT+02:00, Jan Stary wrote:
>Does any of the OpenSBD-supported platforms boot off nvme storage?
>So far, I have been able to use nvme storage as a disk,
>but not boot from it; but my HW is far from recent.
>
>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:05:01PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> Does any of the OpenSBD-supported platforms boot off nvme storage?
> So far, I have been able to use nvme storage as a disk,
> but not boot from it; but my HW is far from recent.
>
> Jan
Sure, my amd64 laptop boots fine from its n
Hi Jan,
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:05:01PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
| Does any of the OpenSBD-supported platforms boot off nvme storage?
| So far, I have been able to use nvme storage as a disk,
| but not boot from it; but my HW is far from recent.
Sure, I boot from nvme (actually, softraid crypto
Does any of the OpenSBD-supported platforms boot off nvme storage?
So far, I have been able to use nvme storage as a disk,
but not boot from it; but my HW is far from recent.
Jan
Hi there!
I am wondering how does people around here keep local branches of the ports
tree for personal use.
The reason I am asking is because I keep some patched ports which are suited
to solve my problems, but not suited (or useful) for submission to the
official ports tree. Ideally I would upg
> > > 3) Providers of public digital signatures offer software (a
> > > one-size-fits-all Java “blob”) that should add cryptography capabilities
> > to
> > > the operating system.
> >
> > This is important. Thank you. Let me rephrase my wild guess:
>
> 3.1) An OS (OpenBSD or other) may have crypto
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:25:17AM -, Rubén Llorente wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I am wondering how does people around here keep local branches of the ports
> tree for personal use.
>
> The reason I am asking is because I keep some patched ports which are suited
> to solve my problems, but not sui
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:25:17AM -, Rubén Llorente wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I am wondering how does people around here keep local branches of the ports
> tree for personal use.
>
> The reason I am asking is because I keep some patched ports which are suited
> to solve my problems, but not sui
Please don't add my e-mail address in replying, I am subscribed to @misc
(for more than a decade).
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:14 AM Janne Johansson
wrote:
> Den fre 15 okt. 2021 kl 11:01 skrev soko.tica :
> > Hello list,
> > I have a question about cryptography software compatibility on OpenBSD.
Thanks infoomatic,
I am not trying to certify a specific platform for the use for digital
signatures in Serbia.
I am trying to legally challenge the restrictions existing and occurring in
Serbia, effectively directly imposing the use of Adobe Software (which I
cannot use on OpenBSD) and indirectl
I agree with Janne. Almost always it is more of a compliance topic than
a technical topic.
I did work for where we provided crypto/digital signature
stuff to government and institutions I won't name, and e.g. the
constraint for choosing an operating system for a platform was almost
always certif
Den fre 15 okt. 2021 kl 11:01 skrev soko.tica :
> Hello list,
> I have a question about cryptography software compatibility on OpenBSD.
> I have a wild guess about the answer, but I need it to be more reliable.
> The target audience are lawyers, since I want to launch a legal battle in
Then you ne
Hello list,
I have a question about cryptography software compatibility on OpenBSD.
I have a wild guess about the answer, but I need it to be more reliable.
The target audience are lawyers, since I want to launch a legal battle in
Serbia for equal opportunities for using open source software, s
Oh and it's also worth noting that despite that massive cock-up,
the box is still (now) running just fine on this frankenhybrid and
serving its git repositories and running its crons, all entirely
hands-off and automated:
# uname -a && uptime
OpenBSD smoke.datum 7.0 GENERIC#224 amd64
4:29AM up 1
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2021-10-14, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> > Turns out, one of my less important boxes was still on 6.8. Whoops.
> >
> > After two sysupgrades, this is the result of pkg_add -u:
> >
> > quirks-4.53 signed on 2021-10-12T20:12:39Z
> > Can't install cairo-1.16.0 because of lib
37 matches
Mail list logo
